Databases · head to head
Dragonfly vs Neon

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dragonfly flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring; Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- They diverge on capability: Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dragonfly and Neon actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot Neon
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot Neon
- Message queue and event processingnot Neon
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot Neon
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot Neon
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot Dragonfly
- Development databasesnot Dragonfly
- Preview environmentsnot Dragonfly
- Testingnot Dragonfly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
Pricing, plan by plan
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2000/month
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
Which should you pick?
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Questions people ask
- Is Dragonfly or Neon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dragonfly starts at Free and Neon at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dragonfly or Neon?
- Dragonfly starts at Free and Neon at Free.
- Does Dragonfly or Neon run on more platforms?
- Dragonfly runs on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure. Neon runs on Cloud.
- Can I use Dragonfly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dragonfly best used for?
- Dragonfly is most often used for high-throughput caching for web applications, real-time leaderboards and rankings, message queue and event processing, ml model feature serving at millisecond latencies. Of those, high-throughput caching for web applications and real-time leaderboards and rankings are not what Neon is typically brought in for.
- What can Dragonfly do that Neon cannot?
- Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency. Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceNeon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceDragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Dragonfly vs Valkey
- Dragonfly vs Memcached
- Dragonfly vs Readyset
- Dragonfly vs SingleStore
- Dragonfly vs Apache Druid
- Dragonfly vs TiDB
- Dragonfly vs ScyllaDB
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs QuestDB
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs turbopuffer
- Dragonfly vs Instaclustr
- Dragonfly vs Knack
- Dragonfly vs LanceDB
- Dragonfly vs Marqo
- Dragonfly vs Nile
- Dragonfly vs Ninox
- Dragonfly vs Upstash
- Dragonfly vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Dragonfly vs DigitalOcean
- Dragonfly vs Render
- Dragonfly vs Oracle Cloud
- Dragonfly vs Fly.io
- Dragonfly vs Railway
- Dragonfly vs Scaleway
- Dragonfly vs Proxmox VE
- Dragonfly vs Vultr
- Dragonfly vs Tencent Cloud
- Dragonfly vs Lambda
- Dragonfly vs Linode
- Dragonfly vs Longhorn
- Dragonfly vs Northflank
- Dragonfly vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Dragonfly vs minikube
- Dragonfly vs OpenTelemetry
- Neon vs Valkey
- Neon vs Memcached
- Neon vs Readyset
- Neon vs SingleStore
- Neon vs Apache Druid
- Neon vs TiDB
- Neon vs ScyllaDB
- Neon vs Firebolt
- Neon vs QuestDB
- Neon vs Amazon Aurora
- Neon vs Couchbase
- Neon vs turbopuffer
- Neon vs Instaclustr
- Neon vs Knack
- Neon vs LanceDB
- Neon vs Marqo
- Neon vs Nile
- Neon vs Ninox
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Oracle Cloud
- Neon vs Fly.io
- Neon vs Railway
- Neon vs Scaleway
- Neon vs Proxmox VE
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Tencent Cloud
- Neon vs Lambda
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Longhorn
- Neon vs Northflank
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs minikube
- Neon vs OpenTelemetry

