APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Semgrep

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Semgrep
Cybersecurity
Open-source static analysis tool for finding security bugs and enforcing code standards.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Semgrep free tier caps out at 10 contributors and 10 repositories.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Semgrep covers Static code scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Semgrep actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Semgrep
- Static code scanning
- Supply chain scanning
- Secrets detection
- Cross-file analysis
- AI-powered triage and remediation
- CI/CD integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Semgrep
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Semgrep
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Semgrep
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Semgrep
Semgrep
- Scanning code for security vulnerabilities in CI/CDnot Convoy
- Detecting vulnerable open-source dependenciesnot Convoy
- Finding hardcoded secrets before code shipsnot Convoy
- Enforcing custom code standards with rule setsnot Convoy
- Prioritizing findings with AI-assisted triagenot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Semgrep
- Free tier caps out at 10 contributors and 10 repositories.
- Secrets scanning is priced as a separate module ($15/contributor) from Code and Supply Chain.
- Self-managed repositories and custom CI/CD require the Enterprise tier.
- AI credits are limited per tier and additional usage requires upgrading.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Semgrep
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10 contributors
- Code and Supply Chain scanning
- 60 AI credits total
- Teams$30/month
- Code, Supply Chain, or Secrets scanning per contributor
- Pro rules
- AI-powered triage and remediation
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- On-prem support
- Custom CI/CD
- 50 AI credits per developer/month
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Semgrep if
- You need static code scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, mac, windows.
- You also want supply chain scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Semgrep better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Semgrep at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Semgrep?
- Convoy starts at Free and Semgrep at Free.
- Does Convoy or Semgrep run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Semgrep runs on web, api, linux, mac, windows.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Semgrep is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Semgrep cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Semgrep covers Static code scanning, Supply chain scanning, Secrets detection, Cross-file analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Semgrep: What does Semgrep cost?
The Free edition covers up to 10 contributors; Teams starts at $30/contributor/month for Code scanning (Supply Chain also $30, Secrets $15); Enterprise is custom-priced.
SourceConvoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Semgrep: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free edition supports up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories with Code and Supply Chain scanning plus 60 AI credits total.
SourceConvoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Semgrep: How is usage metered?
Pricing is per contributor, defined as someone who made at least one commit to a scanned private repository in the past 90 days.
SourceConvoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Semgrep: Is there special pricing for startups?
Yes, Semgrep offers special startup pricing upon request for early-stage companies.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Veracode
- Convoy vs Arnica
- Convoy vs Trivy
- Convoy vs Grype
- Convoy vs Snyk
- Convoy vs Bitwarden
- Convoy vs Infisical
- Convoy vs Chainguard
- Convoy vs Authelia
- Convoy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Convoy vs Ory Kratos
- Convoy vs authentik
- Convoy vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Convoy vs Shufti Pro
- Convoy vs Signicat
- Convoy vs Silent Eight
- Convoy vs Socket
- Convoy vs Socure
- Semgrep vs Kong
- Semgrep vs Svix
- Semgrep vs Tyk
- Semgrep vs Janus Gateway
- Semgrep vs Appwrite
- Semgrep vs Gravitee
- Semgrep vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Semgrep vs Formance
- Semgrep vs AWS API Gateway
- Semgrep vs Hasura
- Semgrep vs PocketBase
- Semgrep vs Sensedia
- Semgrep vs Sila
- Semgrep vs Swagger
- Semgrep vs TIBCO Mashery
- Semgrep vs Zeplo
- Semgrep vs Kong Gateway
- Semgrep vs Veracode
- Semgrep vs Arnica
- Semgrep vs Trivy
- Semgrep vs Grype
- Semgrep vs Snyk
- Semgrep vs Bitwarden
- Semgrep vs Infisical
- Semgrep vs Chainguard
- Semgrep vs Authelia
- Semgrep vs HashiCorp Vault
- Semgrep vs Ory Kratos
- Semgrep vs authentik
- Semgrep vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Semgrep vs Shufti Pro
- Semgrep vs Signicat
- Semgrep vs Silent Eight
- Semgrep vs Socket
- Semgrep vs Socure
