Databases · head to head
MariaDB vs turbopuffer

MariaDB
Databases
The open source relational database for the enterprise
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

turbopuffer
Databases
Closed-source vector and full-text search service built directly on object storage, with cold queries measured in seconds rather than milliseconds.
- From
- $16/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MariaDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MariaDB jSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions; turbopuffer a cold namespace pays object storage latency on the first query, with a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents, so any interactive search box needs the data kept warm or the user waits about a second.
- They diverge on capability: MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility, turbopuffer covers Object storage architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MariaDB and turbopuffer actually diverge.
| Attribute | MariaDB | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MariaDB
- MySQL Compatibility
- Aria Storage Engine
- ColumnStore
- Galera Cluster
- MaxScale
- Spider Engine
- Temporal Tables
- phpMyAdmin
Only in turbopuffer
- Object storage architecture
- Namespaces
- Vector search
- Full-text search
- Attribute filtering
- Documented limits
- Configurable consistency
- Durable writes
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MariaDB
- Transaction processingnot turbopuffer
- Data storagenot turbopuffer
- Application backendnot turbopuffer
- Reportingnot turbopuffer
- Data analyticsnot turbopuffer
turbopuffer
- A product with one search index per customer and thousands of customers, most of whose data is idle on any given daynot MariaDB
- Very large corpora where holding every vector in memory is the dominant cost and occasional cold-query latency is acceptablenot MariaDB
- Hybrid retrieval combining BM25 and vector search where running and synchronising two separate systems is the problem being solvednot MariaDB
- Retrieval for agent and assistant products where indexes are created and destroyed frequently and per-index overhead must be near zeronot MariaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MariaDB
- JSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- Galera Cluster maximum performance limited to the slowest node in cluster
- InnoDB tables limited to 1,017 columns and 64 secondary indexes
- Transaction size limits in Galera (128K rows and 2GB by default)
- Less strict SQL type checking than PostgreSQL; allows implicit conversions
turbopuffer
- A cold namespace pays object storage latency on the first query, with a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents, so any interactive search box needs the data kept warm or the user waits about a second.
- Queries are eventually consistent by default, and after roughly 128 MiB of outstanding writes new data is invisible until indexed, which the vendor puts at tens of seconds for small namespaces and tens of minutes for large ones, so a bulk re-index is not immediately queryable.
- It is closed source with no community edition, so single-tenant or bring-your-own-cloud deployment is a commercial negotiation rather than a deployment choice, and there is no path to running it yourself if the relationship ends.
- Per-namespace ceilings, roughly 10,000 writes per second, 32 MB/s and 500 million documents per shard, mean a single enormous index has to be sharded across namespaces by your application rather than by the service.
- It is a search engine, not a database: there are no joins, no cross-document transactions and no SQL, so it sits beside a primary datastore and keeping the two in step is work that belongs to you.
Pricing, plan by plan
MariaDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MariaDB review.
turbopuffer
$16/month- Launch$16/month
- All database features
- Multi-tenancy deployment
- SOC2 & GDPR-ready DPA
- Scale$256/month
- Everything in Launch
- HIPAA-ready BAA
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
- Enterprise$4096/month
- Everything in Scale
- Single-tenancy & BYOC deployment options
- Private networking
Which should you pick?
Choose MariaDB if
- You need mysql compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- You also want aria storage engine.
Choose turbopuffer if
- You need object storage architecture.
- You also want namespaces.
Questions people ask
- Is MariaDB or turbopuffer better?
- Neither clearly leads. MariaDB starts at Free and turbopuffer at $16/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MariaDB or turbopuffer?
- MariaDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for MariaDB and $16/month for turbopuffer.
- Does MariaDB or turbopuffer run on more platforms?
- MariaDB runs on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS. turbopuffer runs on Web.
- Can I use MariaDB for free?
- Yes. MariaDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. turbopuffer starts at $16/month.
- What is MariaDB best used for?
- MariaDB is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what turbopuffer is typically brought in for.
- What can MariaDB do that turbopuffer cannot?
- MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility, Aria Storage Engine, ColumnStore, Galera Cluster. turbopuffer covers Object storage architecture, Namespaces, Vector search, Full-text search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MariaDB: Is MariaDB completely free and open source?
Yes. MariaDB Server is licensed under GPLv2 and guaranteed to remain perpetually free and open source, independent of any commercial entities.
Sourceturbopuffer: Can I self-host turbopuffer?
There is no open source or community edition. Single-tenant and bring-your-own-cloud deployments exist as commercial arrangements, but there is no way to run it independently of the vendor.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB backward compatible with MySQL?
Yes. MariaDB was designed as a drop-in replacement for MySQL. Every application, driver, and configuration that worked with MySQL works with MariaDB without code changes.
Sourceturbopuffer: How fast is it really?
Warm queries perform comparably to in-memory search engines. Cold queries, where data is not cached, have a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents. Write p90 is around 248 ms for a 512 KB upsert because writes go straight to object storage.
MariaDB: What are the storage engine options in MariaDB?
MariaDB supports multiple storage engines including InnoDB (transactional, default), Aria (crash-safe, good for read-heavy workloads), and MyISAM. The Aria engine is faster than InnoDB for certain read-heavy queries and full table scans.
Sourceturbopuffer: Is it consistent?
Eventually consistent by default, with the vendor reporting that over 99.8% of queries return consistent data. Strong consistency can be requested per query at a latency cost. Large write bursts have a longer visibility delay while indexing catches up.
MariaDB: How much does MariaDB cost?
MariaDB Community Server is completely free to download and use. MariaDB offers paid enterprise support and managed cloud services for organizations needing professional support.
Sourceturbopuffer: What is it best at?
Large numbers of namespaces where most are idle. The architecture makes cold data cheap to keep, which is exactly the shape of a multi-tenant product with a long tail of inactive customers.
MariaDB: Does MariaDB support native JSON storage?
MariaDB stores JSON using text fields (the JSON type is an alias for LONGTEXT), not as a native binary type like MySQL does. JSON support exists but is less sophisticated than MySQL's JSON functions and syntax.
Sourceturbopuffer: What are the hard limits?
Up to 128 billion documents and 256 TB per namespace, 500 million documents per shard, 64 MiB per document, 10,752 dense vector dimensions, roughly 10,000 writes per second per namespace and a maximum result set of 10,000.
MariaDB: What scaling options does MariaDB provide?
MariaDB supports both scaling up (more cores, memory, storage) and scaling out (read replication, Galera Cluster with multi-node replication). However, Galera Cluster performance cannot exceed the slowest node in the cluster.
SourceRelated pages
More on turbopuffer
Other head to heads
- MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
- MariaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- MariaDB vs Oracle Database
- MariaDB vs SQLite
- MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- MariaDB vs IBM Db2
- MariaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- MariaDB vs Presto
- MariaDB vs Aiven
- MariaDB vs OpenSearch
- MariaDB vs TiDB
- MariaDB vs Firestore
- MariaDB vs Memcached
- MariaDB vs MotherDuck
- MariaDB vs Neo4j
- MariaDB vs Qdrant
- MariaDB vs Valkey
- MariaDB vs Airtable
- MariaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- MariaDB vs Chroma
- MariaDB vs BigQuery
- MariaDB vs Dremio
- MariaDB vs DuckDB
- MariaDB vs Typesense
- MariaDB vs Dragonfly
- MariaDB vs LanceDB
- MariaDB vs Readyset
- MariaDB vs Apache Doris
- MariaDB vs ArangoDB
- MariaDB vs Canary Labs
- MariaDB vs Apache Solr
- turbopuffer vs PostgreSQL
- turbopuffer vs Microsoft SQL Server
- turbopuffer vs Oracle Database
- turbopuffer vs SQLite
- turbopuffer vs Amazon Aurora
- turbopuffer vs IBM Db2
- turbopuffer vs Google Cloud SQL
- turbopuffer vs Presto
- turbopuffer vs Aiven
- turbopuffer vs OpenSearch
- turbopuffer vs TiDB
- turbopuffer vs Firestore
- turbopuffer vs Memcached
- turbopuffer vs MotherDuck
- turbopuffer vs Neo4j
- turbopuffer vs Qdrant
- turbopuffer vs Valkey
- turbopuffer vs Airtable
- turbopuffer vs Cockroach Labs
- turbopuffer vs Chroma
- turbopuffer vs BigQuery
- turbopuffer vs Dremio
- turbopuffer vs DuckDB
- turbopuffer vs Typesense
- turbopuffer vs Dragonfly
- turbopuffer vs LanceDB
- turbopuffer vs Readyset
- turbopuffer vs Apache Doris
- turbopuffer vs ArangoDB
- turbopuffer vs Canary Labs
- turbopuffer vs Apache Solr
