Manufacturing · head to head
Duro PLM vs OnShape

Duro PLM
Manufacturing
Hosted PLM for hardware startups, sold in fixed user bands with no published price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OnShape has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Duro PLM no pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.; OnShape the free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- They diverge on capability: Duro PLM covers Part library, OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duro PLM and OnShape actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duro PLM
- Part library
- Multi-level BOMs
- Change orders
- CAD integrations
- Supplier and cost data
- User band plans
Only in OnShape
- Cloud-native CAD
- Real-time collaboration
- Version control
- Part studios
- Assemblies
- Drawings
- FeatureScript
- Mobile access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duro PLM
- A robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturernot OnShape
- A consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the BOMnot OnShape
- A hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's BOM spreadsheet versionsnot OnShape
- A venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production buildnot OnShape
OnShape
- Cloud based parametric CAD without local workstation installsnot Duro PLM
- Collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documentsnot Duro PLM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duro PLM
- No pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.
- Plans are sold in fixed user bands rather than per seat, so hiring an eleventh engineer moves you to the next tier instead of adding one seat.
- Storage allowances are capped at 25, 50 and 100 GB, which is tight for teams keeping native CAD files rather than only neutral formats.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premises option, which rules Duro out for defence and some aerospace suppliers with data residency or ITAR handling constraints.
- Scope stops at engineering data: no requirements management, no quality module and no manufacturing process planning, so it does not replace the systems a company needs at production scale.
OnShape
- The free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- The Standard plan is $1,500 per user per year and Professional $2,500
- Simulation, rendering, CAM and advanced PDM all require the Professional plan
- SSO, analytics and advanced administration are Enterprise only with no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
Duro PLM
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Up to 10 users
- 25 GB data storage
- Part library, BOMs and change orders
- Business$undefined/year
- Up to 20 users
- 50 GB data storage
- CAD integrations
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 20 or more users
- 100 GB data storage
- Extended support
OnShape
Free- FreeFree
- Limited features
- Public documents
- Standard$1500/month
- Private documents
- Full features
- Professional$2100/month
- Advanced simulation
- Enterprise features
Which should you pick?
Choose OnShape if
- You need cloud-native cad.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is Duro PLM or OnShape better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duro PLM starts at On request and OnShape at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duro PLM or OnShape?
- OnShape has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Duro PLM and Free for OnShape.
- Does Duro PLM or OnShape run on more platforms?
- Duro PLM runs on Web. OnShape runs on Web, IOS, Android.
- Can I use OnShape for free?
- Yes. OnShape has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Duro PLM starts at On request.
- What is Duro PLM best used for?
- Duro PLM is most often used for a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer, a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom, a hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's bom spreadsheet versions, a venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production build. Of those, a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer and a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom are not what OnShape is typically brought in for.
- What can Duro PLM do that OnShape cannot?
- Duro PLM covers Part library, Multi-level BOMs, Change orders, CAD integrations. OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, Real-time collaboration, Version control, Part studios.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duro PLM: How much does Duro cost?
Duro does not publish prices. Plans are fixed annual subscriptions quoted by sales against a user band, billed Net 30.
OnShape: How much does Onshape cost?
Onshape Standard is $1,500 per user per year and Professional is $2,500 per user per year, both billed annually. Enterprise is quoted by sales. A free plan exists for non-commercial use.
SourceDuro PLM: Can I run Duro on my own servers?
No. It is cloud only, which is a hard blocker for organisations with data residency or export control requirements.
OnShape: Is the free version of Onshape usable for commercial work?
No. Onshape states the free plan is for non-commercial use only, and every document created on it is publicly accessible. Private storage requires the Standard plan at $1,500 per user per year.
SourceDuro PLM: What happens when we exceed our user band?
You move to the next tier rather than adding individual seats, so growth arrives as a step change in cost.
OnShape: What does Onshape Professional add over Standard?
Professional adds company managed data, release management, advanced PDM, simulation, rendering, ECAD to MCAD exchange and CAM, for $2,500 per user per year against $1,500 for Standard.
SourceDuro PLM: Is Duro suitable for medical device work?
Its change control is real but the workflow configuration and audit depth are lighter than dedicated regulated-industry PLM, so most ISO 13485 programmes need more.
OnShape: Can I try Onshape Professional for free?
Onshape states that qualified professionals can try Onshape Professional free for up to 6 months through its Discovery Program, with no credit card required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Duro PLM vs Fusion 360
- Duro PLM vs PTC Windchill
- Duro PLM vs Aras Innovator
- Duro PLM vs OpenBOM
- Duro PLM vs Propel
- Duro PLM vs Augury
- Duro PLM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Duro PLM vs KCF Technologies
- Duro PLM vs MOVUS
- Duro PLM vs Sight Machine
- Duro PLM vs TrakSYS
- Duro PLM vs AMFG
- Duro PLM vs Authentise
- Duro PLM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Duro PLM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Duro PLM vs Arena PLM
- Duro PLM vs Altium 365
- Duro PLM vs Enscape
- Duro PLM vs KeyShot
- Duro PLM vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Duro PLM vs FreeCAD
- Duro PLM vs Zoo
- Duro PLM vs V-Ray
- Duro PLM vs SolveSpace
- Duro PLM vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Duro PLM vs Lumion
- Duro PLM vs Twinmotion
- Duro PLM vs ANSYS Fluent
- Duro PLM vs Substance 3D Designer
- Duro PLM vs Tinkercad
- Duro PLM vs Vectorworks
- Duro PLM vs Houdini
- Duro PLM vs ZBrush
- OnShape vs Fusion 360
- OnShape vs PTC Windchill
- OnShape vs Aras Innovator
- OnShape vs OpenBOM
- OnShape vs Propel
- OnShape vs Augury
- OnShape vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- OnShape vs KCF Technologies
- OnShape vs MOVUS
- OnShape vs Sight Machine
- OnShape vs TrakSYS
- OnShape vs AMFG
- OnShape vs Authentise
- OnShape vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OnShape vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OnShape vs Arena PLM
- OnShape vs Altium 365
- OnShape vs Enscape
- OnShape vs KeyShot
- OnShape vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- OnShape vs FreeCAD
- OnShape vs Zoo
- OnShape vs V-Ray
- OnShape vs SolveSpace
- OnShape vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- OnShape vs Lumion
- OnShape vs Twinmotion
- OnShape vs ANSYS Fluent
- OnShape vs Substance 3D Designer
- OnShape vs Tinkercad
- OnShape vs Vectorworks
- OnShape vs Houdini
- OnShape vs ZBrush

