Agriculture · head to head
Conservis vs Gallagher eShepherd

Conservis
Agriculture
Comprehensive farm management for row crops
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Gallagher eShepherd
Agriculture
Virtual fencing where you own the solar collars outright and pay only a small monthly connectivity fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Conservis acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio; Gallagher eShepherd gallagher does not publish neckband prices, quoting instead by herd size, region and connectivity type, so the ownership-versus-lease advantage over subscription rivals cannot be verified without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Gallagher eShepherd covers Map-drawn virtual paddocks.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Conservis and Gallagher eShepherd actually diverge.
| Attribute | Conservis | Gallagher eShepherd |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Conservis
- Field & crop planning
- Input management
- Activity tracking
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Equipment tracking
- Harvest tracking
- Custom reporting
Only in Gallagher eShepherd
- Map-drawn virtual paddocks
- Audio cue then pulse
- Solar neckband
- Cellular or LoRa connectivity
- Animal location tracking
- Grazing rotation management
- Exclusion zones
- Behaviour alerts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Conservis
- Farm ERP covering the business rather than the agronomynot Gallagher eShepherd
- Grain contract managementnot Gallagher eShepherd
- Crop planning and budgeting against actualsnot Gallagher eShepherd
- Work order management across an operationnot Gallagher eShepherd
- Reporting plans versus actuals for lenders and partnersnot Gallagher eShepherd
Gallagher eShepherd
- A ranch subdividing a 2,000 acre paddock for rotational grazing without buying a mile of wirenot Conservis
- A grazier fencing cattle out of a creek line for a stewardship scheme without building riparian fencenot Conservis
- An operation on leased ground where permanent fencing is not permitted or not recoverablenot Conservis
- A farm short of labour that needs paddock moves done from a phone rather than a quad bikenot Conservis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Conservis
- Acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio
Gallagher eShepherd
- Gallagher does not publish neckband prices, quoting instead by herd size, region and connectivity type, so the ownership-versus-lease advantage over subscription rivals cannot be verified without a sales conversation.
- A minimum of about 20 animals is needed to train a mob, which rules out smallholders and makes the system awkward for operations that run many small separate groups.
- It is cattle only: sheep, goats and deer are not supported, so a mixed grazing enterprise still needs conventional fencing for everything else.
- The connectivity fee is per active neckband and continues indefinitely, so the collars are yours but the system stops fencing if you stop paying, which is the same dependency as a subscription with a different label.
- Virtual fencing is regulated inconsistently: some jurisdictions restrict or have not yet ruled on aversive-stimulus containment, and welfare-scheme or organic certifier acceptance varies, so eligibility should be checked locally before ordering.
Pricing, plan by plan
Conservis
On request- Standard$undefined/year
- Field management
- Activity tracking
- Basic reporting
- Professional$undefined/year
- Everything in Standard
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Everything in Professional
- Multi-entity management
- API access
Gallagher eShepherd
On request- eShepherd neckband$undefined/year
- Neckbands purchased outright, not leased per head
- Small fixed monthly connectivity fee per active neckband
- Fees charged only on active bands
Which should you pick?
Choose Conservis if
- You need field & crop planning.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want input management.
Choose Gallagher eShepherd if
- You need map-drawn virtual paddocks.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want audio cue then pulse.
Questions people ask
- Is Conservis or Gallagher eShepherd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Conservis starts at On request and Gallagher eShepherd at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Conservis or Gallagher eShepherd?
- Conservis starts at On request and Gallagher eShepherd at On request.
- Does Conservis or Gallagher eShepherd run on more platforms?
- Conservis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Gallagher eShepherd runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Conservis best used for?
- Conservis is most often used for farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy, grain contract management, crop planning and budgeting against actuals, work order management across an operation. Of those, farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy and grain contract management are not what Gallagher eShepherd is typically brought in for.
- What can Conservis do that Gallagher eShepherd cannot?
- Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Input management, Activity tracking, Financial management. Gallagher eShepherd covers Map-drawn virtual paddocks, Audio cue then pulse, Solar neckband, Cellular or LoRa connectivity.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gallagher eShepherd: Do I lease the collars or own them?
You buy them outright. The ongoing cost is a small monthly connectivity fee per active neckband, not a per-head lease.
Gallagher eShepherd: Do I need base stations?
Not with the cellular version, which uses existing mobile networks. The LoRa version needs small on-property base stations and suits areas with poor coverage.
Gallagher eShepherd: How many cattle do I need?
At least 20 to train a mob, after which groups can be split into smaller mobs as long as each contains leaders and followers.
Gallagher eShepherd: Does it work for sheep?
No. eShepherd is a cattle system.
Related pages
More on Gallagher eShepherd
Other head to heads
- Conservis vs FarmERP
- Conservis vs Granular
- Conservis vs Farmbrite
- Conservis vs fieldmargin
- Conservis vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Conservis vs CropX
- Conservis vs AgriSync
- Conservis vs Bushel
- Conservis vs AgriWebb
- Conservis vs CropTracker Pro
- Conservis vs PrecisionHawk
- Conservis vs Netafim NetBeat
- Conservis vs Nofence
- Conservis vs Sentera
- Conservis vs SMARTBOW
- Conservis vs Soil Scout
- Conservis vs 365FarmNet
- Conservis vs Bushel Farm
- Conservis vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Conservis vs Halter
- Conservis vs CattleMax
- Conservis vs Herdwatch
- Conservis vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Conservis vs GEA DairyNet
- Conservis vs Datamars Livestock
- Conservis vs Lely Horizon
- Conservis vs AgriWater
- Conservis vs Agronomic
- Conservis vs CeresAI
- Conservis vs Cropin
- Gallagher eShepherd vs FarmERP
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Granular
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Farmbrite
- Gallagher eShepherd vs fieldmargin
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CropX
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriSync
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Bushel
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriWebb
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CropTracker Pro
- Gallagher eShepherd vs PrecisionHawk
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Netafim NetBeat
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Nofence
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Sentera
- Gallagher eShepherd vs SMARTBOW
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Soil Scout
- Gallagher eShepherd vs 365FarmNet
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Bushel Farm
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Halter
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CattleMax
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Herdwatch
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Gallagher eShepherd vs GEA DairyNet
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Datamars Livestock
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Lely Horizon
- Gallagher eShepherd vs AgriWater
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Agronomic
- Gallagher eShepherd vs CeresAI
- Gallagher eShepherd vs Cropin
