Cloud · head to head
Deno Deploy vs Portworx

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Deno Deploy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Deno Deploy smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations; Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- They diverge on capability: Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Portworx covers Container-native volumes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno Deploy and Portworx actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deno Deploy | Portworx |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $0.33/node hour |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per node hour |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud/Web | Linux |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot Portworx
- Edge functionsnot Portworx
- Static sitesnot Portworx
- Real-time appsnot Portworx
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Deno Deploy
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Deno Deploy
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Deno Deploy
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Deno Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Which should you pick?
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud/Web.
- You also want deno kv.
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Questions people ask
- Is Deno Deploy or Portworx better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno Deploy starts at Free and Portworx at $0.33/node hour, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno Deploy or Portworx?
- Deno Deploy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Deno Deploy and $0.33/node hour for Portworx.
- Does Deno Deploy or Portworx run on more platforms?
- Deno Deploy runs on Cloud/Web. Portworx runs on Linux.
- Can I use Deno Deploy for free?
- Yes. Deno Deploy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour.
- What is Deno Deploy best used for?
- Deno Deploy is most often used for api endpoints, edge functions, static sites, real-time apps. Of those, api endpoints and edge functions are not what Portworx is typically brought in for.
- What can Deno Deploy do that Portworx cannot?
- Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution. Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourcePortworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Deno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Deno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourcePortworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Deno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Deno Deploy
Other head to heads
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Cerebrium
- Deno Deploy vs Beam Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Serverless Framework
- Deno Deploy vs Koyeb
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Fly.io
- Deno Deploy vs Fireworks AI
- Deno Deploy vs Fastly
- Deno Deploy vs Oracle Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Orca Security
- Deno Deploy vs Packer
- Deno Deploy vs Porter
- Deno Deploy vs Rook
- Deno Deploy vs OpenEBS
- Deno Deploy vs Rancher
- Deno Deploy vs Longhorn
- Deno Deploy vs Podman
- Deno Deploy vs Scaleway
- Deno Deploy vs DigitalOcean
- Deno Deploy vs Crossplane
- Deno Deploy vs Dokku
- Deno Deploy vs Encore
- Deno Deploy vs Google Cloud Platform
- Deno Deploy vs K3s
- Deno Deploy vs Flux
- Deno Deploy vs Vagrant
- Deno Deploy vs Kustomize
- Deno Deploy vs minikube
- Portworx vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Portworx vs Upstash
- Portworx vs Cerebrium
- Portworx vs Beam Cloud
- Portworx vs Serverless Framework
- Portworx vs Koyeb
- Portworx vs Neon
- Portworx vs Pulumi
- Portworx vs Render
- Portworx vs Fly.io
- Portworx vs Fireworks AI
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Oracle Cloud
- Portworx vs Orca Security
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Porter
- Portworx vs Rook
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube

