Cybersecurity · head to head
Dahua Technology vs Sumsub

Dahua Technology
Cybersecurity
Large Chinese video platform that US federal buyers and federal contractors cannot lawfully use
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dahua Technology dahua is named under NDAA Section 889 and listed on the FCC Covered List, so the US federal government cannot procure its video surveillance equipment and cannot contract with entities that use it, which disqualifies most organisations with any federal contracting ambition regardless of how good the software is.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: Dahua Technology covers DSS Pro V8, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dahua Technology and Sumsub actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dahua Technology | Sumsub |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.35/verification |
| Pricing model | quote | Per verification |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dahua Technology
- DSS Pro V8
- Distributed architecture
- DeepXplore
- Access management
- Parking Lot application
- Intelligent Analysis
- Maintenance Center
- DMSS mobile app
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dahua Technology
- A private industrial site outside the United States with no federal or defence supply chain exposurenot Sumsub
- A large-channel-count deployment in a market where Section 889 and the FCC Covered List do not applynot Sumsub
- An existing Dahua estate authorised before February 2023 being maintained rather than expandednot Sumsub
- A buyer who has taken written legal advice confirming no federal contracting exposure now or in futurenot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot Dahua Technology
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot Dahua Technology
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot Dahua Technology
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot Dahua Technology
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dahua Technology
- Dahua is named under NDAA Section 889 and listed on the FCC Covered List, so the US federal government cannot procure its video surveillance equipment and cannot contract with entities that use it, which disqualifies most organisations with any federal contracting ambition regardless of how good the software is.
- Rules adopted by the FCC in late 2025 gave the Commission authority to revoke equipment authorisations already granted, so equipment that is legal to sell today may not be tomorrow and a multi-year rollout carries regulatory risk the vendor cannot indemnify.
- Sourcing has degraded sharply: new equipment, replacement parts and system expansions are increasingly difficult to obtain through compliant US distribution and major retailers have removed listings, so an installed estate faces a spares problem long before end of life.
- Any organisation that later wins or bids for federal work, or supplies a federal contractor, must audit and replace Dahua equipment across all its facilities under Section 889(a)(1)(B), turning a cheap installation into an expensive forced rip-out.
- Beyond procurement law, insurers, auditors and enterprise customers increasingly treat Chinese-manufactured surveillance as a supply chain finding in its own right, so the reputational cost lands even where the legal prohibition does not.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dahua Technology
On request- DSS Pro V8$undefined/year
- Base video licence covering 16 channels, required before adding more
- Additional video channel licences purchased per channel
- Access control, video intercom and parking licensed separately
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Dahua Technology if
- You need dss pro v8.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want distributed architecture.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is Dahua Technology or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dahua Technology starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dahua Technology or Sumsub?
- Dahua Technology starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does Dahua Technology or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- Dahua Technology runs on Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Dahua Technology best used for?
- Dahua Technology is most often used for a private industrial site outside the united states with no federal or defence supply chain exposure, a large-channel-count deployment in a market where section 889 and the fcc covered list do not apply, an existing dahua estate authorised before february 2023 being maintained rather than expanded, a buyer who has taken written legal advice confirming no federal contracting exposure now or in future. Of those, a private industrial site outside the united states with no federal or defence supply chain exposure and a large-channel-count deployment in a market where section 889 and the fcc covered list do not apply are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can Dahua Technology do that Sumsub cannot?
- Dahua Technology covers DSS Pro V8, Distributed architecture, DeepXplore, Access management. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dahua Technology: Can a US federal agency buy Dahua?
No. Dahua is explicitly named under NDAA Section 889, so federal agencies cannot procure or obtain its video surveillance equipment, including OEM-rebadged versions.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
Dahua Technology: Can a private US company use Dahua cameras?
Section 889 does not directly regulate private companies without federal contracts, and existing installations are not required to be removed. But the moment the company bids for federal work or supplies a federal contractor, Section 889(a)(1)(B) makes the installed equipment a problem.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
Dahua Technology: Is existing Dahua equipment banned?
No. The prohibition on new authorisations does not apply retroactively to equipment authorised before February 2023, and legacy systems may remain in use. New purchases and expansions are the restricted part.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
Dahua Technology: Is Dahua available outside the United States?
Yes, and it remains one of the two largest manufacturers globally, though a number of other countries have introduced their own restrictions on government use.
Related pages
More on Dahua Technology
Other head to heads
- Dahua Technology vs Hanwha Vision
- Dahua Technology vs March Networks
- Dahua Technology vs Genetec Security Center
- Dahua Technology vs Milestone XProtect
- Dahua Technology vs Salient CompleteView
- Dahua Technology vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Dahua Technology vs Rhombus Systems
- Dahua Technology vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Dahua Technology vs Envysion
- Dahua Technology vs Delinea
- Dahua Technology vs Ping Identity
- Dahua Technology vs Feedzai
- Dahua Technology vs Tenable
- Dahua Technology vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Dahua Technology vs TunnelBear
- Dahua Technology vs Vanta
- Dahua Technology vs Acunetix
- Dahua Technology vs Aikido
- Dahua Technology vs Shufti Pro
- Dahua Technology vs Jumio
- Dahua Technology vs Socure
- Dahua Technology vs Signicat
- Dahua Technology vs iDenfy
- Dahua Technology vs Trulioo
- Dahua Technology vs Veriff
- Dahua Technology vs IDnow
- Dahua Technology vs Quantexa
- Dahua Technology vs Fenergo
- Dahua Technology vs NICE Actimize
- Dahua Technology vs Yoti
- Dahua Technology vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Dahua Technology vs Mimecast
- Dahua Technology vs Motorola Vigilant
- Dahua Technology vs Nessus
- Dahua Technology vs NordPass
- Dahua Technology vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Hanwha Vision
- Sumsub vs March Networks
- Sumsub vs Genetec Security Center
- Sumsub vs Milestone XProtect
- Sumsub vs Salient CompleteView
- Sumsub vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Sumsub vs Rhombus Systems
- Sumsub vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Sumsub vs Envysion
- Sumsub vs Delinea
- Sumsub vs Ping Identity
- Sumsub vs Feedzai
- Sumsub vs Tenable
- Sumsub vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Sumsub vs TunnelBear
- Sumsub vs Vanta
- Sumsub vs Acunetix
- Sumsub vs Aikido
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
