Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Very Good Security

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only ConfigCat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | ConfigCat | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | Per month by feature flag and environment count | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Very Good Security
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Very Good Security
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Very Good Security
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot ConfigCat
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot ConfigCat
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot ConfigCat
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Very Good Security?
- ConfigCat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ConfigCat and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does ConfigCat or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Yes. ConfigCat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Very Good Security cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
ConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
ConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- ConfigCat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ConfigCat vs Cody
- ConfigCat vs Cortex
- ConfigCat vs Baffle
- ConfigCat vs HashiCorp Vault
- ConfigCat vs Feedzai
- ConfigCat vs Securiti
- ConfigCat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- ConfigCat vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- ConfigCat vs LastPass
- ConfigCat vs DataGrail
- ConfigCat vs 1Password
- ConfigCat vs Transcend
- ConfigCat vs Doppler
- ConfigCat vs Tuta
- ConfigCat vs Delinea
- ConfigCat vs Envysion
- ConfigCat vs Frontegg
- ConfigCat vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Nix
- Very Good Security vs Depot
- Very Good Security vs Blacksmith
- Very Good Security vs WarpBuild
- Very Good Security vs Namespace
- Very Good Security vs OpsLevel
- Very Good Security vs Earthly
- Very Good Security vs Ansible
- Very Good Security vs Garden
- Very Good Security vs Okteto
- Very Good Security vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Very Good Security vs Bazel
- Very Good Security vs Backstage
- Very Good Security vs Bitbucket
- Very Good Security vs Claude Code
- Very Good Security vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Very Good Security vs Cody
- Very Good Security vs Cortex
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
