File Storage · head to head
Duplicati vs Jenkins

Jenkins
Technology
A self-hosted automation server that can build almost anything, through a plugin ecosystem that is also its main liability.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Duplicati no managed service or commercial support; Jenkins the controller is stateful and, in the open source distribution, has no high availability: build history, configuration and plugin state live on one filesystem, so every plugin upgrade and core update is downtime for every team using it, and a controller disk failure is a restore-from-backup event.
- They diverge on capability: Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, Jenkins covers Plugin ecosystem.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duplicati and Jenkins actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duplicati
- AES-256 encryption
- Incremental backup
- Deduplication
- Multiple cloud backends
- Compression
- Web interface
- AWS S3
- Azure
Only in Jenkins
- Plugin ecosystem
- Distributed agents
- Declarative and scripted pipelines
- Shared libraries
- Configuration as Code
- Credentials management
- Self-hosted anywhere
- Multibranch and organisation folders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duplicati
- Data protectionnot Jenkins
- Disaster recoverynot Jenkins
- Business continuitynot Jenkins
- Ransomware protectionnot Jenkins
- Compliancenot Jenkins
Jenkins
- Builds that must touch physical hardware, such as embedded devices, test rigs or signing modules attached to a specific machinenot Duplicati
- Air-gapped or heavily regulated environments where a hosted CI runner cannot be used at allnot Duplicati
- Toolchains that hosted CI does not support, including node-locked commercial licences for EDA, CAD or simulation softwarenot Duplicati
- Organisations with years of existing Jenkins pipelines where the migration cost currently outweighs the operational cost of stayingnot Duplicati
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duplicati
- No managed service or commercial support
- Relies on community support
- No enterprise features
Jenkins
- The controller is stateful and, in the open source distribution, has no high availability: build history, configuration and plugin state live on one filesystem, so every plugin upgrade and core update is downtime for every team using it, and a controller disk failure is a restore-from-backup event.
- Capability comes from around 1,900 community plugins of very uneven maintenance, and the Jenkins security team regularly publishes advisories for plugins whose maintainer has gone; in some cases the advisory itself states that no fix is available and the only remedy is to stop using it.
- Plugin upgrades are coupled: one plugin can require a newer core or a newer version of another plugin, so applying a single security fix cascades into a coordinated upgrade of a dozen components on a timetable you did not choose.
- Pipelines are Groovy running under a sandbox and a continuation-passing-style transformation, so ordinary Groovy constructs sometimes fail in non-obvious ways, and the debugging skill you build transfers to no other CI system.
- It is free to licence and expensive to run: somebody must own the controller, the agents, the Java version, the credentials store and the plugin upgrade cycle, and that recurring staff cost is the usual reason organisations move to hosted CI even when Jenkins works.
- Leaving is costly by construction, because shared libraries, plugin-specific pipeline steps and accumulated freestyle jobs have no mechanical translation into GitHub Actions or GitLab CI, so the migration is a rewrite whose price grows every year you defer it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duplicati
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Duplicati review.
Jenkins
Free- Open SourceFree
- Unlimited builds
- 1000+ plugins
- Self-hosted
- CloudBees CI$undefined/month
- Enterprise features
- High availability
- Role-based access
Which should you pick?
Choose Duplicati if
- You need aes-256 encryption.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want incremental backup.
Choose Jenkins if
- You need plugin ecosystem.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- You also want distributed agents.
Questions people ask
- Is Duplicati or Jenkins better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duplicati starts at Free and Jenkins at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duplicati or Jenkins?
- Duplicati starts at Free and Jenkins at Free.
- Does Duplicati or Jenkins run on more platforms?
- Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Jenkins runs on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- Can I use Duplicati for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Duplicati best used for?
- Duplicati is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Jenkins is typically brought in for.
- What can Duplicati do that Jenkins cannot?
- Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, Incremental backup, Deduplication, Multiple cloud backends. Jenkins covers Plugin ecosystem, Distributed agents, Declarative and scripted pipelines, Shared libraries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duplicati: Is Duplicati free?
Yes. Duplicati is completely free and open-source under the LGPL license. There are no premium tiers, trials, or limitations.
SourceJenkins: Why choose Jenkins over GitHub Actions or GitLab CI?
When the build needs something hosted runners cannot give you: physical hardware, an air-gapped network, a node-locked commercial tool licence, or an unusual platform. If none of those apply, hosted CI is usually less work to own.
Duplicati: What does Duplicati support?
Duplicati supports zero-trust, fully encrypted backups to local storage, network drives, and cloud services. It includes deduplication and incremental backups.
SourceJenkins: Can Jenkins run in high availability?
Not in the open source distribution, which runs a single active controller. High availability and active-active controllers are features of CloudBees' commercial products. Open source deployments mitigate it with fast restores and, sometimes, multiple independent controllers.
Duplicati: What are the platforms?
Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can back up data to local storage, network drives, or cloud providers.
SourceJenkins: How risky are the plugins?
This is the main operational risk. Many plugins have a single volunteer maintainer, and Jenkins publishes security advisories for unmaintained plugins where no fix exists. Auditing which plugins you depend on and who maintains them should be a periodic task, not a one-off.
Jenkins: Do I need to know Groovy?
For declarative pipelines you can go a long way without it. Anything involving shared libraries, conditional logic or custom steps is Groovy, and it runs in a sandboxed, transformed environment where standard Groovy idioms sometimes behave unexpectedly.
Jenkins: What does it cost?
The software is free under the MIT licence. The cost is infrastructure and staff time to run controllers, agents and upgrades, plus a CloudBees subscription if you want high availability, support or centralised management of many controllers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duplicati vs Arq Backup
- Duplicati vs Carbonite
- Duplicati vs Ceph
- Duplicati vs TrueNAS
- Duplicati vs Nextcloud
- Duplicati vs pCloud
- Duplicati vs Sync.com
- Duplicati vs Tresorit
- Duplicati vs Backblaze
- Duplicati vs Cloudian
- Duplicati vs LucidLink
- Duplicati vs Storj
- Duplicati vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Duplicati vs Zerto
- Duplicati vs IDrive e2
- Duplicati vs Panzura
- Duplicati vs Linear
- Duplicati vs Asana
- Duplicati vs ClickUp
- Duplicati vs Figma
- Duplicati vs Kubernetes
- Duplicati vs Terraform
- Duplicati vs GitLab
- Duplicati vs GitHub
- Duplicati vs Mozilla Firefox
- Duplicati vs Sentry
- Duplicati vs Height
- Duplicati vs Attio
- Duplicati vs CloudAMQP
- Duplicati vs Dropbox
- Duplicati vs Eclipse
- Duplicati vs Miro
- Duplicati vs Personetics
- Duplicati vs Plane
- Jenkins vs Arq Backup
- Jenkins vs Carbonite
- Jenkins vs Ceph
- Jenkins vs TrueNAS
- Jenkins vs Nextcloud
- Jenkins vs pCloud
- Jenkins vs Sync.com
- Jenkins vs Tresorit
- Jenkins vs Backblaze
- Jenkins vs Cloudian
- Jenkins vs LucidLink
- Jenkins vs Storj
- Jenkins vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Jenkins vs Zerto
- Jenkins vs IDrive e2
- Jenkins vs Panzura
- Jenkins vs Linear
- Jenkins vs Asana
- Jenkins vs ClickUp
- Jenkins vs Figma
- Jenkins vs Kubernetes
- Jenkins vs Terraform
- Jenkins vs GitLab
- Jenkins vs GitHub
- Jenkins vs Mozilla Firefox
- Jenkins vs Sentry
- Jenkins vs Height
- Jenkins vs Attio
- Jenkins vs CloudAMQP
- Jenkins vs Dropbox
- Jenkins vs Eclipse
- Jenkins vs Miro
- Jenkins vs Personetics
- Jenkins vs Plane

