Cloud · head to head
Portworx vs Pulumi

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -

Pulumi
Cloud
Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Pulumi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.; Pulumi the free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- They diverge on capability: Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Pulumi covers Multi-language support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Portworx and Pulumi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
Only in Pulumi
- Multi-language support
- Multi-cloud
- State management
- Secrets management
- RBAC
- Stacks
- Automation API
- Policy as Code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Pulumi
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Pulumi
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Pulumi
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Pulumi
Pulumi
- Infrastructure as codenot Portworx
- Cloud resource provisioningnot Portworx
- DevOps automationnot Portworx
- Multi-cloud managementnot Portworx
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pulumi
- The free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- The Team plan is $40 per month base including 40 credits, and caps the organisation at 10 users
- SAML/SSO, RBAC, audit logs and drift detection require the Enterprise plan at $400 per month base
- The per-resource rate rises from $0.1825 per resource per month on Team to $0.365 on Enterprise, so upgrading raises the unit price as well as the base fee
- Managed secrets are billed separately at $0.50 per secret per month on Team and $0.75 on Enterprise
- Self-hosting, SCIM user sync, audit log export and 24x7 support are only in Business Critical, which is custom priced with no published rate
- Team includes up to 500 resources and Enterprise up to 2,000, with everything beyond billed on demand as credits
Pricing, plan by plan
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Pulumi
Free- IndividualFree
- 1 user
- Unlimited projects/stacks
- 500 workflow minutes monthly
- Team$40/month
- Up to 10 users
- Secure collaboration
- CI/CD integration
- Enterprise$400/month
- Unlimited users
- SAML/SSO
- RBAC
- Business Critical$null/custom
- Self-hosting
- Advanced compliance
- SCIM integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Choose Pulumi if
- You need multi-language support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want multi-cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Portworx or Pulumi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour and Pulumi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Portworx or Pulumi?
- Pulumi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.33/node hour for Portworx and Free for Pulumi.
- Does Portworx or Pulumi run on more platforms?
- Portworx runs on Linux. Pulumi runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- Can I use Pulumi for free?
- Yes. Pulumi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour.
- What is Portworx best used for?
- Portworx is most often used for running a production postgresql or cassandra cluster on kubernetes and needing the data to survive node loss, a platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal kubernetes platform, failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery position, an openshift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful sets. Of those, running a production postgresql or cassandra cluster on kubernetes and needing the data to survive node loss and a platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal kubernetes platform are not what Pulumi is typically brought in for.
- What can Portworx do that Pulumi cannot?
- Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation. Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Multi-cloud, State management, Secrets management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Portworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Pulumi: How much does Pulumi cost?
Pulumi offers a free Individual tier forever, Team plan at $40/month with 40 credits, and Enterprise at $400/month with 400 credits. Credit usage varies by resource type and workflow needs.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Pulumi: What is included in the Pulumi free tier?
The free Individual tier includes 1 user, unlimited projects/stacks, 500 workflow minutes monthly, and 5 million Neo tokens free.
SourcePortworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Pulumi: How are Pulumi credits charged?
1 Pulumi Credit equals $1 USD. Credits are drawn from a shared pool. IaC resources cost $0.1825/month per resource on Team and $0.365 on Enterprise; ESC secrets cost $0.50-$0.75/month; workflow minutes cost $0.01 each.
SourcePulumi: Does Pulumi offer volume discounts?
Yes, the Enterprise tier ($400/month) includes volume discounts and is designed for approximately 2,000 IaC resources.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube
- Portworx vs SST
- Portworx vs Terragrunt
- Portworx vs Serverless Framework
- Portworx vs Nitric
- Portworx vs Neon
- Portworx vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Portworx vs Grafana Cloud
- Portworx vs Oracle Cloud
- Portworx vs Orca Security
- Portworx vs Porter
- Portworx vs Rook
- Pulumi vs OpenEBS
- Pulumi vs Rancher
- Pulumi vs Longhorn
- Pulumi vs Podman
- Pulumi vs Scaleway
- Pulumi vs DigitalOcean
- Pulumi vs Packer
- Pulumi vs Crossplane
- Pulumi vs Dokku
- Pulumi vs Encore
- Pulumi vs Fastly
- Pulumi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Pulumi vs K3s
- Pulumi vs Flux
- Pulumi vs Vagrant
- Pulumi vs Kustomize
- Pulumi vs minikube
- Pulumi vs SST
- Pulumi vs Terragrunt
- Pulumi vs Serverless Framework
- Pulumi vs Nitric
- Pulumi vs Neon
- Pulumi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Pulumi vs Grafana Cloud
- Pulumi vs Oracle Cloud
- Pulumi vs Orca Security
- Pulumi vs Porter
- Pulumi vs Rook
