Databases · head to head
Dragonfly vs HAProxy

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dragonfly flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring; HAProxy configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- They diverge on capability: Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, HAProxy covers High throughput.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dragonfly and HAProxy actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
- Cloud deployment
Only in HAProxy
- High throughput
- Layer 4 and 7
- Health checking
- Rate limiting and ACLs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot HAProxy
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot HAProxy
- Message queue and event processingnot HAProxy
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot HAProxy
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot HAProxy
HAProxy
- Load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware billnot Dragonfly
- Precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rulesnot Dragonfly
- TCP load balancing for databases and non-HTTP servicesnot Dragonfly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
HAProxy
- Configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- No automatic certificate management, unlike newer servers that treat it as default behaviour
- The built-in stats page is basic, so real observability needs exporters and dashboards
- A dedicated load balancer is more machinery than small deployments need
Pricing, plan by plan
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2000/month
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
HAProxy
Free- HAProxyFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Choose HAProxy if
- You need high throughput.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want layer 4 and 7.
Questions people ask
- Is Dragonfly or HAProxy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dragonfly starts at Free and HAProxy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dragonfly or HAProxy?
- Dragonfly starts at Free and HAProxy at Free.
- Does Dragonfly or HAProxy run on more platforms?
- Dragonfly runs on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure. HAProxy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Dragonfly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dragonfly best used for?
- Dragonfly is most often used for high-throughput caching for web applications, real-time leaderboards and rankings, message queue and event processing, ml model feature serving at millisecond latencies. Of those, high-throughput caching for web applications and real-time leaderboards and rankings are not what HAProxy is typically brought in for.
- What can Dragonfly do that HAProxy cannot?
- Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency. HAProxy covers High throughput, Layer 4 and 7, Health checking, Rate limiting and ACLs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceHAProxy: Is HAProxy free?
Yes, the community version is open source. HAProxy Technologies sells HAProxy Enterprise separately.
Dragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceHAProxy: HAProxy or Nginx?
HAProxy is a specialist load balancer with deeper balancing and health-check features. Nginx also serves static content and is more approachable, which is why it is more common as a general web server.
HAProxy: Does HAProxy handle TLS certificates automatically?
No. Certificate issuance and renewal are external, unlike Caddy where it is automatic.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dragonfly vs Valkey
- Dragonfly vs Memcached
- Dragonfly vs Readyset
- Dragonfly vs SingleStore
- Dragonfly vs Apache Druid
- Dragonfly vs TiDB
- Dragonfly vs ScyllaDB
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs QuestDB
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs turbopuffer
- Dragonfly vs Instaclustr
- Dragonfly vs Knack
- Dragonfly vs LanceDB
- Dragonfly vs Marqo
- Dragonfly vs Nile
- Dragonfly vs Ninox
- Dragonfly vs Caddy
- Dragonfly vs Fastly
- Dragonfly vs Jaeger
- Dragonfly vs Vultr
- Dragonfly vs Contabo
- Dragonfly vs Koyeb
- Dragonfly vs Fireworks AI
- Dragonfly vs Go
- Dragonfly vs Proxmox VE
- Dragonfly vs VictoriaMetrics
- Dragonfly vs Northflank
- Dragonfly vs Oracle Cloud
- Dragonfly vs Orca Security
- Dragonfly vs Cilium
- Dragonfly vs Thanos
- Dragonfly vs Longhorn
- Dragonfly vs minikube
- Dragonfly vs OpenTelemetry
- HAProxy vs Valkey
- HAProxy vs Memcached
- HAProxy vs Readyset
- HAProxy vs SingleStore
- HAProxy vs Apache Druid
- HAProxy vs TiDB
- HAProxy vs ScyllaDB
- HAProxy vs Firebolt
- HAProxy vs QuestDB
- HAProxy vs Amazon Aurora
- HAProxy vs Couchbase
- HAProxy vs turbopuffer
- HAProxy vs Instaclustr
- HAProxy vs Knack
- HAProxy vs LanceDB
- HAProxy vs Marqo
- HAProxy vs Nile
- HAProxy vs Ninox
- HAProxy vs Caddy
- HAProxy vs Fastly
- HAProxy vs Jaeger
- HAProxy vs Vultr
- HAProxy vs Contabo
- HAProxy vs Koyeb
- HAProxy vs Fireworks AI
- HAProxy vs Go
- HAProxy vs Proxmox VE
- HAProxy vs VictoriaMetrics
- HAProxy vs Northflank
- HAProxy vs Oracle Cloud
- HAProxy vs Orca Security
- HAProxy vs Cilium
- HAProxy vs Thanos
- HAProxy vs Longhorn
- HAProxy vs minikube
- HAProxy vs OpenTelemetry

