Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Teradata

Cody
Developer Tools
AI coding assistant powered by code search
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Teradata
Databases
Long-established enterprise MPP data warehouse, rebranded in 2026 as the Autonomous Knowledge Platform, sold for cloud, on-premises and hybrid.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Cody is free; Teradata prices on request.
- Where Cody falls short: sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Teradata actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web).
Not yet recorded: founded for Teradata.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Teradata does not also cover.
Only in Teradata
- Massively parallel architecture
- Workload management
- Mature cost-based optimiser
- Cloud, on-premises and hybrid
- Bulk load utilities
- BTEQ scripting
- In-database analytics
- Enterprise Vector Store
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Teradata
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Teradata
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Teradata
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Teradata
Teradata
- A large existing Teradata estate where the practical question is which workloads to migrate first rather than whether to adoptnot Cody
- High-concurrency mixed workloads where hundreds of analysts and scheduled jobs contend and predictable prioritisation matters more than peak single-query speednot Cody
- Regulated reporting where the same query must produce the same answer for years and the audit trail of the existing implementation has valuenot Cody
- Hybrid deployments where regulatory or data-residency rules keep a portion of the warehouse on-premises while the rest moves to cloudnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Teradata
- Licensing is negotiated rather than published, so there is no way to compare total cost against a consumption-priced warehouse without entering a sales cycle, and the comparison is only ever as good as the workload profile you gave them
- The SQL dialect and the loading utilities are Teradata-specific, so every stored procedure, macro and BTEQ script written against the platform is migration debt that grows with each release you ship
- Primary index choice determines data distribution, and a poorly chosen index concentrates rows on a few processing units, which surfaces as one slow query rather than an error and needs a specialist to diagnose
- The skills market is contracting, so DBA and workload-management expertise is expensive to hire, hard to replace when someone retires, and increasingly hard to buy from consultancies whose own bench has moved to cloud warehouses
- The 2026 renaming of Vantage, VantageCloud, ClearScape and QueryGrid split documentation, runbooks and vendor material across two naming systems, so searching for an error or a configuration now returns results for a product that is described under a different name
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Teradata
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Teradata review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Teradata if
- You need massively parallel architecture.
- You also want workload management.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Teradata better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Teradata at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Teradata?
- Cody has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cody and On request for Teradata.
- Does Cody or Teradata run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Yes. Cody has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Teradata starts at On request.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Teradata is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Teradata cannot?
- Teradata covers Massively parallel architecture, Workload management, Mature cost-based optimiser, Cloud, on-premises and hybrid.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceTeradata: Is Teradata only on-premises?
No. It is sold for cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment, and the cloud offering is now branded Teradata Cloud. A large part of the installed base is still on-premises or hybrid.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceTeradata: How does it compare to Snowflake or BigQuery?
On raw elasticity and cost transparency the cloud warehouses win. On mixed-workload concurrency management against a large existing query estate Teradata is still hard to replace, which is why migrations off it take years rather than quarters.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceTeradata: Why do organisations stay on it?
Because the cost of leaving is the estate, not the data. Thousands of procedures, scripts and extracts written in a proprietary dialect have to be rewritten and revalidated, and in regulated reporting that revalidation is the expensive part.
Teradata: What changed in the 2026 rebrand?
Vantage became the Autonomous Knowledge Platform, VantageCloud became Teradata Cloud, ClearScape Analytics became AI Studio and QueryGrid became Fabric. The underlying products are continuous with what came before.
Teradata: Can it handle AI and vector workloads?
It has added an Enterprise Vector Store and in-database analytics branded AI Studio. Whether that is preferable to moving the data into a purpose-built vector store depends on how much of your data already lives in the warehouse.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs CodeSandbox
- Cody vs GitLab
- Cody vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cody vs Eclipse
- Cody vs Garden
- Cody vs HCP Terraform
- Cody vs Helm
- Cody vs Jenkins
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cody vs Solace PubSub+
- Cody vs Apache Solr
- Cody vs Immuta
- Cody vs Turso
- Cody vs BigQuery
- Cody vs Apache Hadoop
- Cody vs LanceDB
- Cody vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Cody vs Oracle Database
- Cody vs Trino
- Cody vs Amazon Redshift
- Cody vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Cody vs DataGrip
- Cody vs Estuary
- Cody vs Apache Pinot
- Cody vs Apache Pulsar
- Cody vs Cassandra
- Cody vs CouchDB
- Teradata vs Sourcegraph
- Teradata vs Sweep
- Teradata vs Deep Code
- Teradata vs GitHub Copilot
- Teradata vs Bazel
- Teradata vs Fig
- Teradata vs GoLand
- Teradata vs Warp
- Teradata vs CodeSandbox
- Teradata vs GitLab
- Teradata vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Teradata vs Eclipse
- Teradata vs Garden
- Teradata vs HCP Terraform
- Teradata vs Helm
- Teradata vs Jenkins
- Teradata vs PhpStorm
- Teradata vs GitLab CI/CD
- Teradata vs Solace PubSub+
- Teradata vs Apache Solr
- Teradata vs Immuta
- Teradata vs Turso
- Teradata vs BigQuery
- Teradata vs Apache Hadoop
- Teradata vs LanceDB
- Teradata vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Teradata vs Oracle Database
- Teradata vs Trino
- Teradata vs Amazon Redshift
- Teradata vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Teradata vs DataGrip
- Teradata vs Estuary
- Teradata vs Apache Pinot
- Teradata vs Apache Pulsar
- Teradata vs Cassandra
- Teradata vs CouchDB
