Databases · head to head
Dragonfly vs Okta

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dragonfly flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dragonfly and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
- Cloud deployment
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot Okta
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot Okta
- Message queue and event processingnot Okta
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot Okta
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Dragonfly
- Customer identitynot Dragonfly
- B2B integrationnot Dragonfly
- Zero Trust securitynot Dragonfly
- Compliancenot Dragonfly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2000/month
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Dragonfly or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dragonfly starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dragonfly or Okta?
- Dragonfly starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Dragonfly or Okta run on more platforms?
- Dragonfly runs on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Dragonfly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dragonfly best used for?
- Dragonfly is most often used for high-throughput caching for web applications, real-time leaderboards and rankings, message queue and event processing, ml model feature serving at millisecond latencies. Of those, high-throughput caching for web applications and real-time leaderboards and rankings are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Dragonfly do that Okta cannot?
- Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceOkta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceDragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Dragonfly vs Cockroach Labs
- Dragonfly vs PostgreSQL
- Dragonfly vs Airtable
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs Elasticsearch
- Dragonfly vs Apache Kafka
- Dragonfly vs PlanetScale
- Dragonfly vs Meilisearch
- Dragonfly vs Turso
- Dragonfly vs Azure SQL
- Dragonfly vs ClickHouse
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs DuckDB
- Dragonfly vs MariaDB
- Dragonfly vs Oracle Database
- Dragonfly vs DataGrip
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs Google Cloud SQL
- Dragonfly vs Asana
- Dragonfly vs ClickUp
- Dragonfly vs Linear
- Dragonfly vs Figma
- Dragonfly vs Kubernetes
- Dragonfly vs Notion
- Dragonfly vs Datadog
- Dragonfly vs Monday.com
- Dragonfly vs Terraform
- Dragonfly vs Docker
- Dragonfly vs Greenhouse
- Dragonfly vs Google Chrome
- Dragonfly vs Intercom
- Dragonfly vs Mozilla Firefox
- Dragonfly vs PostHog
- Dragonfly vs Redis
- Dragonfly vs Supabase
- Dragonfly vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Cockroach Labs
- Okta vs PostgreSQL
- Okta vs Airtable
- Okta vs Amazon Aurora
- Okta vs Elasticsearch
- Okta vs Apache Kafka
- Okta vs PlanetScale
- Okta vs Meilisearch
- Okta vs Turso
- Okta vs Azure SQL
- Okta vs ClickHouse
- Okta vs Couchbase
- Okta vs DuckDB
- Okta vs MariaDB
- Okta vs Oracle Database
- Okta vs DataGrip
- Okta vs Firebolt
- Okta vs Google Cloud SQL
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Kubernetes
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Terraform
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Google Chrome
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs Redis
- Okta vs Supabase
- Okta vs Amplitude

