APIs · head to head
Column vs Convoy

Column
APIs
A nationally chartered US bank that ships its own API, with no middleware in between
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convoy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Column column publishes no pricing whatsoever, so there is no way to model cost before a sales process, and terms are negotiated per programme which favours larger, more sophisticated buyers.; Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- They diverge on capability: Column covers National bank charter, Convoy covers Inbound and outbound.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Column and Convoy actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Column
- National bank charter
- Direct Federal Reserve access
- Ledger and accounts
- International wires
- Real-time payments
- Lending
- Cheque handling
- Correspondent banking
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Column
- A fintech that has been burned by a middleware provider failing and wants its deposits held by the same entity that provides the APInot Convoy
- A payments company needing direct Fedwire and Swift access rather than routing through a correspondent it cannot seenot Convoy
- A lender that wants origination, funding and deposit accounts from one chartered institution instead of three counterpartiesnot Convoy
- A payroll or treasury platform where same-day settlement certainty matters more than fast onboardingnot Convoy
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Column
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Column
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Column
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Column
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Column
- Column publishes no pricing whatsoever, so there is no way to model cost before a sales process, and terms are negotiated per programme which favours larger, more sophisticated buyers.
- Onboarding is bank diligence rather than vendor sign-up, and programmes routinely spend several months on compliance review, flow of funds documentation and volume forecasting before the first live transaction.
- Column selects its customers and declines many, so the charter advantage is only available to programmes it considers acceptable risk, which excludes most early-stage teams.
- It is United States only, so any programme with international account or local payment needs must add a second banking relationship and reconcile across both.
- Being the bank means Column also carries the bank's regulatory constraints, so product changes that affect risk, such as new customer segments or higher-risk flows, need approval rather than a configuration change.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Pricing, plan by plan
Column
On request- Column Bank Platform$undefined/year
- Deposit accounts and ledger
- ACH, wire, RTP and cheque rails
- International wires over Swift
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Which should you pick?
Choose Column if
- You need national bank charter.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want direct federal reserve access.
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Questions people ask
- Is Column or Convoy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Column starts at On request and Convoy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Column or Convoy?
- Convoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Column and Free for Convoy.
- Does Column or Convoy run on more platforms?
- Column runs on Web, API. Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Yes. Convoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Column starts at On request.
- What is Column best used for?
- Column is most often used for a fintech that has been burned by a middleware provider failing and wants its deposits held by the same entity that provides the api, a payments company needing direct fedwire and swift access rather than routing through a correspondent it cannot see, a lender that wants origination, funding and deposit accounts from one chartered institution instead of three counterparties, a payroll or treasury platform where same-day settlement certainty matters more than fast onboarding. Of those, a fintech that has been burned by a middleware provider failing and wants its deposits held by the same entity that provides the api and a payments company needing direct fedwire and swift access rather than routing through a correspondent it cannot see are not what Convoy is typically brought in for.
- What can Column do that Convoy cannot?
- Column covers National bank charter, Direct Federal Reserve access, Ledger and accounts, International wires. Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Column: Is Column actually a bank?
Yes. It is a nationally chartered, FDIC-insured bank, which is why there is no sponsor bank behind it.
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Column: How is that different from Synctera or Unit?
Those are technology providers that connect you to a separate sponsor bank. With Column the API provider and the depository institution are the same company.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Column: What does Column cost?
Nothing is published. Pricing is negotiated per programme.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Column: How long does onboarding take?
Expect months. This is bank-grade diligence on your compliance programme, not a vendor sign-up.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Column vs Synctera
- Column vs Unit
- Column vs Formance
- Column vs Increase
- Column vs Sila
- Column vs Treasury Prime
- Column vs Vodeno
- Column vs Astra
- Column vs Fintech Farm
- Column vs Highnote
- Column vs Griffin
- Column vs Lithic
- Column vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Column vs Thredd
- Column vs Thunder Client
- Column vs Toqio
- Column vs Tyk
- Column vs Volt
- Column vs Kong
- Column vs Svix
- Column vs Janus Gateway
- Column vs Appwrite
- Column vs Gravitee
- Column vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Column vs AWS API Gateway
- Column vs Hasura
- Column vs PocketBase
- Column vs Sensedia
- Column vs Swagger
- Column vs TIBCO Mashery
- Column vs Zeplo
- Column vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Synctera
- Convoy vs Unit
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs Increase
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Treasury Prime
- Convoy vs Vodeno
- Convoy vs Astra
- Convoy vs Fintech Farm
- Convoy vs Highnote
- Convoy vs Griffin
- Convoy vs Lithic
- Convoy vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Convoy vs Thredd
- Convoy vs Thunder Client
- Convoy vs Toqio
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Volt
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
