Cybersecurity · head to head
DTiQ vs Saviynt

DTiQ
Cybersecurity
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Saviynt
Cybersecurity
Cloud identity governance with privileged access in the same platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DTiQ you are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.; Saviynt implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- They diverge on capability: DTiQ covers SmartAudit, Saviynt covers Identity governance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DTiQ and Saviynt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DTiQ
- SmartAudit
- POS transaction linking
- 360iQ platform
- Exception alerting
- Drive-through timing
- Food safety and compliance checks
- Managed installation
Only in Saviynt
- Identity governance
- Access certification
- Segregation of duties
- Privileged access
- Cloud entitlements
- Third party access
- Access request
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DTiQ
- A multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen storesnot Saviynt
- A convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counternot Saviynt
- An operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdotenot Saviynt
- A brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field managernot Saviynt
Saviynt
- An enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviewsnot DTiQ
- A healthcare system governing clinician access to Epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaignnot DTiQ
- A company that has to prove segregation of duties in SAP to an external auditor every yearnot DTiQ
- A federal contractor needing an identity governance service with FedRAMP authorisationnot DTiQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DTiQ
- You are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- Audits are sampled, not continuous, so a problem outside the reviewed window is invisible and the score is a statistical impression rather than a complete record.
- Nothing is published on price and the commercial shape is a multi-year managed service agreement, which is harder to exit than a software subscription and typically involves bundled hardware you do not own.
- Ownership changed in a $200 million Digital Alpha led investment tied to a Cisco Meraki partnership, so the hardware and network roadmap may shift under an existing estate.
- It is built around restaurant, convenience and retail operating models, so an organisation outside those verticals gets a generic video product and pays for an audit methodology that does not fit its work.
Saviynt
- Implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Governance quality is limited by HR and application data quality, so organisations with inconsistent joiner records spend the early phases correcting source data rather than certifying access.
- Pricing is per governed identity, so counting contractors, service accounts and non-employee identities materially changes the bill and the definition is worth negotiating explicitly.
- The privileged access module is younger than the governance core and is not a full substitute for a dedicated PAM product in estates with heavy session recording or credential rotation requirements.
- Connectors to less common applications require custom development, and each one adds a maintenance burden that reappears every time the target application changes its API.
Pricing, plan by plan
DTiQ
On request- DTiQ managed service$undefined/month
- Priced per location as a managed service, not per camera
- Audit frequency and scope determine the rate
- Hardware and installation bundled into the service agreement
Saviynt
On request- Saviynt Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per governed identity per year
- Modules for governance, privileged access and cloud entitlements
- SaaS delivery with FedRAMP authorised offering available
Which should you pick?
Choose DTiQ if
- You need smartaudit.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pos transaction linking.
Questions people ask
- Is DTiQ or Saviynt better?
- Neither clearly leads. DTiQ starts at On request and Saviynt at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DTiQ or Saviynt?
- DTiQ starts at On request and Saviynt at On request.
- Does DTiQ or Saviynt run on more platforms?
- DTiQ runs on Web, iOS, Android. Saviynt runs on Web.
- What is DTiQ best used for?
- DTiQ is most often used for a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores, a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter, an operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdote, a brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field manager. Of those, a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores and a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter are not what Saviynt is typically brought in for.
- What can DTiQ do that Saviynt cannot?
- DTiQ covers SmartAudit, POS transaction linking, 360iQ platform, Exception alerting. Saviynt covers Identity governance, Access certification, Segregation of duties, Privileged access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DTiQ: Is DTiQ a video management system?
Not primarily. It is a managed service where human auditors review your footage and deliver scored reports. The platform exists to support that service.
Saviynt: Does Saviynt replace a PAM vendor?
It can for time-bound privileged access, but organisations with heavy session recording, credential rotation or legacy server access requirements often keep a dedicated PAM product alongside it.
DTiQ: How is it priced?
Per location as a managed service, based on audit scope and frequency, with hardware and installation bundled. Nothing is published.
Saviynt: Is there a FedRAMP authorised version?
Yes, Saviynt offers a FedRAMP authorised government cloud offering, which matters where that is an eligibility requirement rather than a preference.
DTiQ: Who owns DTiQ?
Digital Alpha holds a majority stake following a $200 million investment that bought out Bain Capital, BV Investment Partners and others, alongside a Cisco Meraki partnership.
Saviynt: How is it priced?
Per governed identity per year, quoted. Define carefully whether service accounts and contractors count toward the identity total.
DTiQ: Does it integrate with my POS?
Yes, with major restaurant and convenience store point of sale systems, which is what allows transaction exceptions to be replayed on video.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DTiQ vs Rhombus Systems
- DTiQ vs Salient CompleteView
- DTiQ vs Spot AI
- DTiQ vs Envysion
- DTiQ vs March Networks
- DTiQ vs Eagle Eye Networks
- DTiQ vs Camio
- DTiQ vs BigID
- DTiQ vs NICE Actimize
- DTiQ vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- DTiQ vs Proofpoint
- DTiQ vs Genetec Security Center
- DTiQ vs Endor Labs
- DTiQ vs Enpass
- DTiQ vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- DTiQ vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DTiQ vs Fortinet FortiGate
- DTiQ vs HID Global
- DTiQ vs One Identity
- DTiQ vs Delinea
- DTiQ vs Omada Identity
- DTiQ vs Infisical
- DTiQ vs Netwrix
- DTiQ vs BeyondTrust
- DTiQ vs Doppler
- DTiQ vs HashiCorp Boundary
- DTiQ vs Speakeasy
- DTiQ vs Chainguard
- DTiQ vs Fenergo
- DTiQ vs Tenable
- DTiQ vs Hanwha Vision
- DTiQ vs Idira
- DTiQ vs IVPN
- DTiQ vs Logto
- DTiQ vs Malwarebytes
- DTiQ vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Saviynt vs Rhombus Systems
- Saviynt vs Salient CompleteView
- Saviynt vs Spot AI
- Saviynt vs Envysion
- Saviynt vs March Networks
- Saviynt vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Saviynt vs Camio
- Saviynt vs BigID
- Saviynt vs NICE Actimize
- Saviynt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Saviynt vs Proofpoint
- Saviynt vs Genetec Security Center
- Saviynt vs Endor Labs
- Saviynt vs Enpass
- Saviynt vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Saviynt vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Saviynt vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Saviynt vs HID Global
- Saviynt vs One Identity
- Saviynt vs Delinea
- Saviynt vs Omada Identity
- Saviynt vs Infisical
- Saviynt vs Netwrix
- Saviynt vs BeyondTrust
- Saviynt vs Doppler
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Saviynt vs Speakeasy
- Saviynt vs Chainguard
- Saviynt vs Fenergo
- Saviynt vs Tenable
- Saviynt vs Hanwha Vision
- Saviynt vs Idira
- Saviynt vs IVPN
- Saviynt vs Logto
- Saviynt vs Malwarebytes
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
