Mining · head to head
CorePlan vs Geoscience ANALYST

CorePlan
Mining
Drilling programme management for mineral exploration teams and drilling contractors
- From
- $1350/month
- Rated
- -

Geoscience ANALYST
Mining
Advanced geoscience data analysis and visualization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CorePlan pricing is usage based on plods or shifts and billed annually with overage calculated monthly, so an intense drilling quarter generates an unbudgeted overage invoice, and finance teams that need a fixed annual number will struggle to get one.; Geoscience ANALYST the free edition is a 3D viewer only; creating, editing, processing and interpreting objects requires a paid Pro licence
- They diverge on capability: CorePlan covers Digital plods, Geoscience ANALYST covers 3D visualization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CorePlan and Geoscience ANALYST actually diverge.
| Attribute | CorePlan | Geoscience ANALYST |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1350/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by shift or plod volume | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, Linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 1981 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CorePlan
- Digital plods
- Rig scheduling
- Contractor reconciliation
- Sample and core tracking
- Field Operations module
- Advanced Analytics
- Forms subscription
- Interoperability service
Only in Geoscience ANALYST
- 3D visualization
- Geophysical interpretation
- Geological modeling
- Data management
- Advanced analysis
- Montaj
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CorePlan
- A junior explorer running a two rig programme that wants cost per metre visible weekly instead of when the contractor invoice arrivesnot Geoscience ANALYST
- A drilling contractor with crews across several client sites submitting plods digitally to cut invoice disputesnot Geoscience ANALYST
- An exploration manager reconciling contractor billing against recorded shift hours before approving paymentnot Geoscience ANALYST
- A multi project mid tier miner consolidating hole planning and sample dispatch across sites that currently each run their own spreadsheetnot Geoscience ANALYST
Geoscience ANALYST
- Visualising and sharing integrated 3D geoscience and mining datanot CorePlan
- Geologically constrained geophysical modelling and inversionnot CorePlan
- Exploration targeting from combined drillhole, geophysics and geology datanot CorePlan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CorePlan
- Pricing is usage based on plods or shifts and billed annually with overage calculated monthly, so an intense drilling quarter generates an unbudgeted overage invoice, and finance teams that need a fixed annual number will struggle to get one.
- Only the Starter tier price is published; Professional, Enterprise and Corporate are all quote only, so comparing CorePlan against a competitor requires entering a sales process before you know the number.
- Core modules are unbundled: field operations, advanced analytics and custom forms are separately priced add-ons that each start in the hundreds of dollars per month, so the realistic monthly cost is well above the advertised entry price.
- It is a drilling operations system, not a geological database or modelling package, so it must sit alongside acQuire, Datashed or equivalent and the integration between them is a project rather than a switch.
- The customer base and support depth are concentrated in Australia and the company is small and venture funded, which means teams in the Americas or Africa get thinner local implementation support and carry the usual supplier concentration risk on a system that sits in the middle of drilling spend.
Geoscience ANALYST
- The free edition is a 3D viewer only; creating, editing, processing and interpreting objects requires a paid Pro licence
- Capability is divided across four separate paid tiers, Pro, Pro Geophysics, Pro Geology and Pro HPC, so geophysical inversion and AI geological interpretation are separate purchases
- No price is published for any Pro tier; the vendor must be contacted for cost and licensing
Pricing, plan by plan
CorePlan
$1350/month- Starter$1350/month
- One project
- Up to two rigs
- Digital plods and rig scheduling
- Professional$undefined/month
- Multi-project management for mid-tier explorers
- Higher rig and shift allowances
- Priced on quotation
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Large-scale operations
- Complex data integration
- Priced on quotation
- Field Operations add-on$800/month
- Pre-starts and inspections
- Field compliance forms
- From this price
Geoscience ANALYST
On request- ANALYST Professional$13000/year
- Data visualization
- 3D modeling
- Analysis tools
Which should you pick?
Choose CorePlan if
- You need digital plods.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want rig scheduling.
Choose Geoscience ANALYST if
- You need 3d visualization.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want geophysical interpretation.
Questions people ask
- Is CorePlan or Geoscience ANALYST better?
- Neither clearly leads. CorePlan starts at $1350/month and Geoscience ANALYST at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CorePlan or Geoscience ANALYST?
- CorePlan starts at $1350/month and Geoscience ANALYST at On request.
- Does CorePlan or Geoscience ANALYST run on more platforms?
- CorePlan runs on Web, iOS, Android. Geoscience ANALYST runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is CorePlan best used for?
- CorePlan is most often used for a junior explorer running a two rig programme that wants cost per metre visible weekly instead of when the contractor invoice arrives, a drilling contractor with crews across several client sites submitting plods digitally to cut invoice disputes, an exploration manager reconciling contractor billing against recorded shift hours before approving payment, a multi project mid tier miner consolidating hole planning and sample dispatch across sites that currently each run their own spreadsheet. Of those, a junior explorer running a two rig programme that wants cost per metre visible weekly instead of when the contractor invoice arrives and a drilling contractor with crews across several client sites submitting plods digitally to cut invoice disputes are not what Geoscience ANALYST is typically brought in for.
- What can CorePlan do that Geoscience ANALYST cannot?
- CorePlan covers Digital plods, Rig scheduling, Contractor reconciliation, Sample and core tracking. Geoscience ANALYST covers 3D visualization, Geophysical interpretation, Geological modeling, Data management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CorePlan: Is CorePlan a geological database?
No. It manages drilling operations, plods, scheduling and sample dispatch. Geological data still lives in acQuire, Datashed or similar.
CorePlan: Can drilling contractors use it too?
Yes, and that is the point. Contractors submit plods on the same platform their client uses, which removes the invoice reconciliation argument.
CorePlan: What does it actually cost?
Starter is 1,350 US dollars a month for one project and two rigs, billed annually. Everything above that is quoted, and the analytics and field modules add several hundred dollars a month each.
CorePlan: Does it work without mobile signal?
Yes, field capture works offline and syncs when the rig comes back into coverage.
Related pages
More on Geoscience ANALYST
Other head to heads
- CorePlan vs Micromine
- CorePlan vs Imago
- CorePlan vs Deswik Suite
- CorePlan vs Wenco
- CorePlan vs Leapfrog Geo
- CorePlan vs Surpac
- CorePlan vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- CorePlan vs Promine
- CorePlan vs acQuire GIM Suite
- CorePlan vs Caterpillar MineStar
- CorePlan vs Minemax
- CorePlan vs OptiMine
- CorePlan vs Vulcan
- CorePlan vs 3DEC
- CorePlan vs Seequent Central
- CorePlan vs Fusion Mining
- CorePlan vs IHS Markit Petra
- CorePlan vs Cority EHS
- CorePlan vs Enablon EHS
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Micromine
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Imago
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Deswik Suite
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Wenco
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Leapfrog Geo
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Surpac
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Promine
- Geoscience ANALYST vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Minemax
- Geoscience ANALYST vs OptiMine
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Vulcan
- Geoscience ANALYST vs 3DEC
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Seequent Central
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Fusion Mining
- Geoscience ANALYST vs IHS Markit Petra
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Cority EHS
- Geoscience ANALYST vs Enablon EHS
