Software · head to head
FLAC3D vs PCBC
F
FLAC3D
Software
3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store; PCBC dassault Systemes GEOVIA PCBC has no published commercial pricing and is sold via direct contact, with a separate Academic License Program as the only named alternative tier
- They diverge on capability: FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, PCBC covers Pit optimization.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FLAC3D and PCBC actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (1981).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FLAC3D
- 3D finite difference modeling
- Stress-strain analysis
- Dynamic analysis
- Coupled flow analysis
- Mining-specific features
- GeoStudio
- AutoCAD
- Leapfrog
Only in PCBC
- Pit optimization
- Pushback scheduling
- Cutoff grade analysis
- NPV maximization
- Sensitivity analysis
- Surpac
- Whittle
- MineSched
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FLAC3D
- Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot PCBC
- Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot PCBC
- Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot PCBC
PCBC
- Pit optimizationnot FLAC3D
- Pushback designnot FLAC3D
- Cutoff optimizationnot FLAC3D
- Economic analysisnot FLAC3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FLAC3D
- The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
- Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
- One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer
PCBC
- Dassault Systemes GEOVIA PCBC has no published commercial pricing and is sold via direct contact, with a separate Academic License Program as the only named alternative tier
Pricing, plan by plan
FLAC3D
On request- FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
- 3D finite difference analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
PCBC
On request- PCBC Standard$12000/year
- Pit optimization
- Pushback design
- Economic analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose FLAC3D if
- You need 3d finite difference modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want stress-strain analysis.
Choose PCBC if
- You need pit optimization.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want pushback scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is FLAC3D or PCBC better?
- Neither clearly leads. FLAC3D starts at On request and PCBC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FLAC3D or PCBC?
- FLAC3D starts at On request and PCBC at On request.
- Does FLAC3D or PCBC run on more platforms?
- FLAC3D runs on Windows, Linux. PCBC runs on Windows.
- What is FLAC3D best used for?
- FLAC3D is most often used for three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour, analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving, coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structures. Of those, three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour and analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving are not what PCBC is typically brought in for.
- What can FLAC3D do that PCBC cannot?
- FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Dynamic analysis, Coupled flow analysis. PCBC covers Pit optimization, Pushback scheduling, Cutoff grade analysis, NPV maximization. Both handle Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- FLAC3D vs Caterpillar MineStar
- FLAC3D vs Leapfrog Geo
- FLAC3D vs Deswik Suite
- FLAC3D vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- FLAC3D vs Datamine
- FLAC3D vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- FLAC3D vs Micromine
- FLAC3D vs Datamine Studio RM
- FLAC3D vs Maptek I-Site
- FLAC3D vs Minemax
- FLAC3D vs Promine
- FLAC3D vs Surpac
- FLAC3D vs Trimble Mining
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan
- FLAC3D vs 3DEC
- FLAC3D vs acQuire GIM Suite
- FLAC3D vs Carlson Mining
- FLAC3D vs Cority EHS
- PCBC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- PCBC vs Leapfrog Geo
- PCBC vs Deswik Suite
- PCBC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- PCBC vs Datamine
- PCBC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- PCBC vs Micromine
- PCBC vs Datamine Studio RM
- PCBC vs Maptek I-Site
- PCBC vs Minemax
- PCBC vs Promine
- PCBC vs Surpac
- PCBC vs Trimble Mining
- PCBC vs Vulcan
- PCBC vs 3DEC
- PCBC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- PCBC vs Carlson Mining
- PCBC vs Cority EHS

