Software · head to head
IDrive vs Packer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IDrive the advertised annual rates are first year introductory prices, with standard pricing applying from the second year onward; Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: IDrive covers Multiple device backup, Packer covers Image building.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IDrive and Packer actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IDrive
- Multiple device backup
- True archiving
- Continuous protection
- IDrive Express
- Snapshots
- File sharing
- iOS
- Android
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
Both cover
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IDrive
- Online backup for computers, servers and mobile devicesnot Packer
- Backing up multiple machines under one accountnot Packer
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot IDrive
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot IDrive
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot IDrive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IDrive
- The advertised annual rates are first year introductory prices, with standard pricing applying from the second year onward
- The two year offer discounts only the first year, so the second year reverts to the full rate
- Team plans tie user and computer counts to the storage tier, so 10 TB means exactly 10 computers
- Business storage costs far more per terabyte than Personal, at $719.88 a year for 1.25 TB against $143.88 for 5 TB
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Pricing, plan by plan
IDrive
Free- Personal$4/month
- 5TB storage
- Unlimited devices
- IDrive Express
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose IDrive if
- You need multiple device backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux, Web.
- You also want true archiving.
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Questions people ask
- Is IDrive or Packer better?
- Neither clearly leads. IDrive starts at Free and Packer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IDrive or Packer?
- IDrive starts at Free and Packer at Free.
- Does IDrive or Packer run on more platforms?
- IDrive runs on Windows, Mac, Linux, Web. Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use IDrive for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is IDrive best used for?
- IDrive is most often used for online backup for computers, servers and mobile devices, backing up multiple machines under one account. Of those, online backup for computers, servers and mobile devices and backing up multiple machines under one account are not what Packer is typically brought in for.
- What can IDrive do that Packer cannot?
- IDrive covers Multiple device backup, True archiving, Continuous protection, IDrive Express. Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders. Both handle Windows support, Linux support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- IDrive vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- IDrive vs Carbonite
- IDrive vs Backblaze
- IDrive vs Barracuda Backup
- IDrive vs Arq Backup
- IDrive vs CrashPlan
- IDrive vs Duplicati
- IDrive vs Zerto
- IDrive vs Box
- IDrive vs Microsoft OneDrive
- IDrive vs Nextcloud
- IDrive vs pCloud
- IDrive vs Sync.com
- IDrive vs Tresorit
- IDrive vs TrueNAS
- IDrive vs Veritas NetBackup
- IDrive vs Grafana Cloud
- IDrive vs Neon
- IDrive vs DigitalOcean
- IDrive vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- IDrive vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- IDrive vs Deno Deploy
- IDrive vs Heroku
- IDrive vs Hetzner Cloud
- IDrive vs Linode
- IDrive vs Pulumi
- IDrive vs Render
- IDrive vs Upstash
- IDrive vs Vagrant
- IDrive vs Vultr
- IDrive vs Akamai
- IDrive vs Alibaba Cloud
- IDrive vs Chef
- IDrive vs Contabo
- Packer vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Packer vs Carbonite
- Packer vs Backblaze
- Packer vs Barracuda Backup
- Packer vs Arq Backup
- Packer vs CrashPlan
- Packer vs Duplicati
- Packer vs Zerto
- Packer vs Box
- Packer vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Packer vs Nextcloud
- Packer vs pCloud
- Packer vs Sync.com
- Packer vs Tresorit
- Packer vs TrueNAS
- Packer vs Veritas NetBackup
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Packer vs Deno Deploy
- Packer vs Heroku
- Packer vs Hetzner Cloud
- Packer vs Linode
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Render
- Packer vs Upstash
- Packer vs Vagrant
- Packer vs Vultr
- Packer vs Akamai
- Packer vs Alibaba Cloud
- Packer vs Chef
- Packer vs Contabo

