Cloud · head to head
Puppet vs UrBackup

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Puppet no pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Puppet covers Manifests, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Puppet and UrBackup actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Puppet
- Manifests
- Modules
- Classes
- Variables
- Facts
- Puppet Master
- Hiera
- Facter
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Puppet
- Infrastructure automationnot UrBackup
- Configuration managementnot UrBackup
- DevOps at scalenot UrBackup
- Enterprise infrastructurenot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Puppet
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Puppet
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Puppet
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Puppet
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Puppet
- No pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales
- Enterprise and Advanced tiers require custom quote
- Free tier limited to 25 nodes maximum
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Puppet
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 25 nodes
- Core Commercial$null/custom
- 25+ nodes
- Vendor-backed SLAs
- Training with Certified Engineers
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Web GUI
- RBAC
- Multi-environment support
- Advanced$null/custom
- AI-powered features
- Advanced patching
- Vulnerability remediation
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Puppet if
- You need manifests.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want modules.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Puppet or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Puppet starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Puppet or UrBackup?
- Puppet starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Puppet or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Puppet runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Puppet for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Puppet best used for?
- Puppet is most often used for infrastructure automation, configuration management, devops at scale, enterprise infrastructure. Of those, infrastructure automation and configuration management are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Puppet do that UrBackup cannot?
- Puppet covers Manifests, Modules, Classes, Variables. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Puppet: How much does Puppet cost?
Puppet's Developer tier is free for up to 25 nodes. Commercial, Enterprise, and Advanced tiers require contacting their sales team for a custom quote.
SourceUrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
Puppet: Is there a free version of Puppet?
Yes, Puppet's Developer tier is free forever for up to 25 nodes of infrastructure.
SourceUrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
Puppet: What does the Enterprise tier include?
Puppet's Enterprise tier includes web GUI, RBAC, and multi-environment support for organizations managing infrastructure at scale, with pricing available upon request.
SourceUrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Puppet vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Puppet vs DigitalOcean
- Puppet vs Grafana Cloud
- Puppet vs Neon
- Puppet vs Chef
- Puppet vs Packer
- Puppet vs Google Cloud Platform
- Puppet vs Microsoft Azure
- Puppet vs Lambda
- Puppet vs Oracle Cloud
- Puppet vs Akamai
- Puppet vs IBM Cloud
- Puppet vs Jaeger
- Puppet vs Linode
- Puppet vs Northflank
- Puppet vs Longhorn
- Puppet vs minikube
- Puppet vs Bacula
- Puppet vs Velero
- Puppet vs Kopia
- Puppet vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Puppet vs Clonezilla
- Puppet vs Amanda Enterprise
- Puppet vs rustic
- Puppet vs BDRShield
- Puppet vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Puppet vs Borg Backup
- Puppet vs Restic
- Puppet vs Clumio
- Puppet vs Cohesity
- Puppet vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Puppet vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- UrBackup vs DigitalOcean
- UrBackup vs Grafana Cloud
- UrBackup vs Neon
- UrBackup vs Chef
- UrBackup vs Packer
- UrBackup vs Google Cloud Platform
- UrBackup vs Microsoft Azure
- UrBackup vs Lambda
- UrBackup vs Oracle Cloud
- UrBackup vs Akamai
- UrBackup vs IBM Cloud
- UrBackup vs Jaeger
- UrBackup vs Linode
- UrBackup vs Northflank
- UrBackup vs Longhorn
- UrBackup vs minikube
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

