Databases · head to head
DynamoDB vs Solace PubSub+

DynamoDB
Databases
AWS-only managed key-value and document database with fixed per-partition throughput limits and no ad hoc queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Solace PubSub+
Databases
Multi-protocol event broker sold as software, cloud service or a hardware appliance
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DynamoDB access patterns must be designed into the key schema before launch; a query nobody anticipated needs a new global secondary index, which is a full extra copy of the projected attributes billed as storage and as writes, or an offline migration.; Solace PubSub+ no pricing is published at any tier, so evaluation requires a sales engagement before you can even judge whether it is in budget, and broker tier sizing determines cost in ways buyers frequently get wrong.
- They diverge on capability: DynamoDB covers Managed and serverless, Solace PubSub+ covers Multi-protocol broker.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DynamoDB and Solace PubSub+ actually diverge.
| Attribute | DynamoDB | Solace PubSub+ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Platforms | AWS | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, Hardware appliance |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DynamoDB
- Managed and serverless
- Predictable latency
- On-demand or provisioned capacity
- Global secondary indexes
- Transactions
- DynamoDB Streams
- Global tables
- Point-in-time recovery
Only in Solace PubSub+
- Multi-protocol broker
- Dynamic message routing
- Hardware appliance
- Event Portal
- Guaranteed delivery
- Mission Control
- Topic hierarchies and wildcards
- Kafka and MQ bridging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DynamoDB
- High-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and knownnot Solace PubSub+
- Traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercisenot Solace PubSub+
- Serverless applications on Lambda, where an HTTP-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases havenot Solace PubSub+
- Event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifiernot Solace PubSub+
Solace PubSub+
- A bank building an event mesh across regions where a Java JMS application and an MQTT mobile client must share the same topic spacenot DynamoDB
- An exchange or trading platform with a latency budget that needs the hardware appliance rather than a software brokernot DynamoDB
- An airline distributing operational events to ground systems, aircraft and partner APIs over different protocolsnot DynamoDB
- A manufacturer bridging factory MQTT telemetry into an enterprise Kafka estate without writing translation servicesnot DynamoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DynamoDB
- Access patterns must be designed into the key schema before launch; a query nobody anticipated needs a new global secondary index, which is a full extra copy of the projected attributes billed as storage and as writes, or an offline migration.
- Global secondary indexes are eventually consistent and cannot be read strongly, so a read-after-write against an index can legitimately miss the item that was just written, and application code must be written to tolerate that.
- Per-partition throughput is capped at roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units, so a hot key throttles even when the table has spare capacity overall, and the only real fix is changing the key design to spread the load.
- Items are limited to 400 KB and query results paginate at 1 MB, so large or list-shaped data has to be split, offloaded to S3 with a pointer, or read through pagination loops that complicate every consumer.
- It runs only on AWS and the API is proprietary rather than a standard, so moving the data layer means rewriting it; ScyllaDB's Alternator is the only meaningfully compatible target and it brings a much smaller ecosystem.
Solace PubSub+
- No pricing is published at any tier, so evaluation requires a sales engagement before you can even judge whether it is in budget, and broker tier sizing determines cost in ways buyers frequently get wrong.
- The free Standard edition has hard capacity and support limits, which makes it useful for development but means any real deployment triggers a commercial negotiation.
- The proprietary SMF protocol gives the best performance and feature coverage, so teams that lean on it acquire real switching costs even though open protocols are supported.
- Operating a self-managed high availability broker pair with disaster recovery is a specialist task, and Solace expertise is scarce in the hiring market compared with Kafka skills.
- Event Portal and Mission Control are licensed as part of platform packages, so the governance tooling that makes an event mesh manageable is not simply included with the broker.
Pricing, plan by plan
DynamoDB
Free- On-Demand Capacity$null/usage-based
- Pay-per-request pricing with automatic scaling
- Read: 0.5 RRU per 4 KB (eventually consistent), 1 RRU per 4 KB (strongly consistent), 2 RRU per 4 KB (transactional)
- Write: 1 WRU per 1 KB
- Provisioned Capacity$null/hourly
- Fixed hourly charges based on reserved capacity
- RCU rate: $0.00013 per hour (Standard)
- WCU rate: $0.00065 per hour (Standard)
- Standard Table Class Storage$0.25/per GB/month
- $0.25 per GB/month after free tier
- First 25 GB free per month (free tier)
- Standard-Infrequent Access Table Class$0.1/per GB/month
- $0.10 per GB/month
Solace PubSub+
Free- Software Event Broker StandardFree
- Free for production within capacity limits
- Single node, capped connections and queues
- No vendor support
- Solace Cloud$undefined/year
- Managed brokers in tiers from ENT-250 to ENT-100K
- Foundation, Accelerate and Scale platform packages
- Fixed subscription or annual consumption drawdown
- Software Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy in your own Kubernetes, VMs or data centre
- High availability and disaster recovery
- Support with SLA
- Hardware appliance$undefined/year
- Purpose-built appliance with FPGA message offload
- Deterministic low latency
- Sold with support contract
Which should you pick?
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need managed and serverless.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want predictable latency.
Choose Solace PubSub+ if
- You need multi-protocol broker.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, Hardware appliance.
- You also want dynamic message routing.
Questions people ask
- Is DynamoDB or Solace PubSub+ better?
- Neither clearly leads. DynamoDB starts at Free and Solace PubSub+ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DynamoDB or Solace PubSub+?
- DynamoDB starts at Free and Solace PubSub+ at Free.
- Does DynamoDB or Solace PubSub+ run on more platforms?
- DynamoDB runs on AWS. Solace PubSub+ runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, Hardware appliance.
- Can I use DynamoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DynamoDB best used for?
- DynamoDB is most often used for high-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and known, traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercise, serverless applications on lambda, where an http-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases have, event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifier. Of those, high-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and known and traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercise are not what Solace PubSub+ is typically brought in for.
- What can DynamoDB do that Solace PubSub+ cannot?
- DynamoDB covers Managed and serverless, Predictable latency, On-demand or provisioned capacity, Global secondary indexes. Solace PubSub+ covers Multi-protocol broker, Dynamic message routing, Hardware appliance, Event Portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DynamoDB: On-demand or provisioned capacity?
On-demand suits unpredictable or spiky traffic and removes capacity planning. Provisioned with autoscaling is considerably cheaper for steady high-volume workloads. Tables can be switched between them, though not arbitrarily often.
Solace PubSub+: Is there a free version of Solace?
Yes, the Standard edition of the software event broker is free for production within capacity limits, with no vendor support.
DynamoDB: Can I run DynamoDB outside AWS?
No. DynamoDB Local exists for development and testing only. For a production-compatible alternative elsewhere, ScyllaDB's Alternator implements the DynamoDB API, but it is a different system with a different ecosystem.
Solace PubSub+: Does Solace publish prices?
No. Cloud, software and appliance are all quoted, based on broker tier from ENT-250 to ENT-100K and licensing model.
DynamoDB: Can I run ad hoc queries or analytics?
Not on the table itself. Scans are slow and expensive at scale. The usual pattern is to export to S3 or stream changes out and query them in Athena, Redshift or another analytical engine.
Solace PubSub+: Why buy an appliance in 2026?
Deterministic low latency with message processing offloaded to hardware, which matters in capital markets and little elsewhere.
DynamoDB: Is single-table design necessary?
It is the pattern that gets the most from DynamoDB when access patterns are well known, because it lets related items be retrieved in one query. It also makes the model harder to evolve, so many teams reasonably choose multiple simpler tables and accept extra requests.
Solace PubSub+: Can it replace Kafka?
Not for log retention and stream reprocessing. It is stronger at multi-protocol routing and guaranteed delivery, and the two are often bridged.
DynamoDB: What are the real limits I should design around?
400 KB per item, 1 MB per query or scan page, 100 items per transaction, roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units per partition, and eventual consistency on global secondary indexes.
Related pages
More on Solace PubSub+
Other head to heads
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DynamoDB vs Airtable
- DynamoDB vs PostgreSQL
- DynamoDB vs BigQuery
- DynamoDB vs FaunaDB
- DynamoDB vs Memcached
- DynamoDB vs ScyllaDB
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs CosmosDB
- DynamoDB vs DataStax
- DynamoDB vs dbt
- DynamoDB vs EMQX
- DynamoDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs RabbitMQ
- DynamoDB vs Apache Pulsar
- DynamoDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- DynamoDB vs NATS
- DynamoDB vs VerneMQ
- DynamoDB vs Oracle Database
- DynamoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DynamoDB vs IBM Db2
- DynamoDB vs DuckDB
- DynamoDB vs Apache Kafka
- DynamoDB vs Azure SQL
- DynamoDB vs Apache Solr
- DynamoDB vs Apache Flink
- Solace PubSub+ vs Elasticsearch
- Solace PubSub+ vs Cassandra
- Solace PubSub+ vs Cockroach Labs
- Solace PubSub+ vs Airtable
- Solace PubSub+ vs PostgreSQL
- Solace PubSub+ vs BigQuery
- Solace PubSub+ vs FaunaDB
- Solace PubSub+ vs Memcached
- Solace PubSub+ vs ScyllaDB
- Solace PubSub+ vs PlanetScale
- Solace PubSub+ vs Couchbase
- Solace PubSub+ vs CosmosDB
- Solace PubSub+ vs DataStax
- Solace PubSub+ vs dbt
- Solace PubSub+ vs EMQX
- Solace PubSub+ vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Solace PubSub+ vs CouchDB
- Solace PubSub+ vs RabbitMQ
- Solace PubSub+ vs Apache Pulsar
- Solace PubSub+ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Solace PubSub+ vs NATS
- Solace PubSub+ vs VerneMQ
- Solace PubSub+ vs Oracle Database
- Solace PubSub+ vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Solace PubSub+ vs IBM Db2
- Solace PubSub+ vs DuckDB
- Solace PubSub+ vs Apache Kafka
- Solace PubSub+ vs Azure SQL
- Solace PubSub+ vs Apache Solr
- Solace PubSub+ vs Apache Flink
