Softwr

ERP · head to head

Cin7 Core vs Jaggaer

Cin7 Core logo

Cin7 Core

ERP

Inventory management for growing businesses

From
$349/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
J

Jaggaer

ERP

Source to pay procurement suite that sits on top of an existing ERP

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Cin7 Core transaction limits vary by tier; exceeding included sale orders or integrations requires additional cost; Jaggaer this is a spend layer and not an ERP, so it must integrate with the finance system for vendor master, cost centres, budgets and invoice posting, and that integration is a build with ongoing maintenance rather than a configuration setting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Cin7 Core and Jaggaer actually diverge.

Attributes where Cin7 Core and Jaggaer differ
AttributeCin7 CoreJaggaer
Starting price$349/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Cin7 Core

Nothing recorded that Jaggaer does not also cover.

Only in Jaggaer

  • Supplier management
  • Sourcing
  • Contract lifecycle
  • Guided buying and catalogues
  • Requisition and purchase order processing
  • Invoicing and matching
  • Spend analytics
  • Supplier network

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Cin7 Core

  • Syncing inventory across e-commerce, POS, and wholesale channelsnot Jaggaer
  • Preventing stockouts in multi-warehouse distribution networksnot Jaggaer
  • Automating bill-of-materials for assembly-based manufacturingnot Jaggaer
  • Forecasting demand to optimize production schedulesnot Jaggaer

Jaggaer

  • A university or research institution that must enforce restricted fund and grant rules at the point of requisition rather than at auditnot Cin7 Core
  • A multi site organisation trying to consolidate fragmented purchasing onto negotiated contracts it already has but does not usenot Cin7 Core
  • A regulated manufacturer that must document supplier qualification and keep an auditable record of the sourcing decisionnot Cin7 Core
  • A finance team that can report what was spent but cannot say what it was spent on or with whom by categorynot Cin7 Core

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Cin7 Core

  • Transaction limits vary by tier; exceeding included sale orders or integrations requires additional cost
  • Cin7 Omni requires custom pricing via sales contact

Jaggaer

  • This is a spend layer and not an ERP, so it must integrate with the finance system for vendor master, cost centres, budgets and invoice posting, and that integration is a build with ongoing maintenance rather than a configuration setting.
  • The suite is licensed by module, so a demonstration that shows sourcing, contracts, analytics and invoicing working together may represent four separate purchases and a quote for one module tells you little about the cost of the working system.
  • Savings depend on buyer compliance rather than on software, so an organisation without the authority to stop off system purchasing ends up paying a subscription for a reporting tool that describes the leakage it was bought to prevent.
  • Supplier enablement is slow and unglamorous work, because every supplier you want transacting electronically has to be contacted, configured and tested, and low enablement rates leave you running two processes at once.
  • Spend analytics is only as good as the classification behind it, so historic data with inconsistent supplier names and missing category codes needs a cleansing exercise before any report from it can be shown to a board.

Pricing, plan by plan

Cin7 Core

$349/month
  • Standard$349/month
    • 5 users
    • 2 e-commerce/app integrations
    • 6,000 sale orders/year
  • Pro$599/month
    • 10 users
    • 4 e-commerce/app integrations
    • 24,000 sale orders/year
  • Advanced$1199/month
    • 15 users
    • 6 e-commerce/app integrations
    • 120,000 sale orders/year

Jaggaer

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Jaggaer review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Cin7 Core if

Nothing in the data separates Cin7 Core from Jaggaer on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Cin7 Core review

Choose Jaggaer if

  • You need supplier management.
  • You also want sourcing.
Jaggaer review

Questions people ask

Is Cin7 Core or Jaggaer better?
Neither clearly leads. Cin7 Core starts at $349/month and Jaggaer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Cin7 Core or Jaggaer?
Cin7 Core starts at $349/month and Jaggaer at On request.
Does Cin7 Core or Jaggaer run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Cin7 Core best used for?
Cin7 Core is most often used for syncing inventory across e-commerce, pos, and wholesale channels, preventing stockouts in multi-warehouse distribution networks, automating bill-of-materials for assembly-based manufacturing, forecasting demand to optimize production schedules. Of those, syncing inventory across e-commerce, pos, and wholesale channels and preventing stockouts in multi-warehouse distribution networks are not what Jaggaer is typically brought in for.
What can Cin7 Core do that Jaggaer cannot?
Jaggaer covers Supplier management, Sourcing, Contract lifecycle, Guided buying and catalogues.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cin7 Core: What is the base price for Cin7 Core?

Cin7 Core pricing starts at $349 per month for the Standard plan, which includes 5 users, 2 e-commerce integrations, and up to 6,000 sale orders per year.

Source
Jaggaer: Do I need this if my ERP already has a purchasing module?

ERP purchasing records transactions well and influences them poorly. If your problem is that buyers ignore negotiated contracts, or that you cannot analyse spend by category, a dedicated suite adds something. If your problem is purchase order processing, your ERP module is cheaper and already integrated.

Cin7 Core: How many users and integrations are included in each plan?

Standard includes 5 users and 2 integrations; Pro includes 10 users and 4 integrations; Advanced includes 15 users and 6 integrations. Additional users and integrations are available for extra cost.

Source
Jaggaer: How does it compare with SAP Ariba or Coupa?

All three cover the same ground. The differences that matter in practice are which one your ERP integrates with most cheaply, which has real depth in your sector, and which suppliers are already transacting on the network. JAGGAER has an unusually deep footprint in higher education and research purchasing.

Cin7 Core: What happens if I exceed my included number of sale orders?

Standard plan allows 6,000 sale orders per year, Pro allows 24,000, and Advanced allows 120,000. Exceeding these limits incurs additional charges; exact fees for overages are not specified on the pricing page.

Source
Jaggaer: What does implementation actually involve?

Supplier data cleansing, category taxonomy design, approval workflow design, ERP integration and supplier enablement. The software configuration is the smallest of those. Expect the services engagement to be comparable to the first year of subscription.

Cin7 Core: Is there a free trial available?

Yes, Cin7 offers a free trial option, though the specific trial duration is not detailed on the pricing page.

Source
Jaggaer: Is it sold direct or through partners?

JAGGAER sells direct and also works with implementation partners on larger programmes. Whichever route you take, ask specifically who will hold the integration work and whether that team has connected to your ERP version before.

Share

Related pages

More on Cin7 Core

More on Jaggaer

Keep looking

Other head to heads