Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Veracode

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only ConfigCat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Veracode actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Veracode
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Veracode
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Veracode
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot ConfigCat
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot ConfigCat
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot ConfigCat
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot ConfigCat
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Veracode?
- ConfigCat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ConfigCat and On request for Veracode.
- Does ConfigCat or Veracode run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Veracode runs on web, api.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Yes. ConfigCat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Veracode starts at On request.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Veracode cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Veracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- ConfigCat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ConfigCat vs Cody
- ConfigCat vs Cortex
- ConfigCat vs Semgrep
- ConfigCat vs Legit Security
- ConfigCat vs Aikido
- ConfigCat vs Snyk
- ConfigCat vs Endor Labs
- ConfigCat vs Tenable
- ConfigCat vs Acunetix
- ConfigCat vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- ConfigCat vs Recorded Future
- ConfigCat vs Tanium
- ConfigCat vs Trivy
- ConfigCat vs Grype
- ConfigCat vs Quantexa
- ConfigCat vs Termly
- ConfigCat vs Transcend
- ConfigCat vs WireGuard
- ConfigCat vs Akeyless
- ConfigCat vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs Nix
- Veracode vs Depot
- Veracode vs Blacksmith
- Veracode vs WarpBuild
- Veracode vs Namespace
- Veracode vs OpsLevel
- Veracode vs Earthly
- Veracode vs Ansible
- Veracode vs Garden
- Veracode vs Okteto
- Veracode vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Veracode vs Bazel
- Veracode vs Backstage
- Veracode vs Bitbucket
- Veracode vs Claude Code
- Veracode vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Veracode vs Cody
- Veracode vs Cortex
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail
