Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Deno

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Deno
Developer Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Deno egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Deno actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that ConfigCat does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Deno
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Deno
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Deno
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Deno
Deno
- Running TypeScript natively without transpilation overheadnot ConfigCat
- Migrating Node.js applications to secure-by-default runtimenot ConfigCat
- Deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlesslynot ConfigCat
- Consolidating developer tools into single binarynot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Deno
- Egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- CPU time overage is $0.10/hour on Pro and Builder tiers, adding to costs for compute-intensive workloads
- Enterprise pricing is not disclosed; requires sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Deno
Free- FreeFree
- 1 million requests/month
- 20GB egress bandwidth
- 10 apps
- Pro$20/month
- 5 million requests/month
- 200GB egress
- 50 apps
- Builder$200/month
- 25 million requests/month
- 2,000GB egress
- 10,000 apps
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom limits on all metrics
- 99.95% reliability SLA
- Email support with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Deno better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Deno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Deno?
- ConfigCat starts at Free and Deno at Free.
- Does ConfigCat or Deno run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Deno runs on Web.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Deno is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Deno cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Deno: How much does Deno Deploy cost?
Deno Deploy offers a free tier at $0/month, Pro at $20/month, and Builder at $200/month. Enterprise has custom pricing. All plans include base request and bandwidth limits, with overage charges for additional usage.
SourceConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Deno: What are Deno Deploy's overage charges?
Egress bandwidth overages cost $0.20 per GB. CPU time overages are $0.10 per hour on Pro and Builder tiers. Memory time and KV database operations also incur charges beyond included limits.
SourceConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
Deno: How many apps can I deploy on Deno's free plan?
The free tier includes 10 apps with up to 1 concurrent build. Pro tier supports 50 apps with 3 concurrent builds, and Builder supports 10,000 apps with 20 concurrent builds.
SourceConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Deno: How many team members can access Deno Deploy?
The free tier supports up to 3 team members. Pro supports 10 team members. Builder supports 25 team members. Enterprise has custom seat limits.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Fig
- ConfigCat vs Frappe
- ConfigCat vs Git
- ConfigCat vs GoLand
- ConfigCat vs Hookdeck
- ConfigCat vs JFrog Artifactory
- ConfigCat vs Turborepo
- ConfigCat vs ESLint
- ConfigCat vs pnpm
- ConfigCat vs Visual Studio Code
- ConfigCat vs Jitsu
- ConfigCat vs Argo CD
- ConfigCat vs Restate
- ConfigCat vs Soketi
- ConfigCat vs Keil MDK
- ConfigCat vs Vite
- ConfigCat vs RubyMine
- ConfigCat vs SonarQube
- ConfigCat vs Sourcegraph
- ConfigCat vs Sweep
- ConfigCat vs Visual Studio
- Deno vs Nix
- Deno vs Depot
- Deno vs Blacksmith
- Deno vs WarpBuild
- Deno vs Namespace
- Deno vs OpsLevel
- Deno vs Earthly
- Deno vs Ansible
- Deno vs Garden
- Deno vs Okteto
- Deno vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Deno vs Bazel
- Deno vs Fig
- Deno vs Frappe
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs GoLand
- Deno vs Hookdeck
- Deno vs JFrog Artifactory
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs ESLint
- Deno vs pnpm
- Deno vs Visual Studio Code
- Deno vs Jitsu
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Restate
- Deno vs Soketi
- Deno vs Keil MDK
- Deno vs Vite
- Deno vs RubyMine
- Deno vs SonarQube
- Deno vs Sourcegraph
- Deno vs Sweep
- Deno vs Visual Studio
