Cybersecurity · head to head
Descope vs Diligent

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Descope has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Descope free tier capped at 7,500 MAU; Pro tier at 10,000 MAU, Growth tier at 25,000 MAU, forcing migration to Enterprise for larger organisations; Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Descope and Diligent actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Descope
Nothing recorded that Diligent does not also cover.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Descope
- Organisations seeking rapid identity implementation without custom developmentnot Diligent
- Companies supporting multiple user types (consumers, partners, AI agents) in single platformnot Diligent
- Multi-tenant B2B2C SaaS applications requiring per-organisation identity policiesnot Diligent
- Teams building passwordless-first authentication experiencesnot Diligent
- Healthcare and regulated industries requiring HIPAA-compliant identity managementnot Diligent
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Descope
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Descope
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Descope
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Descope
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Descope
- Free tier capped at 7,500 MAU; Pro tier at 10,000 MAU, Growth tier at 25,000 MAU, forcing migration to Enterprise for larger organisations
- HIPAA compliance only available in Growth tier ($799/mo) and above; not included in lower-priced plans
- No-code UI builder provides pre-built flows but still requires custom frontend development for fully-branded authentication experiences
- All paid tiers billed annually; no monthly billing option for commitment-free flexibility
- Bot protection features available only in Growth tier and above
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Pricing, plan by plan
Descope
Free- Free ForeverFree
- 7,500 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Community support
- Pro$249/month
- 10,000 monthly active users
- Custom domains
- CI/CD integration
- Growth$799/month
- 25,000 monthly active users
- Bot protection
- Fine-grained authorisation
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited monthly active users
- Tiered discounts
- Premium support with dedicated CS engineer
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Questions people ask
- Is Descope or Diligent better?
- Neither clearly leads. Descope starts at Free and Diligent at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Descope or Diligent?
- Descope has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Descope and On request for Diligent.
- Does Descope or Diligent run on more platforms?
- Descope runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- Can I use Descope for free?
- Yes. Descope has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Descope best used for?
- Descope is most often used for organisations seeking rapid identity implementation without custom development, companies supporting multiple user types (consumers, partners, ai agents) in single platform, multi-tenant b2b2c saas applications requiring per-organisation identity policies, teams building passwordless-first authentication experiences. Of those, organisations seeking rapid identity implementation without custom development and companies supporting multiple user types (consumers, partners, ai agents) in single platform are not what Diligent is typically brought in for.
- What can Descope do that Diligent cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Descope: Can I build custom authentication flows without code?
Yes. Descope's drag-and-drop workflow interface allows you to construct and modify signup, login, MFA and SSO flows without code changes.
SourceDiligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Descope: Does Descope support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Descope supports building identity journeys for AI agents and MCP servers, including scoped OAuth tokens and delegation chains.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Descope: Is Descope HIPAA compliant?
HIPAA compliance is available in Growth tier and above, starting at $799/month.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Diligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Descope vs Transmit Security
- Descope vs 1Password
- Descope vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Descope vs Norton 360
- Descope vs LastPass
- Descope vs Cisco Duo
- Descope vs Akeyless
- Descope vs Endor Labs
- Descope vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Descope vs Stytch
- Descope vs Clerk
- Descope vs Private Internet Access
- Descope vs Arnica
- Descope vs Authelia
- Descope vs Authy
- Descope vs Baffle
- Descope vs Beyond Identity
- Descope vs BeyondTrust
- Descope vs LogicManager
- Descope vs Resolver
- Descope vs MetricStream
- Descope vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Descope vs Transcend
- Descope vs OneTrust
- Descope vs Milestone XProtect
- Descope vs Camio
- Descope vs Delinea
- Descope vs Dahua Technology
- Descope vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Descope vs IBM QRadar
- Descope vs Trivy
- Descope vs Trulioo
- Descope vs Unit21
- Descope vs Veracode
- Descope vs Very Good Security
- Descope vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs Transmit Security
- Diligent vs 1Password
- Diligent vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Diligent vs Norton 360
- Diligent vs LastPass
- Diligent vs Cisco Duo
- Diligent vs Akeyless
- Diligent vs Endor Labs
- Diligent vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Diligent vs Stytch
- Diligent vs Clerk
- Diligent vs Private Internet Access
- Diligent vs Arnica
- Diligent vs Authelia
- Diligent vs Authy
- Diligent vs Baffle
- Diligent vs Beyond Identity
- Diligent vs BeyondTrust
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station

