APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Docsify

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Docsify
Documentation
Documentation site generator that renders markdown in the browser with no build step and no generated HTML
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Docsify pages are assembled by JavaScript at runtime, so search engines and crawlers that do not execute scripts see an empty shell, which makes it unsuitable for documentation that must be found through search.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Docsify covers No build step.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Docsify actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Docsify
- No build step
- Single HTML entry point
- Client-side full-text search
- Plugin ecosystem
- Themeable
- docsify-cli
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Docsify
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Docsify
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Docsify
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Docsify
Docsify
- Turning a repository docs folder into a browsable site with no pipeline to maintainnot Convoy
- Internal documentation behind authentication where search engine indexing is irrelevantnot Convoy
- Small open-source projects that want more than a README and less than a static site generatornot Convoy
- Prototyping documentation structure before committing to a heavier toolchainnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Docsify
- Pages are assembled by JavaScript at runtime, so search engines and crawlers that do not execute scripts see an empty shell, which makes it unsuitable for documentation that must be found through search.
- Every page view fetches markdown files over the network and renders them client-side, so on slow connections the site is visibly slower than pre-generated HTML.
- Full-text search is built in the browser from all your documents, and the index becomes slow to build and heavy to hold once a site grows past a few dozen pages.
- There is no built-in versioning, so supporting several releases of a product means directory conventions and hand-maintained sidebars.
- The plugin ecosystem is loaded through script tags with no dependency management, so plugins break silently against new core versions and there is no build to catch it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Docsify
Free- DocsifyFree
- MIT licensed
- No build infrastructure required
- All plugins and themes free
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Docsify if
- You need no build step.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, GitHub Pages, Netlify, Vercel.
- You also want single html entry point.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Docsify better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Docsify at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Docsify?
- Convoy starts at Free and Docsify at Free.
- Does Convoy or Docsify run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Docsify runs on Web, Self-hosted, GitHub Pages, Netlify, Vercel.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Docsify is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Docsify cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Docsify covers No build step, Single HTML entry point, Client-side full-text search, Plugin ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Docsify: Is Docsify bad for SEO?
Yes, by design. There is no static HTML for a crawler to read unless you add prerendering, which reintroduces the build step the tool exists to avoid. Choose a static generator if search traffic matters.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Docsify: Does it need Node.js to run?
Only for the local preview command. The published site is static files served by any web server, including GitHub Pages.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Docsify: How large a documentation set can it handle?
Comfortably a few dozen pages. Beyond that, client-side search and sidebar maintenance become the limiting factors rather than rendering speed.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Docsify: Can I add versioned documentation?
Not natively. The usual approach is a directory per version with its own sidebar, maintained manually.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs MkDocs
- Convoy vs Read the Docs
- Convoy vs BookStack
- Convoy vs VitePress
- Convoy vs Doxygen
- Convoy vs Sphinx
- Convoy vs Starlight
- Convoy vs Scalar
- Convoy vs Antora
- Convoy vs Redocly
- Convoy vs ReadMe
- Convoy vs Guidde
- Convoy vs Adobe FrameMaker
- Convoy vs Archbee
- Convoy vs Bump.sh
- Convoy vs Fumadocs
- Docsify vs Kong
- Docsify vs Svix
- Docsify vs Tyk
- Docsify vs Janus Gateway
- Docsify vs Appwrite
- Docsify vs Gravitee
- Docsify vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Docsify vs Formance
- Docsify vs AWS API Gateway
- Docsify vs Hasura
- Docsify vs PocketBase
- Docsify vs Sensedia
- Docsify vs Sila
- Docsify vs Swagger
- Docsify vs TIBCO Mashery
- Docsify vs Zeplo
- Docsify vs Kong Gateway
- Docsify vs MkDocs
- Docsify vs Read the Docs
- Docsify vs BookStack
- Docsify vs VitePress
- Docsify vs Doxygen
- Docsify vs Sphinx
- Docsify vs Starlight
- Docsify vs Scalar
- Docsify vs Antora
- Docsify vs Redocly
- Docsify vs ReadMe
- Docsify vs Guidde
- Docsify vs Adobe FrameMaker
- Docsify vs Archbee
- Docsify vs Bump.sh
- Docsify vs Fumadocs
