File Storage & Backup · head to head
CrashPlan vs Packer

CrashPlan
File Storage & Backup
Endpoint backup designed for work-from-anywhere
- From
- $8/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Packer has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CrashPlan initial data uploads can be noticeably slow, often taking several full days for complete system backups; Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: CrashPlan covers Automatic backup, Packer covers Image building.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CrashPlan and Packer actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CrashPlan
- Automatic backup
- Continuous protection
- Legal hold
- Centralized administration
- Unlimited storage
- AES 256-bit encryption
- Active Directory
- LDAP
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
Both cover
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CrashPlan
- Data protectionnot Packer
- Disaster recoverynot Packer
- Business continuitynot Packer
- Ransomware protectionnot Packer
- Compliancenot Packer
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot CrashPlan
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot CrashPlan
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot CrashPlan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CrashPlan
- Initial data uploads can be noticeably slow, often taking several full days for complete system backups
- Occasional slow restore speeds for very large files impact recovery time objectives
- Full system recovery requires requesting hard drive delivery instead of bare-metal restore capability
- Difficulties reported with backing up or restoring data from external hard drives
- Pricing is higher than some competitors like Backblaze when compared per user/month
- Limited SIEM integration and governance reporting for enterprise environments
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Pricing, plan by plan
CrashPlan
$8/month- Professional (Monthly)$8/month
- Unlimited backup capacity
- Unlimited file versions
- 90-day deleted file retention
- Professional (Annual)$88/year
- All Monthly features
- $0.88 savings per month vs monthly billing
- Professional (2-Year)$158/2 years
- All features
- Lower per-month cost vs annual
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose CrashPlan if
- You need automatic backup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Cloud (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace).
- You also want continuous protection.
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Questions people ask
- Is CrashPlan or Packer better?
- Neither clearly leads. CrashPlan starts at $8/month and Packer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CrashPlan or Packer?
- Packer has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $8/month for CrashPlan and Free for Packer.
- Does CrashPlan or Packer run on more platforms?
- CrashPlan runs on Windows, macOS, Cloud (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace). Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Packer for free?
- Yes. Packer has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CrashPlan starts at $8/month.
- What is CrashPlan best used for?
- CrashPlan is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Packer is typically brought in for.
- What can CrashPlan do that Packer cannot?
- CrashPlan covers Automatic backup, Continuous protection, Legal hold, Centralized administration. Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders. Both handle Windows support, Linux support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CrashPlan: What is CrashPlan's pricing for business backup?
CrashPlan Professional Edition costs $8 per user/month (billed monthly), $7.33 per user/month when billed annually ($88/year), or $158 per user for a 2-year commitment. This includes unlimited backup capacity, unlimited file versions, and 90-day deleted file retention.
SourceCrashPlan: Does CrashPlan offer a free trial?
Yes, CrashPlan offers a 14-day free trial. Credit card information is required for signup, but there will be no charge if you cancel during the trial period. Your credit card will be automatically charged when the trial ends unless you cancel.
SourceCrashPlan: What platforms and services does CrashPlan protect?
CrashPlan protects Windows and Mac endpoints, Microsoft 365 services (Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams), and Google Workspace (Gmail, Google Drive). The platform provides backup for endpoints, servers, and cloud applications.
SourceCrashPlan: Does CrashPlan have a free version for consumers?
No, CrashPlan discontinued its consumer personal backup tier and now focuses exclusively on commercial businesses. The platform is strictly for business and organizational use.
SourceCrashPlan: What is CrashPlan's partnership status with Microsoft?
CrashPlan is a trusted Microsoft Partner and is co-sell eligible. The platform is available in the Microsoft Marketplace and counts toward customers' Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC). CrashPlan is built on Microsoft Azure infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CrashPlan vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- CrashPlan vs Carbonite
- CrashPlan vs Backblaze
- CrashPlan vs Barracuda Backup
- CrashPlan vs Arq Backup
- CrashPlan vs Duplicati
- CrashPlan vs Zerto
- CrashPlan vs Box
- CrashPlan vs IDrive
- CrashPlan vs Microsoft OneDrive
- CrashPlan vs Nextcloud
- CrashPlan vs pCloud
- CrashPlan vs Sync.com
- CrashPlan vs Tresorit
- CrashPlan vs TrueNAS
- CrashPlan vs Veritas NetBackup
- CrashPlan vs Grafana Cloud
- CrashPlan vs Neon
- CrashPlan vs DigitalOcean
- CrashPlan vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- CrashPlan vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- CrashPlan vs Deno Deploy
- CrashPlan vs Heroku
- CrashPlan vs Hetzner Cloud
- CrashPlan vs Linode
- CrashPlan vs Pulumi
- CrashPlan vs Render
- CrashPlan vs Upstash
- CrashPlan vs Vagrant
- CrashPlan vs Vultr
- CrashPlan vs Akamai
- CrashPlan vs Alibaba Cloud
- CrashPlan vs Chef
- CrashPlan vs Contabo
- Packer vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Packer vs Carbonite
- Packer vs Backblaze
- Packer vs Barracuda Backup
- Packer vs Arq Backup
- Packer vs Duplicati
- Packer vs Zerto
- Packer vs Box
- Packer vs IDrive
- Packer vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Packer vs Nextcloud
- Packer vs pCloud
- Packer vs Sync.com
- Packer vs Tresorit
- Packer vs TrueNAS
- Packer vs Veritas NetBackup
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Packer vs Deno Deploy
- Packer vs Heroku
- Packer vs Hetzner Cloud
- Packer vs Linode
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Render
- Packer vs Upstash
- Packer vs Vagrant
- Packer vs Vultr
- Packer vs Akamai
- Packer vs Alibaba Cloud
- Packer vs Chef
- Packer vs Contabo
