APIs · head to head
Convoy vs .NET MAUI

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

.NET MAUI
Mobile Development
Microsoft-maintained, free framework for native iOS, Android, Windows and macOS apps from one C# codebase
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; .NET MAUI its release and support lifecycle is tied to the underlying .NET version, so a team on an odd-numbered .NET release faces a support cutoff roughly every eighteen months and must budget upgrade work accordingly.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, .NET MAUI covers Single C# and XAML codebase.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and .NET MAUI actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in .NET MAUI
- Single C# and XAML codebase
- Native UI rendering
- Xamarin migration path
- Hot Reload
- Blazor Hybrid support
- MVU and data binding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot .NET MAUI
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot .NET MAUI
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot .NET MAUI
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot .NET MAUI
.NET MAUI
- A .NET shop extending an existing C# codebase or business logic layer into iOS and Androidnot Convoy
- A team migrating a retired Xamarin.Forms app, since Microsoft provides an official upgrade pathnot Convoy
- An organisation that wants one codebase spanning mobile and Windows desktop without a second languagenot Convoy
- A company standardised on Visual Studio and Azure DevOps wanting mobile builds in the same pipelinenot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
.NET MAUI
- Its release and support lifecycle is tied to the underlying .NET version, so a team on an odd-numbered .NET release faces a support cutoff roughly every eighteen months and must budget upgrade work accordingly.
- Platform-specific control styling and native look-and-feel have historically needed more manual work and workaround packages than Flutter delivers out of the box.
- macOS and desktop support are less mature than the iOS and Android targets, so teams wanting a strong Mac app experience often still reach for native AppKit or a dedicated tool.
- The talent pool of mobile developers fluent in MAUI specifically is smaller than for Flutter or React Native, even though C# itself is common.
- Third-party control libraries such as Syncfusion and Telerik fill real gaps in the built-in component set, meaning a serious app often carries an additional commercial licence cost despite the framework itself being free.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
.NET MAUI
Free- .NET MAUIFree
- MIT licensed, unlimited apps
- Bundled with the free .NET SDK
- Visual Studio Community edition available at no cost for individuals and small teams
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose .NET MAUI if
- You need single c# and xaml codebase.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want native ui rendering.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or .NET MAUI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and .NET MAUI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or .NET MAUI?
- Convoy starts at Free and .NET MAUI at Free.
- Does Convoy or .NET MAUI run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. .NET MAUI runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what .NET MAUI is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that .NET MAUI cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. .NET MAUI covers Single C# and XAML codebase, Native UI rendering, Xamarin migration path, Hot Reload.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
.NET MAUI: Is .NET MAUI really free for commercial apps?
Yes. It ships under the MIT licence as part of the free .NET SDK, with no separate mobile licence fee from Microsoft.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
.NET MAUI: Is this the same as Xamarin?
It is the successor. Xamarin.Forms was retired in 2024 and Microsoft provides migration tooling from it to MAUI.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
.NET MAUI: How long is each .NET version supported?
Even-numbered releases get Long Term Support (around three years); odd-numbered releases get roughly eighteen months, and MAUI follows that same .NET release cadence.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Pusher
- Convoy vs Salt Edge
- Convoy vs Skyflow
- Convoy vs Yodlee
- Convoy vs Backbase
- Convoy vs Enfuce
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Flutter
- Convoy vs React Native
- Convoy vs Kotlin Multiplatform
- Convoy vs EAS Build
- Convoy vs NativeScript
- Convoy vs Xcode
- Convoy vs Capacitor
- Convoy vs RevenueCat
- Convoy vs AppsFlyer
- Convoy vs Emerge Tools
- Convoy vs Maestro
- Convoy vs Sencha
- Convoy vs Luciq
- Convoy vs Superwall
- .NET MAUI vs Kong
- .NET MAUI vs Svix
- .NET MAUI vs Tyk
- .NET MAUI vs Janus Gateway
- .NET MAUI vs Appwrite
- .NET MAUI vs Gravitee
- .NET MAUI vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- .NET MAUI vs Formance
- .NET MAUI vs AWS API Gateway
- .NET MAUI vs Hasura
- .NET MAUI vs PocketBase
- .NET MAUI vs Pusher
- .NET MAUI vs Salt Edge
- .NET MAUI vs Skyflow
- .NET MAUI vs Yodlee
- .NET MAUI vs Backbase
- .NET MAUI vs Enfuce
- .NET MAUI vs Kong Gateway
- .NET MAUI vs Flutter
- .NET MAUI vs React Native
- .NET MAUI vs Kotlin Multiplatform
- .NET MAUI vs EAS Build
- .NET MAUI vs NativeScript
- .NET MAUI vs Xcode
- .NET MAUI vs Capacitor
- .NET MAUI vs RevenueCat
- .NET MAUI vs AppsFlyer
- .NET MAUI vs Emerge Tools
- .NET MAUI vs Maestro
- .NET MAUI vs Sencha
- .NET MAUI vs Luciq
- .NET MAUI vs Superwall
