Network & Connectivity · head to head
Consul vs Vultr

Consul
Network & Connectivity
Service discovery, networking, and security
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Consul namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only; Vultr vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
- They diverge on capability: Consul covers Service discovery, Vultr covers Cloud servers.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Consul and Vultr actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2014).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Consul
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- Key/value store
- Multi-datacenter
- DNS interface
- Service mesh
- Load balancing
- Configuration management
Only in Vultr
- Cloud servers
- Bare metal servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
- Ansible
Both cover
- Kubernetes
- Terraform
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Consul
- Service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructurenot Vultr
- Running a service mesh with mutual TLS between servicesnot Vultr
- Distributed key value configuration storage for applicationsnot Vultr
Vultr
- High performance computingnot Consul
- Game serversnot Consul
- Streamingnot Consul
- Database hostingnot Consul
- Application serversnot Consul
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Consul
- Namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
- Audit logging, OIDC authentication and FIPS 140-2 builds require Consul Enterprise, so compliance driven deployments cannot use the free edition
- Automated backups, redundancy zones, read replicas and automated server upgrades are Enterprise only
- Long Term Support releases are Enterprise only, so community users must upgrade to stay supported
- Service mesh and advanced traffic management sit in the Premium Enterprise tier above Standard Enterprise
- HashiCorp does not publish a Consul rate on its pricing page, which lists per resource prices for Terraform instead
Vultr
- Vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Consul
Free- Open SourceFree
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- KV store
Vultr
Free- Cloud Compute$2.5/month
- 512MB RAM
- 10GB SSD
- 500GB bandwidth
- Bare Metal$32/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full root access
Which should you pick?
Choose Consul if
- You need service discovery.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want health checking.
Choose Vultr if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Consul or Vultr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Consul starts at Free and Vultr at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Consul or Vultr?
- Consul starts at Free and Vultr at Free.
- Does Consul or Vultr run on more platforms?
- Consul runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud. Vultr runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Consul for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Consul best used for?
- Consul is most often used for service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure, running a service mesh with mutual tls between services, distributed key value configuration storage for applications. Of those, service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure and running a service mesh with mutual tls between services are not what Vultr is typically brought in for.
- What can Consul do that Vultr cannot?
- Consul covers Service discovery, Health checking, Key/value store, Multi-datacenter. Vultr covers Cloud servers, Bare metal servers, Block storage, Object storage. Both handle Kubernetes, Terraform, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Consul vs Prometheus
- Consul vs Cloudflare
- Consul vs Grafana
- Consul vs Ivanti
- Consul vs Palo Alto Networks
- Consul vs Splunk
- Consul vs Tailscale
- Consul vs Traefik
- Consul vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Consul vs Grafana Cloud
- Consul vs Neon
- Consul vs DigitalOcean
- Consul vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Consul vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Consul vs Deno Deploy
- Consul vs Heroku
- Consul vs Hetzner Cloud
- Consul vs Linode
- Consul vs Packer
- Consul vs Pulumi
- Consul vs Render
- Consul vs Upstash
- Consul vs Vagrant
- Consul vs Akamai
- Consul vs Alibaba Cloud
- Consul vs Chef
- Consul vs Contabo
- Vultr vs Prometheus
- Vultr vs Cloudflare
- Vultr vs Grafana
- Vultr vs Ivanti
- Vultr vs Palo Alto Networks
- Vultr vs Splunk
- Vultr vs Tailscale
- Vultr vs Traefik
- Vultr vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Vultr vs Grafana Cloud
- Vultr vs Neon
- Vultr vs DigitalOcean
- Vultr vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vultr vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vultr vs Deno Deploy
- Vultr vs Heroku
- Vultr vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vultr vs Linode
- Vultr vs Packer
- Vultr vs Pulumi
- Vultr vs Render
- Vultr vs Upstash
- Vultr vs Vagrant
- Vultr vs Akamai
- Vultr vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vultr vs Chef
- Vultr vs Contabo

