Databases · head to head
Apache Pinot vs Dragonfly

Apache Pinot
Databases
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service; Dragonfly flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pinot and Dragonfly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pinot | Dragonfly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Usage-based cloud pricing with flexible tiers |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot Dragonfly
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot Dragonfly
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot Dragonfly
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot Dragonfly
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot Apache Pinot
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot Apache Pinot
- Message queue and event processingnot Apache Pinot
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot Apache Pinot
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot Apache Pinot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2000/month
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pinot or Dragonfly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pinot starts at Free and Dragonfly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pinot or Dragonfly?
- Apache Pinot starts at Free and Dragonfly at Free.
- Does Apache Pinot or Dragonfly run on more platforms?
- Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Dragonfly runs on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- Can I use Apache Pinot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pinot best used for?
- Apache Pinot is most often used for sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data, user-facing dashboards inside a product, real-time metrics at high ingest rates, petabyte-scale analytics as run at linkedin and uber. Of those, sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data and user-facing dashboards inside a product are not what Dragonfly is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pinot do that Dragonfly cannot?
- Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pinot: How much does Apache Pinot cost?
Apache Pinot is free and open-source. It is provided under the Apache License, which allows free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceDragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceApache Pinot: Is Apache Pinot free for commercial use?
Yes. Apache Pinot is licensed under the Apache License, which explicitly permits commercial use at no cost.
SourceDragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceApache Pinot: Can I run Apache Pinot locally or with Docker?
Yes. Apache Pinot offers a Docker quickstart and free downloads of the latest version (1.5.1 at the time of the page). You are responsible for hosting and infrastructure.
SourceApache Pinot: Are there restrictions on how I can use Apache Pinot?
The Apache License permits unrestricted use, but requires retention of license notices and statements. No usage limits or feature restrictions are enforced.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pinot
Other head to heads
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Tinybird
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs SingleStore
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs Estuary
- Apache Pinot vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Pinot vs Materialize
- Apache Pinot vs DataGrip
- Apache Pinot vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pinot vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Pinot vs QuestDB
- Apache Pinot vs Valkey
- Apache Pinot vs Memcached
- Apache Pinot vs Readyset
- Apache Pinot vs Apache Druid
- Apache Pinot vs TiDB
- Apache Pinot vs ScyllaDB
- Apache Pinot vs Couchbase
- Apache Pinot vs turbopuffer
- Apache Pinot vs Instaclustr
- Apache Pinot vs Knack
- Apache Pinot vs LanceDB
- Apache Pinot vs Marqo
- Apache Pinot vs Nile
- Apache Pinot vs Ninox
- Dragonfly vs ClickHouse
- Dragonfly vs Tinybird
- Dragonfly vs Airtable
- Dragonfly vs Cockroach Labs
- Dragonfly vs PostgreSQL
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs SingleStore
- Dragonfly vs DuckDB
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs Estuary
- Dragonfly vs TimescaleDB
- Dragonfly vs Materialize
- Dragonfly vs DataGrip
- Dragonfly vs Google Cloud SQL
- Dragonfly vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Dragonfly vs QuestDB
- Dragonfly vs Valkey
- Dragonfly vs Memcached
- Dragonfly vs Readyset
- Dragonfly vs Apache Druid
- Dragonfly vs TiDB
- Dragonfly vs ScyllaDB
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs turbopuffer
- Dragonfly vs Instaclustr
- Dragonfly vs Knack
- Dragonfly vs LanceDB
- Dragonfly vs Marqo
- Dragonfly vs Nile
- Dragonfly vs Ninox
