APIs · head to head
Convoy vs SeaTable

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SeaTable
Spreadsheets
German-hosted database-spreadsheet hybrid from the team behind Seafile, with a self-hosted server edition
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; SeaTable the free self-hosted Developer Edition is capped at three users, so the pattern that makes Baserow and NocoDB attractive, running it yourself for free at real headcount, is not available and any serious on-premises deployment needs a paid per-user licence.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, SeaTable covers Typed column database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and SeaTable actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in SeaTable
- Typed column database
- Multiple views
- Universal app builder
- Python and JavaScript scripting
- Self-hosted server
- German data centres
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot SeaTable
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot SeaTable
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot SeaTable
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot SeaTable
SeaTable
- A German or Austrian company that needs a shared operational database but cannot put customer records on a US-hosted servicenot Convoy
- Replacing a sprawl of Excel files used by several departments with one permissioned base and per-view sharingnot Convoy
- Running a small internal tool, such as an equipment register or an application tracker, without commissioning a bespoke buildnot Convoy
- Teams already using Seafile that want structured data alongside their file sync platformnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
SeaTable
- The free self-hosted Developer Edition is capped at three users, so the pattern that makes Baserow and NocoDB attractive, running it yourself for free at real headcount, is not available and any serious on-premises deployment needs a paid per-user licence.
- Row limits are counted across the whole account rather than per base, so the free plan ceiling of 10,000 rows and the Plus ceiling of 50,000 rows arrive sooner than people expect once a few tables hold historical records.
- The integration catalogue is short compared with Airtable, and many connections have to be routed through Zapier, Make or n8n, which adds a second subscription and a second failure point.
- English documentation and community content lag the German material, so non-German teams hit thinner tutorials and fewer worked examples when they get to scripting and the app builder.
- The vendor is a small German company rather than a venture-funded platform, which is a stability advantage but means a slower feature pace and fewer third-party consultants available to hire if a project needs outside help.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
SeaTable
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25 users
- 10,000 rows in total
- 2 GB storage
- Plus$7/month
- Billed annually, 9 EUR if billed monthly
- 50,000 rows
- 50 GB storage
- Enterprise$14/month
- Billed annually, 18 EUR if billed monthly
- Unlimited rows
- 100 GB storage
- Dedicated Cloud$undefined/year
- Quoted, minimum 100 users
- Dedicated instance
- Unlimited rows
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose SeaTable if
- You need typed column database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want multiple views.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or SeaTable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and SeaTable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or SeaTable?
- Convoy starts at Free and SeaTable at Free.
- Does Convoy or SeaTable run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. SeaTable runs on Web, iOS, Android, Linux.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what SeaTable is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that SeaTable cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. SeaTable covers Typed column database, Multiple views, Universal app builder, Python and JavaScript scripting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
SeaTable: Where is SeaTable cloud data actually stored?
In data centres in Germany, under German and EU law, with a standard GDPR processing agreement available.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
SeaTable: Is SeaTable open source?
No. Seafile, from the same team, is open source. SeaTable is a commercial product with a free self-hosted edition limited to three users.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
SeaTable: How does it compare with Airtable on price?
Plus is 7 EUR per user per month billed annually against Airtable Team at 20 USD, but SeaTable applies hard row ceilings on every plan below Enterprise.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
SeaTable: Can I move an existing Airtable base across?
Yes, SeaTable imports Airtable bases and Excel files, though formula fields and automations usually need rebuilding by hand.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Baserow
- Convoy vs NocoDB
- Convoy vs APITable
- Convoy vs Mathesar
- Convoy vs Teable
- Convoy vs Sigma Computing
- Convoy vs Fibery
- Convoy vs Budibase
- Convoy vs Google Sheets
- Convoy vs Equals
- Convoy vs Cube Software
- Convoy vs Tableau
- Convoy vs Rowy
- Convoy vs Coefficient
- SeaTable vs Kong
- SeaTable vs Svix
- SeaTable vs Tyk
- SeaTable vs Janus Gateway
- SeaTable vs Appwrite
- SeaTable vs Gravitee
- SeaTable vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- SeaTable vs Formance
- SeaTable vs AWS API Gateway
- SeaTable vs Hasura
- SeaTable vs PocketBase
- SeaTable vs Sensedia
- SeaTable vs Sila
- SeaTable vs Swagger
- SeaTable vs TIBCO Mashery
- SeaTable vs Zeplo
- SeaTable vs Kong Gateway
- SeaTable vs Baserow
- SeaTable vs NocoDB
- SeaTable vs APITable
- SeaTable vs Mathesar
- SeaTable vs Teable
- SeaTable vs Sigma Computing
- SeaTable vs Fibery
- SeaTable vs Budibase
- SeaTable vs Google Sheets
- SeaTable vs Equals
- SeaTable vs Cube Software
- SeaTable vs Tableau
- SeaTable vs Rowy
- SeaTable vs Coefficient
