Cloud · head to head
Cerebrium vs Portworx

Cerebrium
Cloud
Serverless GPU infrastructure for real-time AI inference and applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cerebrium has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cerebrium free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency; Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- They diverge on capability: Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Portworx covers Container-native volumes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerebrium and Portworx actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerebrium
- Ultra-fast cold starts
- Elastic scaling
- Bring your own code
- Multi-region failover
- WebSocket and streaming
- Asynchronous jobs
- CI/CD with gradual rollouts
- OpenTelemetry integration
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerebrium
- Deploying voice agents and conversational AI applicationsnot Portworx
- Video and image model serving with low latencynot Portworx
- LLM inference and completion endpointsnot Portworx
- Real-time embeddings and vector database operationsnot Portworx
- Distributed model training with hyperparameter sweepsnot Portworx
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Cerebrium
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Cerebrium
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Cerebrium
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Cerebrium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerebrium
- Free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard plan at $100/month required for production deployments
- Per-second compute pricing requires continuous cost monitoring
- Storage costs add up for large model files
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerebrium
Free- HobbyFree
- 3 user seats
- Up to 3 deployed apps
- 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard$100/month
- Unlimited seats and apps
- 30 GPU concurrency
- Custom domains
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Unlimited resources
- Volume discounts
- Dedicated support
- GPU Compute$undefined/per-second
- T4: $0.000164/s
- H100: $0.00167/s
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerebrium if
- You need ultra-fast cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker.
- You also want elastic scaling.
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerebrium or Portworx better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerebrium starts at Free and Portworx at $0.33/node hour, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerebrium or Portworx?
- Cerebrium has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cerebrium and $0.33/node hour for Portworx.
- Does Cerebrium or Portworx run on more platforms?
- Cerebrium runs on Cloud, Docker. Portworx runs on Linux.
- Can I use Cerebrium for free?
- Yes. Cerebrium has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour.
- What is Cerebrium best used for?
- Cerebrium is most often used for deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications, video and image model serving with low latency, llm inference and completion endpoints, real-time embeddings and vector database operations. Of those, deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications and video and image model serving with low latency are not what Portworx is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerebrium do that Portworx cannot?
- Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Elastic scaling, Bring your own code, Multi-region failover. Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cerebrium: Is Cerebrium only for inference or can it train models?
Cerebrium supports both inference serving and model training with hyperparameter sweeps. It enables deployment of voice agents, LLMs, video models, and other AI applications.
SourcePortworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Cerebrium: How do the cold starts compare to other platforms?
Cerebrium achieves 2-4 second cold starts through memory and GPU snapshotting, significantly faster than traditional 30+ second cold boots. This is competitive with platforms like Beam Cloud.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Cerebrium: What compliance certifications does Cerebrium have?
Cerebrium maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance, HIPAA certification, GDPR compliance, and ISO certification. It provides gVisor container isolation and configurable data residency for regulated workloads.
SourcePortworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cerebrium vs Beam Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Lambda
- Cerebrium vs Anyscale
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs Deno Deploy
- Cerebrium vs Serverless Framework
- Cerebrium vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cerebrium vs Upstash
- Cerebrium vs Neon
- Cerebrium vs Fireworks AI
- Cerebrium vs Porter
- Cerebrium vs Fastly
- Cerebrium vs Flux
- Cerebrium vs Google Cloud Platform
- Cerebrium vs HAProxy
- Cerebrium vs IBM Cloud
- Cerebrium vs kind
- Cerebrium vs OpenEBS
- Cerebrium vs Rancher
- Cerebrium vs Longhorn
- Cerebrium vs Podman
- Cerebrium vs Scaleway
- Cerebrium vs DigitalOcean
- Cerebrium vs Packer
- Cerebrium vs Crossplane
- Cerebrium vs Dokku
- Cerebrium vs Encore
- Cerebrium vs K3s
- Cerebrium vs Vagrant
- Cerebrium vs Kustomize
- Cerebrium vs minikube
- Portworx vs Beam Cloud
- Portworx vs Lambda
- Portworx vs Anyscale
- Portworx vs Koyeb
- Portworx vs Deno Deploy
- Portworx vs Serverless Framework
- Portworx vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Portworx vs Upstash
- Portworx vs Neon
- Portworx vs Fireworks AI
- Portworx vs Porter
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs HAProxy
- Portworx vs IBM Cloud
- Portworx vs kind
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube
