Softwr

Software · head to head

Agronomic vs Conservis

A

Agronomic

Software

Data-driven nutrient management

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Conservis logo

Conservis

Software

Comprehensive farm management for row crops

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Agronomic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Agronomic add-on only to FieldAlytics, not a standalone product; Conservis acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio
  • They diverge on capability: Agronomic covers Soil analysis, Conservis covers Field & crop planning.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Agronomic and Conservis actually diverge.

Attributes where Agronomic and Conservis differ
AttributeAgronomicConservis
Starting priceFreeOn request
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, MobileWeb, Ios, Android, Api
Founded20132009

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Agronomic

  • Soil analysis
  • Nutrient recommendations
  • Variable rate maps
  • Tissue testing
  • Fertility planning
  • Ag Leader
  • Laboratory systems
  • Ios support

Only in Conservis

  • Field & crop planning
  • Input management
  • Activity tracking
  • Financial management
  • Inventory control
  • Equipment tracking
  • Harvest tracking
  • Custom reporting

Both cover

  • Climate FieldView
  • John Deere
  • SSL
  • Data encryption
  • Cloud deployment
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Agronomic

  • Soil samplingnot Conservis
  • Nutrient planningnot Conservis
  • Variable rate fertilizernot Conservis
  • Crop consultingnot Conservis

Conservis

  • Farm ERP covering the business rather than the agronomynot Agronomic
  • Grain contract managementnot Agronomic
  • Crop planning and budgeting against actualsnot Agronomic
  • Work order management across an operationnot Agronomic
  • Reporting plans versus actuals for lenders and partnersnot Agronomic

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Agronomic

  • Add-on only to FieldAlytics, not a standalone product
  • Pricing requires sales contact, not transparently published
  • Takes 3-4 days to reflect rainfall impacts in recommendations
  • No direct competitor to Climate FieldView's broader analytics capabilities

Conservis

  • Acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio

Pricing, plan by plan

Agronomic

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Basic soil analysis
    • Weather data
    • Limited recommendations
  • Professional$89/month
    • Advanced soil testing
    • Nutrient management
    • Prescription maps
  • Consultant$199/month
    • Multi-client management
    • White-label reports
    • API access

Conservis

On request
  • Standard$undefined/year
    • Field management
    • Activity tracking
    • Basic reporting
  • Professional$undefined/year
    • Everything in Standard
    • Financial management
    • Inventory control
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Everything in Professional
    • Multi-entity management
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Agronomic if

  • You need soil analysis.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Mobile.
  • You also want nutrient recommendations.
Agronomic review

Choose Conservis if

  • You need field & crop planning.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want input management.
Conservis review

Questions people ask

Is Agronomic or Conservis better?
Neither clearly leads. Agronomic starts at Free and Conservis at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Agronomic or Conservis?
Agronomic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Agronomic and On request for Conservis.
Does Agronomic or Conservis run on more platforms?
Agronomic runs on Web, Mobile. Conservis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
Can I use Agronomic for free?
Yes. Agronomic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Conservis starts at On request.
What is Agronomic best used for?
Agronomic is most often used for soil sampling, nutrient planning, variable rate fertilizer, crop consulting. Of those, soil sampling and nutrient planning are not what Conservis is typically brought in for.
What can Agronomic do that Conservis cannot?
Agronomic covers Soil analysis, Nutrient recommendations, Variable rate maps, Tissue testing. Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Input management, Activity tracking, Financial management. Both handle Climate FieldView, John Deere, SSL, Data encryption.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Agronomic: How does Adapt-N generate nitrogen recommendations?

Adapt-N uses 13 interconnected models that process soil characteristics, crop history, real-time weather data, manure applications, and irrigation information to generate field-specific nitrogen recommendations. It requires a minimum of 7 core data inputs, though spatial data significantly improves accuracy.

Source
Agronomic: Where is Adapt-N available?

Adapt-N is available across the lower 48 U.S. states and six Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec.

Source
Agronomic: Is Adapt-N a standalone product or add-on?

Adapt-N is an optional paid add-on service for FieldAlytics users. It is not available as a standalone product; farmers must use it through the FieldAlytics platform via Ever.Ag.

Source
Agronomic: How long does Adapt-N take to reflect weather changes?

Adapt-N takes 3 to 4 days after rainfall events to fully reflect environmental impacts in its nitrogen recommendations.

Source
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Agronomic

More on Conservis

Keep looking

Other head to heads