Agriculture · head to head
Conservis vs Soil Scout

Conservis
Agriculture
Comprehensive farm management for row crops
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Soil Scout
Agriculture
Buried wireless soil sensors with a ten to twenty year battery and no cables to the surface
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Conservis acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio; Soil Scout sensors are unserviceable once buried, so a failed or drifting unit means excavation and the confidence you place in a single reading has no easy verification.
- They diverge on capability: Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Soil Scout covers Fully buried sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Conservis and Soil Scout actually diverge.
| Attribute | Conservis | Soil Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Conservis
- Field & crop planning
- Input management
- Activity tracking
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Equipment tracking
- Harvest tracking
- Custom reporting
Only in Soil Scout
- Fully buried sensors
- Ten to twenty year battery
- Underground radio
- Dual depth sensing
- Moisture, temperature and salinity
- Soil Scout Hub
- Web service API
- Long base station range
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Conservis
- Farm ERP covering the business rather than the agronomynot Soil Scout
- Grain contract managementnot Soil Scout
- Crop planning and budgeting against actualsnot Soil Scout
- Work order management across an operationnot Soil Scout
- Reporting plans versus actuals for lenders and partnersnot Soil Scout
Soil Scout
- A golf course monitoring greens moisture where a surface-mounted probe would be hit by mowers and playnot Conservis
- A stadium pitch under a closed roof where hand-held probing is impractical during the seasonnot Conservis
- A research plot needing consistent multi-year soil data below cultivation depthnot Conservis
- An irrigated field where a surface logger would not survive tillage or a spray boomnot Conservis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Conservis
- Acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio
Soil Scout
- Sensors are unserviceable once buried, so a failed or drifting unit means excavation and the confidence you place in a single reading has no easy verification.
- No pricing is published at all, which makes it hard to justify against commodity probes that quote openly, and per-sensor cost is well above the alternatives.
- It measures but does not control, so tying moisture readings to actual irrigation decisions requires either manual interpretation or a separate integration project with the control system.
- Underground radio range depends on soil type and moisture; heavy wet clay attenuates the signal and can force more base stations than the headline kilometre figure suggests.
- The company is small and Finland-based, so outside its established golf and sports turf distribution the support, spares and installation expertise depend entirely on whether a competent local distributor exists.
Pricing, plan by plan
Conservis
On request- Standard$undefined/year
- Field management
- Activity tracking
- Basic reporting
- Professional$undefined/year
- Everything in Standard
- Financial management
- Inventory control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Everything in Professional
- Multi-entity management
- API access
Soil Scout
On request- Soil Scout$undefined/year
- Sensors and base station quoted per site
- Hub subscription terms quoted with the hardware
- No individual sensor data plans required
Which should you pick?
Choose Conservis if
- You need field & crop planning.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want input management.
Choose Soil Scout if
- You need fully buried sensors.
- You also want ten to twenty year battery.
Questions people ask
- Is Conservis or Soil Scout better?
- Neither clearly leads. Conservis starts at On request and Soil Scout at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Conservis or Soil Scout?
- Conservis starts at On request and Soil Scout at On request.
- Does Conservis or Soil Scout run on more platforms?
- Conservis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Soil Scout runs on Web.
- What is Conservis best used for?
- Conservis is most often used for farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy, grain contract management, crop planning and budgeting against actuals, work order management across an operation. Of those, farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy and grain contract management are not what Soil Scout is typically brought in for.
- What can Conservis do that Soil Scout cannot?
- Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Input management, Activity tracking, Financial management. Soil Scout covers Fully buried sensors, Ten to twenty year battery, Underground radio, Dual depth sensing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Soil Scout: How long do the sensors last?
Up to ten years for the Happi100 and up to twenty for the Hydra100, buried, with no battery replacement.
Soil Scout: Do the sensors need mobile data plans?
No. Sensors transmit to a base station through the soil, and only the base station uses a cellular modem.
Soil Scout: Can it control irrigation directly?
No. It is a measurement and alerting system; controlling valves needs an integration with your irrigation controller through the API.
Soil Scout: What happens if a buried sensor fails?
You dig it up. There is no remote service option, which is the trade-off for having nothing above ground to damage.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Conservis vs FarmERP
- Conservis vs Granular
- Conservis vs Farmbrite
- Conservis vs fieldmargin
- Conservis vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Conservis vs CropX
- Conservis vs AgriSync
- Conservis vs Bushel
- Conservis vs AgriWebb
- Conservis vs CropTracker Pro
- Conservis vs PrecisionHawk
- Conservis vs Netafim NetBeat
- Conservis vs Nofence
- Conservis vs Sentera
- Conservis vs SMARTBOW
- Conservis vs 365FarmNet
- Conservis vs Bushel Farm
- Conservis vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Conservis vs Arable
- Conservis vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Conservis vs Teralytic
- Conservis vs Tucor
- Conservis vs AgriWater
- Conservis vs WiseConn DropControl
- Conservis vs Baseline Irrigation
- Conservis vs Galcon
- Conservis vs CeresAI
- Conservis vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Conservis vs Pix4Dfields
- Conservis vs Proagrica
- Conservis vs Produce Pro
- Conservis vs Raven Slingshot
- Conservis vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Soil Scout vs FarmERP
- Soil Scout vs Granular
- Soil Scout vs Farmbrite
- Soil Scout vs fieldmargin
- Soil Scout vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Soil Scout vs CropX
- Soil Scout vs AgriSync
- Soil Scout vs Bushel
- Soil Scout vs AgriWebb
- Soil Scout vs CropTracker Pro
- Soil Scout vs PrecisionHawk
- Soil Scout vs Netafim NetBeat
- Soil Scout vs Nofence
- Soil Scout vs Sentera
- Soil Scout vs SMARTBOW
- Soil Scout vs 365FarmNet
- Soil Scout vs Bushel Farm
- Soil Scout vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Soil Scout vs Arable
- Soil Scout vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Soil Scout vs Teralytic
- Soil Scout vs Tucor
- Soil Scout vs AgriWater
- Soil Scout vs WiseConn DropControl
- Soil Scout vs Baseline Irrigation
- Soil Scout vs Galcon
- Soil Scout vs CeresAI
- Soil Scout vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Soil Scout vs Pix4Dfields
- Soil Scout vs Proagrica
- Soil Scout vs Produce Pro
- Soil Scout vs Raven Slingshot
- Soil Scout vs Reinke ReinCloud
