Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs HTMX

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

HTMX
Web Development
Lightweight JavaScript library enabling AJAX, WebSockets, and server-sent events in HTML
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; HTMX best suited for server-rendered architectures, not pure client-side SPAs
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, HTMX covers AJAX requests.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and HTMX actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in HTMX
- AJAX requests
- HTTP verb support
- DOM targeting
- Swap strategies
- WebSocket support
- Server-sent events
- Out-of-band updates
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot HTMX
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot HTMX
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot HTMX
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot HTMX
HTMX
- Building interactive applications without JavaScript framework complexitynot Depot
- Server-rendered applications requiring dynamic updatesnot Depot
- Adding interactivity to existing server-side applicationsnot Depot
- Hypermedia-driven applications using HTML-first approachesnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
HTMX
- Best suited for server-rendered architectures, not pure client-side SPAs
- Limited client-side state management capabilities compared to frameworks
- Smaller ecosystem with fewer third-party libraries and tools
- Learning curve for developers from JavaScript framework backgrounds
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
HTMX
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the HTMX review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose HTMX if
- You need ajax requests.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want http verb support.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or HTMX better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and HTMX at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or HTMX?
- Depot starts at Free and HTMX at Free.
- Does Depot or HTMX run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. HTMX runs on Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what HTMX is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that HTMX cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. HTMX covers AJAX requests, HTTP verb support, DOM targeting, Swap strategies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceHTMX: How big is the HTMX JavaScript library?
HTMX is only 16 kilobytes minified and gzipped with zero external dependencies.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceHTMX: Can HTMX work with JSON APIs?
While HTMX is optimized for HTML responses, it can work with JSON through additional configuration and response handling.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceHTMX: Does HTMX support real-time features like WebSockets?
Yes, HTMX includes support for WebSockets and server-sent events for real-time bidirectional communication.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Alpine.js
- Depot vs React
- Depot vs Flask
- Depot vs FastAPI
- Depot vs Lit
- Depot vs Vue.js
- Depot vs Tailwind CSS
- Depot vs Remix
- Depot vs Astro
- Depot vs MUI
- Depot vs Angular
- Depot vs Chakra UI
- Depot vs Strikingly
- Depot vs Svelte
- Depot vs Turbopack
- Depot vs TypeScript
- Depot vs Nginx
- Depot vs Radix UI
- HTMX vs WarpBuild
- HTMX vs Blacksmith
- HTMX vs Nixpacks
- HTMX vs Buildkite
- HTMX vs GitLab CI/CD
- HTMX vs Namespace
- HTMX vs Earthly
- HTMX vs Nx Cloud
- HTMX vs Dagger
- HTMX vs Garden
- HTMX vs Ansible
- HTMX vs ConfigCat
- HTMX vs Avo
- HTMX vs Azure DevOps
- HTMX vs Backstage
- HTMX vs Bitbucket
- HTMX vs Claude Code
- HTMX vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- HTMX vs Alpine.js
- HTMX vs React
- HTMX vs Flask
- HTMX vs FastAPI
- HTMX vs Lit
- HTMX vs Vue.js
- HTMX vs Tailwind CSS
- HTMX vs Remix
- HTMX vs Astro
- HTMX vs MUI
- HTMX vs Angular
- HTMX vs Chakra UI
- HTMX vs Strikingly
- HTMX vs Svelte
- HTMX vs Turbopack
- HTMX vs TypeScript
- HTMX vs Nginx
- HTMX vs Radix UI
