Software · head to head
Bushel vs Conservis
The short version
- Only Bushel has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bushel pricing is not published for the agribusiness products; Conservis acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio
- They diverge on capability: Bushel covers Digital scale tickets, Conservis covers Field & crop planning.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bushel and Conservis actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bushel
- Digital scale tickets
- Contract management
- Settlement tracking
- Delivery scheduling
- Multi-location management
- Price notifications
- Offer management
- Mobile access
Only in Conservis
- Field & crop planning
- Input management
- Activity tracking
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Equipment tracking
- Harvest tracking
- Custom reporting
Both cover
- SOC2
- SSL
- Data encryption
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bushel
- Grain trading and contract workflows between farmers and elevatorsnot Conservis
- Payments between agribusinesses and growersnot Conservis
- Quoting and CRM for ag retailersnot Conservis
- Replacing paper processes across the grain supply chainnot Conservis
Conservis
- Farm ERP covering the business rather than the agronomynot Bushel
- Grain contract managementnot Bushel
- Crop planning and budgeting against actualsnot Bushel
- Work order management across an operationnot Bushel
- Reporting plans versus actuals for lenders and partnersnot Bushel
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bushel
- Pricing is not published for the agribusiness products
- Sold as many separate modules, including CRM, portals, Trade, Bushel Pay, quoting and loyalty
- Its value depends on network effects across the 3,500 grain and ag retail facilities already connected
Conservis
- Acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Bushel
Free- Bushel FarmFree
- Grain contracts & settlements
- Scale ticket access
- Delivery scheduling
- Bushel for Elevators$undefined/month
- Customer portal
- Mobile ticketing
- Offer management
Conservis
On request- Standard$undefined/year
- Field management
- Activity tracking
- Basic reporting
- Professional$undefined/year
- Everything in Standard
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Everything in Professional
- Multi-entity management
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Bushel if
- You need digital scale tickets.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want contract management.
Choose Conservis if
- You need field & crop planning.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want input management.
Questions people ask
- Is Bushel or Conservis better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bushel starts at Free and Conservis at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bushel or Conservis?
- Bushel has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bushel and On request for Conservis.
- Does Bushel or Conservis run on more platforms?
- Bushel runs on Web, Ios, Android. Conservis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- Can I use Bushel for free?
- Yes. Bushel has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Conservis starts at On request.
- What is Bushel best used for?
- Bushel is most often used for grain trading and contract workflows between farmers and elevators, payments between agribusinesses and growers, quoting and crm for ag retailers, replacing paper processes across the grain supply chain. Of those, grain trading and contract workflows between farmers and elevators and payments between agribusinesses and growers are not what Conservis is typically brought in for.
- What can Bushel do that Conservis cannot?
- Bushel covers Digital scale tickets, Contract management, Settlement tracking, Delivery scheduling. Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Input management, Activity tracking, Financial management. Both handle SOC2, SSL, Data encryption, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bushel vs CropX
- Bushel vs Granular
- Bushel vs AgriSync
- Bushel vs FarmLogs
- Bushel vs MyJohnDeere
- Bushel vs 365FarmNet
- Bushel vs Ag-Analytics
- Bushel vs Ag Leader
- Bushel vs AgCode
- Bushel vs Agrivi
- Bushel vs AgriWater
- Bushel vs AgriWebb
- Bushel vs Agronomic
- Bushel vs Agworld
- Bushel vs Arable
- Bushel vs Bushel Farm
- Bushel vs CattleMax
- Conservis vs CropX
- Conservis vs Granular
- Conservis vs AgriSync
- Conservis vs FarmLogs
- Conservis vs MyJohnDeere
- Conservis vs 365FarmNet
- Conservis vs Ag-Analytics
- Conservis vs Ag Leader
- Conservis vs AgCode
- Conservis vs Agrivi
- Conservis vs AgriWater
- Conservis vs AgriWebb
- Conservis vs Agronomic
- Conservis vs Agworld
- Conservis vs Arable
- Conservis vs Bushel Farm
- Conservis vs CattleMax


