Databases · head to head
Dragonfly vs Fivetran HVR

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Fivetran HVR
Databases
Log-based change data capture for database replication and synchronization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dragonfly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dragonfly flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring; Fivetran HVR pricing not published separately; part of Fivetran's usage model
- They diverge on capability: Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Fivetran HVR covers Log-based change capture.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dragonfly and Fivetran HVR actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dragonfly | Fivetran HVR |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Usage-based cloud pricing with flexible tiers | Usage-based, integrated with Fivetran billing |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure | Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
- Cloud deployment
Only in Fivetran HVR
- Log-based change capture
- Real-time replication
- Schema evolution handling
- Multi-table consistency
- Zero-impact monitoring
- Fivetran integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot Fivetran HVR
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot Fivetran HVR
- Message queue and event processingnot Fivetran HVR
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot Fivetran HVR
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot Fivetran HVR
Fivetran HVR
- Real-time database replication to data warehousesnot Dragonfly
- Maintaining operational copies for analyticsnot Dragonfly
- Disaster recovery and business continuitynot Dragonfly
- Feeding AI systems with fresh governed datanot Dragonfly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
Fivetran HVR
- Pricing not published separately; part of Fivetran's usage model
- Requires Fivetran relationship for implementation
- Limited standalone documentation and community resources
- May be overkill for simple batch replication needs
- Competitive offerings provide more transparent per-connector pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2000/month
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
Fivetran HVR
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Fivetran HVR review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Choose Fivetran HVR if
- You need log-based change capture.
- You work on Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases.
- You also want real-time replication.
Questions people ask
- Is Dragonfly or Fivetran HVR better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dragonfly starts at Free and Fivetran HVR at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dragonfly or Fivetran HVR?
- Dragonfly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dragonfly and On request for Fivetran HVR.
- Does Dragonfly or Fivetran HVR run on more platforms?
- Dragonfly runs on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure. Fivetran HVR runs on Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases.
- Can I use Dragonfly for free?
- Yes. Dragonfly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fivetran HVR starts at On request.
- What is Dragonfly best used for?
- Dragonfly is most often used for high-throughput caching for web applications, real-time leaderboards and rankings, message queue and event processing, ml model feature serving at millisecond latencies. Of those, high-throughput caching for web applications and real-time leaderboards and rankings are not what Fivetran HVR is typically brought in for.
- What can Dragonfly do that Fivetran HVR cannot?
- Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency. Fivetran HVR covers Log-based change capture, Real-time replication, Schema evolution handling, Multi-table consistency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceFivetran HVR: What databases does Fivetran HVR support?
HVR supports major databases including Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and others that emit transaction logs.
SourceDragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceFivetran HVR: Is HVR part of standard Fivetran pricing?
Yes, HVR is integrated into Fivetran's usage-based pricing model with standard per-row-synced and transformation costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Fivetran HVR
Other head to heads
- Dragonfly vs Cockroach Labs
- Dragonfly vs PostgreSQL
- Dragonfly vs Airtable
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs Elasticsearch
- Dragonfly vs Apache Kafka
- Dragonfly vs PlanetScale
- Dragonfly vs Meilisearch
- Dragonfly vs Turso
- Dragonfly vs Azure SQL
- Dragonfly vs ClickHouse
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs DuckDB
- Dragonfly vs MariaDB
- Dragonfly vs Oracle Database
- Dragonfly vs DataGrip
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs Google Cloud SQL
- Fivetran HVR vs Cockroach Labs
- Fivetran HVR vs PostgreSQL
- Fivetran HVR vs Airtable
- Fivetran HVR vs Amazon Aurora
- Fivetran HVR vs Elasticsearch
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Kafka
- Fivetran HVR vs PlanetScale
- Fivetran HVR vs Meilisearch
- Fivetran HVR vs Turso
- Fivetran HVR vs Azure SQL
- Fivetran HVR vs ClickHouse
- Fivetran HVR vs Couchbase
- Fivetran HVR vs DuckDB
- Fivetran HVR vs MariaDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Oracle Database
- Fivetran HVR vs DataGrip
- Fivetran HVR vs Firebolt
- Fivetran HVR vs Google Cloud SQL
