CAD · head to head
COMSOL Multiphysics vs Modo

COMSOL Multiphysics
CAD
Finite element simulation built around coupling physics, with add-on modules licensed separately
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: COMSOL Multiphysics the base licence covers very little on its own and nearly every practical problem needs one or more add-on modules, each priced separately, so the quoted total is typically a multiple of the headline base figure.; Modo foundry announced on November 7, 2024 that it is winding down development of Modo after the Modo 17.1 release, with no further feature or maintenance releases anticipated
- They diverge on capability: COMSOL Multiphysics covers Coupled multiphysics solving, Modo covers Polygon modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which COMSOL Multiphysics and Modo actually diverge.
| Attribute | COMSOL Multiphysics | Modo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $29/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, macOS | Windows, MacOS, Linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in COMSOL Multiphysics
- Coupled multiphysics solving
- Equation-based modelling
- Add-on module library
- Application Builder
- COMSOL Compiler and Server
- CAD import and LiveLink
- Parametric sweeps and optimisation
- Cluster and cloud computing
Only in Modo
- Polygon modeling
- Subdivision surfaces
- Sculpting
- UV tools
- Procedural modeling
- Rendering
- Animation
- MeshFusion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
COMSOL Multiphysics
- Modelling a device where physics are strongly coupled, such as induction heating that changes material properties which change the fieldnot Modo
- Research work needing custom partial differential equations that no packaged solver in a mainstream tool providesnot Modo
- Packaging a validated model as an app so process engineers can run studies without learning the simulation toolnot Modo
- A department wanting shared concurrent access via a Floating Network Licence, with cluster runs at no extra licence costnot Modo
Modo
- Polygon and subdivision surface modelling for media and entertainment assetsnot COMSOL Multiphysics
- Look development and rendering of product and character modelsnot COMSOL Multiphysics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
COMSOL Multiphysics
- The base licence covers very little on its own and nearly every practical problem needs one or more add-on modules, each priced separately, so the quoted total is typically a multiple of the headline base figure.
- Perpetual licences renew maintenance at 20% of the then-current price each year, and because that percentage applies to the whole module stack the annual bill grows as your module list does and as list prices rise.
- No pricing at all is published, so procurement cannot benchmark or budget without a sales engagement, and comparisons against Ansys or SolidWorks Simulation are effectively impossible before that point.
- Named Single-User and CPU-locked licences do not share, so a team of six that bought individual licences ends up with idle seats while a Floating Network Licence would have covered them, and switching licence type is a commercial renegotiation.
- Solving strongly coupled systems is memory hungry and slow, and models that look modest in the GUI routinely need tens of gigabytes of RAM, so hardware cost is a real and often underestimated part of adoption.
Modo
- Foundry announced on November 7, 2024 that it is winding down development of Modo after the Modo 17.1 release, with no further feature or maintenance releases anticipated
- Support continues only until each customer's current contract term expires
- Foundry does not guarantee that Modo will keep working on future operating system updates because no patches will be issued, and recommends customers migrate to alternative 3D workflows
- Perpetual licences keep working but receive no further updates, bug fixes or support
- The Modo forums closed in December 2024 and downloads, docs and the support knowledgebase were committed only until November 2025
Pricing, plan by plan
COMSOL Multiphysics
On request- COMSOL Multiphysics base licence$undefined/year
- CPU-locked, Named Single-User or Floating Network licence types
- Perpetual or term licensing
- Perpetual includes updates and support for 12 months, then renews at 20% of current price
- Academic licences$undefined/year
- Class Kit Licence for up to 30 concurrent users per class
- Academic Server Licence for up to 300 concurrent app users
- Quote through the academic sales channel
Modo
$29/month- Indie$599/month
- Full Modo
- Revenue limit $100K
- Modo$1898/month
- Full commercial license
Which should you pick?
Choose COMSOL Multiphysics if
- You need coupled multiphysics solving.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want equation-based modelling.
Choose Modo if
- You need polygon modeling.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want subdivision surfaces.
Questions people ask
- Is COMSOL Multiphysics or Modo better?
- Neither clearly leads. COMSOL Multiphysics starts at On request and Modo at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, COMSOL Multiphysics or Modo?
- COMSOL Multiphysics starts at On request and Modo at $29/month.
- Does COMSOL Multiphysics or Modo run on more platforms?
- COMSOL Multiphysics runs on Windows, Linux, macOS. Modo runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- What is COMSOL Multiphysics best used for?
- COMSOL Multiphysics is most often used for modelling a device where physics are strongly coupled, such as induction heating that changes material properties which change the field, research work needing custom partial differential equations that no packaged solver in a mainstream tool provides, packaging a validated model as an app so process engineers can run studies without learning the simulation tool, a department wanting shared concurrent access via a floating network licence, with cluster runs at no extra licence cost. Of those, modelling a device where physics are strongly coupled, such as induction heating that changes material properties which change the field and research work needing custom partial differential equations that no packaged solver in a mainstream tool provides are not what Modo is typically brought in for.
- What can COMSOL Multiphysics do that Modo cannot?
- COMSOL Multiphysics covers Coupled multiphysics solving, Equation-based modelling, Add-on module library, Application Builder. Modo covers Polygon modeling, Subdivision surfaces, Sculpting, UV tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
COMSOL Multiphysics: Does the base licence include CFD or structural mechanics?
Only limited capability. Serious CFD, structural, RF and acoustics work each require the relevant add-on module at extra cost.
COMSOL Multiphysics: What does maintenance cost?
Perpetual licences include 12 months of updates and support, then renew at 20% of the then-current price per year.
COMSOL Multiphysics: Which licence type should a team buy?
Floating Network if more than a couple of people use it, since it shares concurrency and includes cluster and cloud computing at no extra charge.
COMSOL Multiphysics: Is pricing published?
No. COMSOL publishes licence types but no prices; every purchase goes through a quote.
Related pages
More on COMSOL Multiphysics
Other head to heads
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs OnShape
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Siemens NX
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs ANSYS Fluent
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Creo
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Inventor
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs nTop
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Houdini
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs CoreTechnologie
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Bambu Studio
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Nomad Sculpt
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Enscape
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Zoo
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Twinmotion
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Shapr3D
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs ZBrush
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs V-Ray
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs KeyShot
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs FreeCAD
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Arnold
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Redshift
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Octane Render
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs PrusaSlicer
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Ultimaker Cura
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Lumion
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs MicroSurvey CAD
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs RealityScan
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Corona Renderer
- Modo vs OnShape
- Modo vs Siemens NX
- Modo vs ANSYS Fluent
- Modo vs Creo
- Modo vs Inventor
- Modo vs nTop
- Modo vs Houdini
- Modo vs CoreTechnologie
- Modo vs Bambu Studio
- Modo vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Modo vs Nomad Sculpt
- Modo vs Enscape
- Modo vs Zoo
- Modo vs Twinmotion
- Modo vs Shapr3D
- Modo vs ZBrush
- Modo vs V-Ray
- Modo vs KeyShot
- Modo vs FreeCAD
- Modo vs Arnold
- Modo vs Redshift
- Modo vs Octane Render
- Modo vs PrusaSlicer
- Modo vs Ultimaker Cura
- Modo vs Lumion
- Modo vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Modo vs RealityScan
- Modo vs Corona Renderer

