Network & Connectivity · head to head
Consul vs Grafana

Consul
Network & Connectivity
Service discovery, networking, and security
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Consul namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only; Grafana the free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only
- They diverge on capability: Consul covers Service discovery, Grafana covers Dashboard creation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Consul and Grafana actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Network & Connectivity), founded (2014).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Consul
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- Key/value store
- Multi-datacenter
- DNS interface
- Service mesh
- Load balancing
- Configuration management
Only in Grafana
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
- Visualization plugins
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Consul
- Service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructurenot Grafana
- Running a service mesh with mutual TLS between servicesnot Grafana
- Distributed key value configuration storage for applicationsnot Grafana
Grafana
- Dashboards and visualisation over metrics, logs and tracesnot Consul
- Running observability across infrastructure and applicationsnot Consul
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Consul
- Namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
- Audit logging, OIDC authentication and FIPS 140-2 builds require Consul Enterprise, so compliance driven deployments cannot use the free edition
- Automated backups, redundancy zones, read replicas and automated server upgrades are Enterprise only
- Long Term Support releases are Enterprise only, so community users must upgrade to stay supported
- Service mesh and advanced traffic management sit in the Premium Enterprise tier above Standard Enterprise
- HashiCorp does not publish a Consul rate on its pricing page, which lists per resource prices for Terraform instead
Grafana
- The free tier retains metrics, logs and traces for 14 days only
- Free is capped at 10,000 active metric series and 50 GB each of logs and traces a month
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
- Logs and traces are billed on three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining data is an ongoing charge rather than a one off, so historical data costs every month it exists
Pricing, plan by plan
Consul
Free- Open SourceFree
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- KV store
Grafana
Free- FreeFree
- Dashboard creation
- Alerting
- Data source integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Consul if
- You need service discovery.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want health checking.
Choose Grafana if
- You need dashboard creation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want alerting.
Questions people ask
- Is Consul or Grafana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Consul starts at Free and Grafana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Consul or Grafana?
- Consul starts at Free and Grafana at Free.
- Does Consul or Grafana run on more platforms?
- Consul runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud. Grafana runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Consul for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Consul best used for?
- Consul is most often used for service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure, running a service mesh with mutual tls between services, distributed key value configuration storage for applications. Of those, service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure and running a service mesh with mutual tls between services are not what Grafana is typically brought in for.
- What can Consul do that Grafana cannot?
- Consul covers Service discovery, Health checking, Key/value store, Multi-datacenter. Grafana covers Dashboard creation, Alerting, Data source integration, Visualization plugins.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Consul vs Prometheus
- Consul vs Cloudflare
- Consul vs Ivanti
- Consul vs Palo Alto Networks
- Consul vs Splunk
- Consul vs Tailscale
- Consul vs Traefik
- Consul vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Grafana vs Prometheus
- Grafana vs Cloudflare
- Grafana vs Ivanti
- Grafana vs Palo Alto Networks
- Grafana vs Splunk
- Grafana vs Tailscale
- Grafana vs Traefik
- Grafana vs Ubiquiti UniFi

