CAD · head to head
Altium 365 vs CoreTechnologie

Altium 365
CAD
Cloud workspace for Altium Designer PCB projects, now inside Renesas
- From
- $1990/year
- Rated
- -

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Altium 365 the 1,990 US dollar Altium Develop entry price is capped at five authors in total, so a growing team hits a forced migration to Agile Teams with unpublished pricing exactly when headcount is rising.; CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- They diverge on capability: Altium 365 covers Shared workspace, CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Altium 365 and CoreTechnologie actually diverge.
| Attribute | Altium 365 | CoreTechnologie |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1990/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Cloud, On-premise | Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Altium 365
- Shared workspace
- Managed components
- Browser review
- Unlimited workspace users
- MCAD CoDesigner
- Manufacturing portal
- Requirements Portal
- BOM Portal
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Altium 365
- A hardware startup where two engineers draw boards but eight people need to review them, avoiding eight CAD seatsnot CoreTechnologie
- A team handing fabrication and assembly data to a contract manufacturer as a versioned release rather than a zip of Gerbersnot CoreTechnologie
- A company running board and enclosure design in parallel and needing bidirectional geometry exchange with mechanical CADnot CoreTechnologie
- A buyer checking component lifecycle and availability against the live BOM before a design is frozennot CoreTechnologie
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot Altium 365
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot Altium 365
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot Altium 365
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot Altium 365
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Altium 365
- The 1,990 US dollar Altium Develop entry price is capped at five authors in total, so a growing team hits a forced migration to Agile Teams with unpublished pricing exactly when headcount is rising.
- Add-on portals are expensive per seat; BOM Portal has been quoted at around 1,999 US dollars per user per year and MCAD CoDesigner at around 499, so the real cost of a working configuration is well above the headline.
- It is tied to Altium Designer; there is no meaningful use of the platform for teams designing in KiCad, OrCAD or Allegro, which makes it a lock-in decision rather than a tooling one.
- Renesas acquired Altium in 2024, and a semiconductor manufacturer owning the design tool used to select competing semiconductors is a conflict some buyers will want addressed in writing before uploading a library.
- Repeated repackaging, from Altium 365 Standard and Pro tiers to Altium Develop and Agile Teams, has made renewal comparisons difficult and customers have found their previous tier no longer maps to anything on the price list.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
Pricing, plan by plan
Altium 365
$1990/year- Altium Develop$1990/year
- One Altium Designer author licence
- One workspace for shared projects and libraries
- Unlimited workspace users for review, comment, tasks and BOM access
- Altium Agile Teams$undefined/year
- For teams beyond five ECAD authors
- Extended workspace governance and administration
- Quoted, no published price
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- On-premise or private cloud workspace server
- Formal ECO and lifecycle governance
- Quoted, no published price
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
Which should you pick?
Choose Altium 365 if
- You need shared workspace.
- You work on Web, Windows, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want managed components.
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Questions people ask
- Is Altium 365 or CoreTechnologie better?
- Neither clearly leads. Altium 365 starts at $1990/year and CoreTechnologie at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Altium 365 or CoreTechnologie?
- Altium 365 starts at $1990/year and CoreTechnologie at On request.
- Does Altium 365 or CoreTechnologie run on more platforms?
- Altium 365 runs on Web, Windows, Cloud, On-premise. CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is Altium 365 best used for?
- Altium 365 is most often used for a hardware startup where two engineers draw boards but eight people need to review them, avoiding eight cad seats, a team handing fabrication and assembly data to a contract manufacturer as a versioned release rather than a zip of gerbers, a company running board and enclosure design in parallel and needing bidirectional geometry exchange with mechanical cad, a buyer checking component lifecycle and availability against the live bom before a design is frozen. Of those, a hardware startup where two engineers draw boards but eight people need to review them, avoiding eight cad seats and a team handing fabrication and assembly data to a contract manufacturer as a versioned release rather than a zip of gerbers are not what CoreTechnologie is typically brought in for.
- What can Altium 365 do that CoreTechnologie cannot?
- Altium 365 covers Shared workspace, Managed components, Browser review, Unlimited workspace users. CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Altium 365: Is Altium 365 free with Altium Designer?
A workspace is included with a current subscription, but the higher tiers, extra authors and the add-on portals are chargeable. The unlimited non-author users are genuinely included.
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
Altium 365: What does it cost?
Altium Develop starts at about 1,990 US dollars a year for one author plus a workspace, with extra authors at 995 US dollars each up to four more. Larger teams are quoted.
CoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
Altium 365: Who owns Altium now?
Renesas Electronics completed its acquisition of Altium in 2024. Altium 365 is therefore a Renesas-owned platform.
CoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
Altium 365: Can I keep design data on my own servers?
Yes, through the Enterprise on-premise workspace server, but that is a quoted product and most of the newer portal features assume the hosted platform.
CoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
Related pages
More on CoreTechnologie
Other head to heads
- Altium 365 vs OnShape
- Altium 365 vs FreeCAD
- Altium 365 vs KiCad
- Altium 365 vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Altium 365 vs Solid Edge
- Altium 365 vs Substance 3D Designer
- Altium 365 vs Tinkercad
- Altium 365 vs PrusaSlicer
- Altium 365 vs Alibre Design
- Altium 365 vs BricsCAD
- Altium 365 vs nTop
- Altium 365 vs 3D-Coat
- Altium 365 vs Bambu Studio
- Altium 365 vs CloudCompare
- Altium 365 vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Altium 365 vs Siemens NX
- Altium 365 vs CATIA
- Altium 365 vs ANSYS Fluent
- Altium 365 vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Altium 365 vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Altium 365 vs Bentley MicroStation
- Altium 365 vs Arnold
- Altium 365 vs Carlson Software
- Altium 365 vs Corona Renderer
- Altium 365 vs Inventor
- Altium 365 vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs OnShape
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs KiCad
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs Solid Edge
- CoreTechnologie vs Substance 3D Designer
- CoreTechnologie vs Tinkercad
- CoreTechnologie vs PrusaSlicer
- CoreTechnologie vs Alibre Design
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs 3D-Coat
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs CloudCompare
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
