APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Pulumi

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Pulumi
Cloud
Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Pulumi the free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Pulumi covers Multi-language support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Pulumi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Pulumi
- Multi-language support
- Multi-cloud
- State management
- Secrets management
- RBAC
- Stacks
- Automation API
- Policy as Code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Pulumi
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Pulumi
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Pulumi
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Pulumi
Pulumi
- Infrastructure as codenot Convoy
- Cloud resource provisioningnot Convoy
- DevOps automationnot Convoy
- Multi-cloud managementnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Pulumi
- The free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- The Team plan is $40 per month base including 40 credits, and caps the organisation at 10 users
- SAML/SSO, RBAC, audit logs and drift detection require the Enterprise plan at $400 per month base
- The per-resource rate rises from $0.1825 per resource per month on Team to $0.365 on Enterprise, so upgrading raises the unit price as well as the base fee
- Managed secrets are billed separately at $0.50 per secret per month on Team and $0.75 on Enterprise
- Self-hosting, SCIM user sync, audit log export and 24x7 support are only in Business Critical, which is custom priced with no published rate
- Team includes up to 500 resources and Enterprise up to 2,000, with everything beyond billed on demand as credits
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Pulumi
Free- IndividualFree
- 1 user
- Unlimited projects/stacks
- 500 workflow minutes monthly
- Team$40/month
- Up to 10 users
- Secure collaboration
- CI/CD integration
- Enterprise$400/month
- Unlimited users
- SAML/SSO
- RBAC
- Business Critical$null/custom
- Self-hosting
- Advanced compliance
- SCIM integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Pulumi if
- You need multi-language support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want multi-cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Pulumi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Pulumi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Pulumi?
- Convoy starts at Free and Pulumi at Free.
- Does Convoy or Pulumi run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Pulumi runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Pulumi is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Pulumi cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Multi-cloud, State management, Secrets management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Pulumi: How much does Pulumi cost?
Pulumi offers a free Individual tier forever, Team plan at $40/month with 40 credits, and Enterprise at $400/month with 400 credits. Credit usage varies by resource type and workflow needs.
SourceConvoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Pulumi: What is included in the Pulumi free tier?
The free Individual tier includes 1 user, unlimited projects/stacks, 500 workflow minutes monthly, and 5 million Neo tokens free.
SourceConvoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Pulumi: How are Pulumi credits charged?
1 Pulumi Credit equals $1 USD. Credits are drawn from a shared pool. IaC resources cost $0.1825/month per resource on Team and $0.365 on Enterprise; ESC secrets cost $0.50-$0.75/month; workflow minutes cost $0.01 each.
SourceConvoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Pulumi: Does Pulumi offer volume discounts?
Yes, the Enterprise tier ($400/month) includes volume discounts and is designed for approximately 2,000 IaC resources.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs SST
- Convoy vs Terragrunt
- Convoy vs Serverless Framework
- Convoy vs Nitric
- Convoy vs Encore
- Convoy vs Neon
- Convoy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Convoy vs DigitalOcean
- Convoy vs Grafana Cloud
- Convoy vs Crossplane
- Convoy vs Rancher
- Convoy vs Packer
- Convoy vs Oracle Cloud
- Convoy vs Orca Security
- Convoy vs Porter
- Convoy vs Rook
- Pulumi vs Kong
- Pulumi vs Svix
- Pulumi vs Tyk
- Pulumi vs Janus Gateway
- Pulumi vs Appwrite
- Pulumi vs Gravitee
- Pulumi vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Pulumi vs Formance
- Pulumi vs AWS API Gateway
- Pulumi vs Hasura
- Pulumi vs PocketBase
- Pulumi vs Sensedia
- Pulumi vs Sila
- Pulumi vs Swagger
- Pulumi vs TIBCO Mashery
- Pulumi vs Zeplo
- Pulumi vs Kong Gateway
- Pulumi vs SST
- Pulumi vs Terragrunt
- Pulumi vs Serverless Framework
- Pulumi vs Nitric
- Pulumi vs Encore
- Pulumi vs Neon
- Pulumi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Pulumi vs DigitalOcean
- Pulumi vs Grafana Cloud
- Pulumi vs Crossplane
- Pulumi vs Rancher
- Pulumi vs Packer
- Pulumi vs Oracle Cloud
- Pulumi vs Orca Security
- Pulumi vs Porter
- Pulumi vs Rook
