Cybersecurity · head to head
Akeyless vs ConfigCat

Akeyless
Cybersecurity
Runtime identity security at agentic scale
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akeyless pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation; ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- They diverge on capability: Akeyless covers Secrets management, ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akeyless and ConfigCat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Akeyless | ConfigCat |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based pricing units that vary by product module | Per month by feature flag and environment count |
| Platforms | Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises | Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akeyless
- Secrets management
- Machine identity
- AI agent identity
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Multi-vault governance
- Encryption and KMS
- Password manager
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akeyless
- Securing AI agents with dedicated identity trackingnot ConfigCat
- Managing machine-to-machine credentials at scalenot ConfigCat
- Automating PKI and certificate lifecyclenot ConfigCat
- Implementing just-in-time privileged accessnot ConfigCat
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Akeyless
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Akeyless
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Akeyless
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Akeyless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akeyless
- Pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation
- Free tier is very limited with restricted access
- No transparent pricing published for enterprise features
- Pricing model varies significantly by product module
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akeyless
Free- FreeFree
- Limited feature access
- Restricted usage quotas
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing based on usage
- Unlimited resource quotas
- Full feature access
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Which should you pick?
Choose Akeyless if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises.
- You also want machine identity.
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Questions people ask
- Is Akeyless or ConfigCat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akeyless starts at Free and ConfigCat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akeyless or ConfigCat?
- Akeyless starts at Free and ConfigCat at Free.
- Does Akeyless or ConfigCat run on more platforms?
- Akeyless runs on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises. ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- Can I use Akeyless for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Akeyless best used for?
- Akeyless is most often used for securing ai agents with dedicated identity tracking, managing machine-to-machine credentials at scale, automating pki and certificate lifecycle, implementing just-in-time privileged access. Of those, securing ai agents with dedicated identity tracking and managing machine-to-machine credentials at scale are not what ConfigCat is typically brought in for.
- What can Akeyless do that ConfigCat cannot?
- Akeyless covers Secrets management, Machine identity, AI agent identity, Certificate management. ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akeyless: What pricing model does Akeyless use?
Akeyless uses usage-based pricing units that vary by product. For example, Secrets Management is priced by clients, Certificate Management by managed certificates, Encryption by transactions, and PAM by users. Contact sales for a custom quote.
SourceConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Akeyless: Does Akeyless support hybrid deployment?
Yes, Akeyless offers Pure SaaS cloud-managed deployment and Hybrid SaaS with on-premise gateways and zero-knowledge encryption for sensitive environments.
SourceConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Akeyless: How does Akeyless handle AI agent identities?
Akeyless provides dedicated AI agent identity tracking with runtime access control, allowing organizations to manage AI agent access separately from human and machine identities.
SourceConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akeyless vs Infisical
- Akeyless vs Doppler
- Akeyless vs HashiCorp Vault
- Akeyless vs Frontegg
- Akeyless vs Endor Labs
- Akeyless vs Aikido
- Akeyless vs Speakeasy
- Akeyless vs Keeper Password Manager
- Akeyless vs Delinea
- Akeyless vs Chainguard
- Akeyless vs Tenable
- Akeyless vs Sticky Password
- Akeyless vs Grype
- Akeyless vs Hanwha Vision
- Akeyless vs Idira
- Akeyless vs IVPN
- Akeyless vs Logto
- Akeyless vs Malwarebytes
- Akeyless vs Nix
- Akeyless vs Depot
- Akeyless vs Blacksmith
- Akeyless vs WarpBuild
- Akeyless vs Namespace
- Akeyless vs OpsLevel
- Akeyless vs Earthly
- Akeyless vs Ansible
- Akeyless vs Garden
- Akeyless vs Okteto
- Akeyless vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Akeyless vs Bazel
- Akeyless vs Backstage
- Akeyless vs Bitbucket
- Akeyless vs Claude Code
- Akeyless vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Akeyless vs Cody
- Akeyless vs Cortex
- ConfigCat vs Infisical
- ConfigCat vs Doppler
- ConfigCat vs HashiCorp Vault
- ConfigCat vs Frontegg
- ConfigCat vs Endor Labs
- ConfigCat vs Aikido
- ConfigCat vs Speakeasy
- ConfigCat vs Keeper Password Manager
- ConfigCat vs Delinea
- ConfigCat vs Chainguard
- ConfigCat vs Tenable
- ConfigCat vs Sticky Password
- ConfigCat vs Grype
- ConfigCat vs Hanwha Vision
- ConfigCat vs Idira
- ConfigCat vs IVPN
- ConfigCat vs Logto
- ConfigCat vs Malwarebytes
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- ConfigCat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ConfigCat vs Cody
- ConfigCat vs Cortex
