Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Rhombus Systems

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Rhombus Systems
Cybersecurity
Cloud-managed cameras, sensors and access control with a per-camera annual licence
- From
- $149/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Depot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Rhombus Systems the per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Rhombus Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | Depot | Rhombus Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $149/year |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per camera per year licence plus hardware |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, GitHub, CLI | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2022 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Rhombus Systems
- On-camera storage
- No NVR or server
- AI search
- Access control
- Environmental sensors
- Unlimited users
- Ten year hardware warranty
- Optional cloud archiving
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Rhombus Systems
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Rhombus Systems
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Rhombus Systems
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Rhombus Systems
Rhombus Systems
- A school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local IT at each sitenot Depot
- A clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trailnot Depot
- A logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footagenot Depot
- An office estate replacing ageing NVRs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain themnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Rhombus Systems
- The per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- Cameras must be Rhombus, so there is no reuse of existing IP cameras and migrating away means replacing every device rather than changing software.
- Cloud archiving is priced separately by retention and stream count, and long retention on multisensor cameras runs into five figures per camera, which can dwarf everything else in the quote.
- On-camera storage is the default retention, so a camera physically stolen or destroyed takes its unarchived footage with it unless cloud archiving was paid for on that camera.
- Analytics and integrations are good for mid-market needs but shallower than a dedicated enterprise VMS with a large third-party ecosystem, so specialist requirements like advanced LPR or forensic search hit limits.
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Rhombus Systems
$149/year- Professional$149/year
- Per camera per year
- Cloud console and management
- On-camera storage retention
- Enterprise$199/year
- Per camera per year
- Everything in Professional
- Flexible cloud archiving options
- Cloud archiving$undefined/year
- Priced separately by retention period and stream count
- Multisensor cameras cost several times a single sensor camera
- Long retention on multisensor models can reach five figures per camera
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Rhombus Systems if
- You need on-camera storage.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no nvr or server.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Rhombus Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Rhombus Systems at $149/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Rhombus Systems?
- Depot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Depot and $149/year for Rhombus Systems.
- Does Depot or Rhombus Systems run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Rhombus Systems runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Yes. Depot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Rhombus Systems starts at $149/year.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Rhombus Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Rhombus Systems cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, No NVR or server, AI search, Access control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceRhombus Systems: Do I need an NVR or a server?
No. Cameras record on board and connect directly to the cloud console, which is the main operational reason organisations pick it.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceRhombus Systems: What does the licence cost?
Roughly $149 per camera per year for Professional and about $199 for Enterprise, typically sold in one, three, five or ten year terms.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRhombus Systems: Is cloud storage included?
No. On-camera storage is the default. Cloud archiving is a separate charge priced by retention duration and number of streams.
Rhombus Systems: Can I use my existing cameras?
No. The platform works only with Rhombus hardware, which is the trade-off for the zero-server architecture.
Related pages
More on Rhombus Systems
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Spot AI
- Depot vs Salient CompleteView
- Depot vs Milestone XProtect
- Depot vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Depot vs DTiQ
- Depot vs Motorola Vigilant
- Depot vs Genetec Security Center
- Depot vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Depot vs Camio
- Depot vs Dahua Technology
- Depot vs March Networks
- Depot vs Envysion
- Depot vs Avast One
- Depot vs Chainguard
- Depot vs Cosign
- Depot vs CyberGhost VPN
- Depot vs Descope
- Rhombus Systems vs WarpBuild
- Rhombus Systems vs Blacksmith
- Rhombus Systems vs Nixpacks
- Rhombus Systems vs Buildkite
- Rhombus Systems vs GitLab CI/CD
- Rhombus Systems vs Namespace
- Rhombus Systems vs Earthly
- Rhombus Systems vs Nx Cloud
- Rhombus Systems vs Dagger
- Rhombus Systems vs Garden
- Rhombus Systems vs Ansible
- Rhombus Systems vs ConfigCat
- Rhombus Systems vs Avo
- Rhombus Systems vs Azure DevOps
- Rhombus Systems vs Backstage
- Rhombus Systems vs Bitbucket
- Rhombus Systems vs Claude Code
- Rhombus Systems vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Rhombus Systems vs Spot AI
- Rhombus Systems vs Salient CompleteView
- Rhombus Systems vs Milestone XProtect
- Rhombus Systems vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Rhombus Systems vs DTiQ
- Rhombus Systems vs Motorola Vigilant
- Rhombus Systems vs Genetec Security Center
- Rhombus Systems vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Camio
- Rhombus Systems vs Dahua Technology
- Rhombus Systems vs March Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Envysion
- Rhombus Systems vs Avast One
- Rhombus Systems vs Chainguard
- Rhombus Systems vs Cosign
- Rhombus Systems vs CyberGhost VPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Descope
