Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Cisco Duo

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cisco Duo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Cisco Duo free tier limited to 10 users maximum
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Cisco Duo actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Cisco Duo
Nothing recorded that Baffle does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Cisco Duo
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Cisco Duo
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Cisco Duo
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
- Eliminating phishing with passwordless authnot Baffle
- Implementing zero trust with device trustnot Baffle
- Protecting sessions from hijacking and theftnot Baffle
- Managing compliance for regulated industriesnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Cisco Duo
- Free tier limited to 10 users maximum
- Licenses must be purchased in 10-user increments (under 100 users) or 25-user increments (100+ users)
- Pricing is per-user per-month with minimum purchase increments
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Cisco Duo
Free- FreeFree
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- Seamless integrations
- Authenticator app
- Essentials$3/month
- All Free features
- Duo Directory
- Phishing-resistant MFA
- Advantage$6/month
- All Essentials features
- Identity intelligence
- Cisco Identity Intelligence (ISPM, ITDR)
- Premier$9/month
- All Advantage features
- Complete device trust
- VPN-less remote access
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Cisco Duo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Cisco Duo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Cisco Duo?
- Cisco Duo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Cisco Duo.
- Does Baffle or Cisco Duo run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Cisco Duo runs on Web.
- Can I use Cisco Duo for free?
- Yes. Cisco Duo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Cisco Duo is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Cisco Duo cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Cisco Duo: How much does Cisco Duo cost?
Cisco Duo Free is $0/user/month (up to 10 users). Paid plans start at $3/user/month (Essentials), $6/user/month (Advantage), and $9/user/month (Premier). Billing is per-user per-month.
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Cisco Duo: Is Cisco Duo free to try?
Yes, Duo Free offers multi-factor authentication and seamless integrations at $0/user/month for up to 10 users.
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Cisco Duo: What is the minimum purchase for Cisco Duo?
Organizations must buy licenses in 10-user increments for under 100 users, or 25-user increments for 100 or more users. Plans are modifiable at any time.
SourceBaffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Cisco Duo: What does the Advantage plan add over Essentials?
Advantage ($6/user/month) adds identity intelligence, Cisco Identity Intelligence (ISPM, ITDR), Duo Passport, session theft protection, Active Directory Defense, and risk-based authentication.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Baffle vs Beyond Identity
- Baffle vs HID Global
- Baffle vs Norton 360
- Baffle vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Baffle vs Authy
- Baffle vs Stytch
- Baffle vs Descope
- Baffle vs Google Authenticator
- Baffle vs Sardine
- Baffle vs SentinelOne
- Baffle vs Shufti Pro
- Baffle vs Signicat
- Baffle vs Silent Eight
- Baffle vs Socket
- Baffle vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Cisco Duo vs Very Good Security
- Cisco Duo vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cisco Duo vs 1Password
- Cisco Duo vs LastPass
- Cisco Duo vs Mullvad VPN
- Cisco Duo vs Private Internet Access
- Cisco Duo vs IVPN
- Cisco Duo vs TunnelBear
- Cisco Duo vs Enpass
- Cisco Duo vs Passbolt
- Cisco Duo vs Feedzai
- Cisco Duo vs Genetec Security Center
- Cisco Duo vs Tenable Nessus
- Cisco Duo vs Transmit Security
- Cisco Duo vs TrustArc
- Cisco Duo vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Cisco Duo vs VMware Carbon Black
- Cisco Duo vs Wireshark
- Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Cisco Duo vs Beyond Identity
- Cisco Duo vs HID Global
- Cisco Duo vs Norton 360
- Cisco Duo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cisco Duo vs Authy
- Cisco Duo vs Stytch
- Cisco Duo vs Descope
- Cisco Duo vs Google Authenticator
- Cisco Duo vs Sardine
- Cisco Duo vs SentinelOne
- Cisco Duo vs Shufti Pro
- Cisco Duo vs Signicat
- Cisco Duo vs Silent Eight
- Cisco Duo vs Socket
- Cisco Duo vs SentinelOne Singularity

