Cloud · head to head
Dokku vs Wasabi

Dokku
Cloud
Single-server platform that accepts a git push and runs Heroku buildpacks on Docker
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dokku has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dokku one maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Dokku covers Git push deploy, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dokku and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dokku
- Git push deploy
- Heroku buildpacks
- Datastore plugins
- Automatic certificates
- Zero downtime deploys
- Pluggable schedulers
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dokku
- Running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with Heroku style deploymentnot Wasabi
- Moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic hasnot Wasabi
- A consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team Kubernetesnot Wasabi
- Keeping a legacy Procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stacknot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Dokku
- Media storagenot Dokku
- Archive replacementnot Dokku
- Ransomware protectionnot Dokku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dokku
- One maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- Dokku Pro asks 849 US dollars for a lifetime licence from a project with no disclosed legal entity behind the promise and no published refund terms, while the product is still described as in development at early bird pricing.
- Dokku is single-server by design, and the k3s scheduler that provides multi-node support is missing log retrieval, process inspection and content-based health checks, with a post-run hook the documentation says does not consistently fire.
- Supported operating systems are limited to Ubuntu 22.04 or 24.04 and Debian 11 or later, so organisations standardised on Red Hat, Rocky or Alma Linux cannot run it on their approved base image.
- Backups are separate commands per datastore plugin that you schedule yourself, with no unified snapshot, no point-in-time recovery and no tested restore path, so verifying that a restore works is entirely your responsibility.
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Dokku
Free- DokkuFree
- MIT licensed, no usage limits
- Command line and SSH only
- All datastore and certificate plugins
- Dokku Pro$849/one-time
- Lifetime licence with free upgrades and no subscription
- Covers 1 production and 2 pre-production servers
- Web dashboard and JSON REST API
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dokku if
- You need git push deploy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want heroku buildpacks.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Dokku or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dokku starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dokku or Wasabi?
- Dokku has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dokku and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Dokku or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Dokku runs on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Dokku for free?
- Yes. Dokku has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Dokku best used for?
- Dokku is most often used for running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with heroku style deployment, moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic has, a consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team kubernetes, keeping a legacy procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stack. Of those, running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with heroku style deployment and moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic has are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Dokku do that Wasabi cannot?
- Dokku covers Git push deploy, Heroku buildpacks, Datastore plugins, Automatic certificates. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dokku: Is Dokku still maintained?
Yes. Version 0.38.27 shipped in August 2026 with roughly six releases in the preceding two months. The caveat is that one maintainer writes nearly all of it.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceDokku: What does Dokku Pro give me over the free edition?
A web dashboard, a JSON REST API, git push over HTTPS, browser log tailing, team management and email support from the maintainers. It costs 849 US dollars once for one production and two pre-production servers.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceDokku: Can Dokku run across multiple servers?
Only through the k3s or Nomad schedulers. The k3s path is missing several commands and health check types, and the older Kubernetes scheduler is deprecated and no longer developed.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceDokku: Will my Heroku application run on it unchanged?
Usually. Dokku runs the same buildpacks and reads a Procfile, so the application layer normally moves across. Add-ons, scaling behaviour and backups are the parts you have to rebuild.
Wasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dokku vs Fly.io
- Dokku vs Render
- Dokku vs Heroku
- Dokku vs Coolify
- Dokku vs CapRover
- Dokku vs Qovery
- Dokku vs Porter
- Dokku vs Railway
- Dokku vs Northflank
- Dokku vs Podman
- Dokku vs Portworx
- Dokku vs minikube
- Dokku vs Scaleway
- Dokku vs SST
- Dokku vs Tencent Cloud
- Dokku vs Terragrunt
- Dokku vs Skopeo
- Dokku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Dokku vs DigitalOcean
- Dokku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Dokku vs Linode
- Dokku vs Vultr
- Dokku vs Zeabur
- Dokku vs Contabo
- Dokku vs Encore
- Dokku vs Google Cloud Platform
- Dokku vs Microsoft Azure
- Dokku vs HAProxy
- Dokku vs IBM Cloud
- Dokku vs kind
- Dokku vs Koyeb
- Dokku vs Kustomize
- Dokku vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Fly.io
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Coolify
- Wasabi vs CapRover
- Wasabi vs Qovery
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Railway
- Wasabi vs Northflank
- Wasabi vs Podman
- Wasabi vs Portworx
- Wasabi vs minikube
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs SST
- Wasabi vs Tencent Cloud
- Wasabi vs Terragrunt
- Wasabi vs Skopeo
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

