Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs TanStack Start

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

TanStack Start
Web Development
Full-stack React framework with type-safe server functions and TanStack Router
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; TanStack Start still in Release Candidate status, not yet production stable
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, TanStack Start covers Full-document SSR with streaming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and TanStack Start actually diverge.
| Attribute | Depot | TanStack Start |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | Cloud, GitHub, CLI | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
| Founded | 2022 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in TanStack Start
- Full-document SSR with streaming
- Type-safe server functions
- TanStack Router integration
- Middleware system
- Server routes and API endpoints
- Experimental RSC support
- Vite and Rsbuild support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot TanStack Start
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot TanStack Start
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot TanStack Start
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot TanStack Start
TanStack Start
- Building type-safe full-stack React applicationsnot Depot
- Projects requiring type safety across client and server boundariesnot Depot
- Applications leveraging advanced routing patterns and nested layoutsnot Depot
- Deployments across multiple platforms with consistent codebasenot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
TanStack Start
- Still in Release Candidate status, not yet production stable
- Smaller community compared to Next.js with less third-party support
- Documentation not as comprehensive as more established frameworks
- Less mature ecosystem for edge deployment compared to specialized frameworks
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
TanStack Start
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the TanStack Start review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose TanStack Start if
- You need full-document ssr with streaming.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want type-safe server functions.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or TanStack Start better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and TanStack Start at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or TanStack Start?
- Depot starts at Free and TanStack Start at Free.
- Does Depot or TanStack Start run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. TanStack Start runs on Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what TanStack Start is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that TanStack Start cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. TanStack Start covers Full-document SSR with streaming, Type-safe server functions, TanStack Router integration, Middleware system.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceTanStack Start: Is TanStack Start production-ready?
TanStack Start is currently in Release Candidate status. While functional and used in production by some teams, it has not yet reached stable v1.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceTanStack Start: How do type-safe server functions work in TanStack Start?
Server functions are automatically typed on the client side, enabling IDE autocomplete and type checking when calling server functions from client code.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceTanStack Start: What deployment platforms are supported by TanStack Start?
TanStack Start supports Cloudflare Workers, Node.js, Netlify, Railway, and other platforms through custom adapter configuration.
SourceRelated pages
More on TanStack Start
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Remix
- Depot vs SolidStart
- Depot vs Next.js
- Depot vs Bolt.new
- Depot vs Docusaurus
- Depot vs React
- Depot vs MUI
- Depot vs Radix UI
- Depot vs shadcn/ui
- Depot vs Chakra UI
- Depot vs Nuxt
- Depot vs Astro
- Depot vs Carrd
- Depot vs HTMX
- Depot vs Node.js
- Depot vs Wix
- Depot vs v0 by Vercel
- TanStack Start vs WarpBuild
- TanStack Start vs Blacksmith
- TanStack Start vs Nixpacks
- TanStack Start vs Buildkite
- TanStack Start vs GitLab CI/CD
- TanStack Start vs Namespace
- TanStack Start vs Earthly
- TanStack Start vs Nx Cloud
- TanStack Start vs Dagger
- TanStack Start vs Garden
- TanStack Start vs Ansible
- TanStack Start vs ConfigCat
- TanStack Start vs Avo
- TanStack Start vs Azure DevOps
- TanStack Start vs Backstage
- TanStack Start vs Bitbucket
- TanStack Start vs Claude Code
- TanStack Start vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- TanStack Start vs Remix
- TanStack Start vs SolidStart
- TanStack Start vs Next.js
- TanStack Start vs Bolt.new
- TanStack Start vs Docusaurus
- TanStack Start vs React
- TanStack Start vs MUI
- TanStack Start vs Radix UI
- TanStack Start vs shadcn/ui
- TanStack Start vs Chakra UI
- TanStack Start vs Nuxt
- TanStack Start vs Astro
- TanStack Start vs Carrd
- TanStack Start vs HTMX
- TanStack Start vs Node.js
- TanStack Start vs Wix
- TanStack Start vs v0 by Vercel
