Databases · head to head
DynamoDB vs PartyKit

DynamoDB
Databases
AWS-only managed key-value and document database with fixed per-partition throughput limits and no ad hoc queries.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
PartyKit
Developer Tools
Platform for building and deploying realtime multiplayer servers on the edge
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- PartyKit is free; DynamoDB starts at $0.625/mo.
- Only DynamoDB lists managed and serverless; only PartyKit lists stateful edge servers.
- Where PartyKit falls short: documentation and FAQ material on the marketing site is sparse compared to larger realtime platforms.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DynamoDB and PartyKit actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for PartyKit.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DynamoDB
- Managed and serverless
- Predictable latency
- On-demand or provisioned capacity
- Global secondary indexes
- Transactions
- DynamoDB Streams
- Global tables
- Point-in-time recovery
Only in PartyKit
- Stateful edge servers
- WebSocket-first API
- CRDT library compatibility
- Framework integrations
- Global edge deployment
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DynamoDB
- High-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and knownnot PartyKit
- Traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercisenot PartyKit
- Serverless applications on Lambda, where an HTTP-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases havenot PartyKit
- Event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifiernot PartyKit
PartyKit
- Multiplayer collaborative appsnot DynamoDB
- Realtime AI agent backendsnot DynamoDB
- Live cursors and presencenot DynamoDB
- Collaborative whiteboards and documentsnot DynamoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DynamoDB
- Access patterns must be designed into the key schema before launch; a query nobody anticipated needs a new global secondary index, which is a full extra copy of the projected attributes billed as storage and as writes, or an offline migration
- Global secondary indexes are eventually consistent and cannot be read strongly, so a read-after-write against an index can legitimately miss the item that was just written, and application code must be written to tolerate that
- Per-partition throughput is capped at roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units, so a hot key throttles even when the table has spare capacity overall, and the only real fix is changing the key design to spread the load
- Items are limited to 400 KB and query results paginate at 1 MB, so large or list-shaped data has to be split, offloaded to S3 with a pointer, or read through pagination loops that complicate every consumer
- It runs only on AWS and the API is proprietary rather than a standard, so moving the data layer means rewriting it; ScyllaDB's Alternator is the only meaningfully compatible target and it brings a much smaller ecosystem
PartyKit
- Documentation and FAQ material on the marketing site is sparse compared to larger realtime platforms
- Commercial free tier requires deploying to the user's own Cloudflare account, adding setup complexity
- Storage on the free Individual plan clears every 24 hours, limiting it to prototyping rather than persistent production data
- Smaller ecosystem and community than more established realtime infrastructure providers
Pricing, plan by plan
DynamoDB
Free- On-Demand CapacityOn request
- Pay-per-request pricing with automatic scaling
- Read: 0.5 RRU per 4 KB (eventually consistent), 1 RRU per 4 KB (strongly consistent), 2 RRU per 4 KB (transactional)
- Write: 1 WRU per 1 KB
- Provisioned CapacityOn request
- Fixed hourly charges based on reserved capacity
- RCU rate: $0.00013 per hour (Standard)
- WCU rate: $0.00065 per hour (Standard)
- Standard Table Class Storage$0.25/per gb/month
- $0.25 per GB/month after free tier
- First 25 GB free per month (free tier)
- Standard-Infrequent Access Table Class$0.1/per gb/month
- $0.10 per GB/month
PartyKit
Free- IndividualFree
- Up to 10 live projects
- Deploy to the global edge platform
- Storage clears every 24 hours
- CommercialFree
- Unlimited projects
- Custom domains
- Runs on your own Cloudflare account; pay only Cloudflare usage
Which should you pick?
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need managed and serverless.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want predictable latency.
Choose PartyKit if
- You need stateful edge servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want websocket-first api.
Questions people ask
- Is DynamoDB or PartyKit better?
- Neither clearly leads. DynamoDB starts at Free and PartyKit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DynamoDB or PartyKit?
- DynamoDB starts at Free and PartyKit at Free.
- Does DynamoDB or PartyKit run on more platforms?
- DynamoDB runs on AWS. PartyKit runs on Web, API.
- Can I use DynamoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DynamoDB best used for?
- DynamoDB is most often used for high-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and known, traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercise, serverless applications on lambda, where an http-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases have, event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifier. Of those, high-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and known and traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercise are not what PartyKit is typically brought in for.
- What can DynamoDB do that PartyKit cannot?
- DynamoDB covers Managed and serverless, Predictable latency, On-demand or provisioned capacity, Global secondary indexes. PartyKit covers Stateful edge servers, WebSocket-first API, CRDT library compatibility, Framework integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DynamoDB: On-demand or provisioned capacity?
On-demand suits unpredictable or spiky traffic and removes capacity planning. Provisioned with autoscaling is considerably cheaper for steady high-volume workloads. Tables can be switched between them, though not arbitrarily often.
PartyKit: How much does PartyKit cost?
PartyKit is completely free. Both the Individual and Commercial plans have no upfront costs.
SourceDynamoDB: Can I run DynamoDB outside AWS?
No. DynamoDB Local exists for development and testing only. For a production-compatible alternative elsewhere, ScyllaDB's Alternator implements the DynamoDB API, but it is a different system with a different ecosystem.
PartyKit: What is PartyKit's Individual plan?
The Individual plan is free and includes deployment to a global edge platform, support for up to 10 live projects, and is suitable for small projects. Storage is cleared every 24 hours.
SourceDynamoDB: Can I run ad hoc queries or analytics?
Not on the table itself. Scans are slow and expensive at scale. The usual pattern is to export to S3 or stream changes out and query them in Athena, Redshift or another analytical engine.
PartyKit: What is PartyKit's Commercial plan?
The Commercial plan is free but requires deploying to your own Cloudflare account. It includes custom domains, unlimited projects, and you pay only your Cloudflare usage costs.
SourceDynamoDB: Is single-table design necessary?
It is the pattern that gets the most from DynamoDB when access patterns are well known, because it lets related items be retrieved in one query. It also makes the model harder to evolve, so many teams reasonably choose multiple simpler tables and accept extra requests.
PartyKit: Can I upgrade from Individual to Commercial plan?
Yes, both plans are free but offer different feature sets. The Commercial plan removes project restrictions but requires managing your own Cloudflare infrastructure.
SourceDynamoDB: What are the real limits I should design around?
400 KB per item, 1 MB per query or scan page, 100 items per transaction, roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units per partition, and eventual consistency on global secondary indexes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DynamoDB vs MongoDB
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs BigQuery
- DynamoDB vs FaunaDB
- DynamoDB vs Memcached
- DynamoDB vs ScyllaDB
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs DataGrip
- DynamoDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DynamoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DynamoDB vs QuestDB
- DynamoDB vs Vitess
- DynamoDB vs Aiven
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- DynamoDB vs CosmosDB
- DynamoDB vs Soketi
- DynamoDB vs GitHub Copilot
- DynamoDB vs Pieces for Developers
- DynamoDB vs LaunchDarkly
- DynamoDB vs CodeSandbox
- DynamoDB vs Moonrepo
- DynamoDB vs Swagger UI
- DynamoDB vs Coder
- DynamoDB vs StackBlitz
- DynamoDB vs Deep Code
- DynamoDB vs Refact
- DynamoDB vs Earthly
- DynamoDB vs Namespace
- DynamoDB vs Nix
- DynamoDB vs Nixpacks
- DynamoDB vs Octopus Deploy
- DynamoDB vs Okteto
- DynamoDB vs OpsLevel
- PartyKit vs MongoDB
- PartyKit vs Elasticsearch
- PartyKit vs Cassandra
- PartyKit vs BigQuery
- PartyKit vs FaunaDB
- PartyKit vs Memcached
- PartyKit vs ScyllaDB
- PartyKit vs PlanetScale
- PartyKit vs Couchbase
- PartyKit vs DataGrip
- PartyKit vs Firebase Realtime Database
- PartyKit vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PartyKit vs QuestDB
- PartyKit vs Vitess
- PartyKit vs Aiven
- PartyKit vs CouchDB
- PartyKit vs Google Cloud SQL
- PartyKit vs CosmosDB
- PartyKit vs Soketi
- PartyKit vs GitHub Copilot
- PartyKit vs Pieces for Developers
- PartyKit vs LaunchDarkly
- PartyKit vs CodeSandbox
- PartyKit vs Moonrepo
- PartyKit vs Swagger UI
- PartyKit vs Coder
- PartyKit vs StackBlitz
- PartyKit vs Deep Code
- PartyKit vs Refact
- PartyKit vs Earthly
- PartyKit vs Namespace
- PartyKit vs Nix
- PartyKit vs Nixpacks
- PartyKit vs Octopus Deploy
- PartyKit vs Okteto
- PartyKit vs OpsLevel
