Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Helicone

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Helicone
AI
Open-source LLM observability and gateway platform for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Helicone the free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Helicone actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Helicone
- Request dashboard and tracking
- Sessions and segments
- Helicone Query Language (HQL)
- Prompt datasets and improvement
- Playground
- Rate limits and alerts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Helicone
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Helicone
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Helicone
Helicone
- Monitoring cost and latency of production LLM applicationsnot Cilium
- Debugging multi-step agent sessionsnot Cilium
- Managing and iterating on prompts across a teamnot Cilium
- Routing requests across multiple LLM providersnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Helicone
- The free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.
- Advanced compliance features like SOC 2 and HIPAA are only available starting at the $799/month Team plan.
- Usage beyond the free tier is billed on top of the base subscription, adding cost unpredictability at scale.
- On-premises deployment is restricted to the custom Enterprise tier.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Helicone
Free- HobbyFree
- 10,000 free requests
- 1 GB storage
- 1 seat
- Pro$79/month
- 10K free requests included, usage-based beyond
- 7-day free trial
- Unlimited playgrounds and workspaces
- Team$799/month
- 5 organizations
- SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance
- Dedicated Slack channel access
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom MSAs and SAML SSO
- On-premises deployment
- Bulk cloud discounts
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose Helicone if
- You need request dashboard and tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want sessions and segments.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Helicone better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Helicone at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Helicone?
- Cilium starts at Free and Helicone at Free.
- Does Cilium or Helicone run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Helicone runs on web, api.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Helicone is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Helicone cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking, Sessions and segments, Helicone Query Language (HQL), Prompt datasets and improvement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Helicone: What does Helicone cost?
Helicone offers a free Hobby plan, a Pro plan at $79/month, a Team plan at $799/month, and custom Enterprise pricing, with usage-based charges applying beyond included request limits.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Helicone: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan includes 10,000 requests per month, 1 GB of storage, 1 seat, and 1 organization, aimed at kickstarting AI projects.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Helicone: Are there discounts available?
Helicone offers 50% off the first year for qualifying startups, discounts for non-profits, a $100 annual credit for open-source projects, and free access for students.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs PromptLayer
- Cilium vs Arize AI
- Cilium vs Galileo
- Cilium vs Together AI
- Cilium vs Stable Diffusion
- Cilium vs AutoGen
- Cilium vs LangGraph
- Cilium vs Aider
- Cilium vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Cilium vs Tabnine
- Cilium vs Amazon Q Developer
- Cilium vs Replicate
- Cilium vs Gumloop
- Cilium vs Inflection AI
- Cilium vs LatchBio
- Cilium vs LOVO
- Cilium vs Manus
- Cilium vs Modal
- Helicone vs Podman
- Helicone vs K3s
- Helicone vs Akamai
- Helicone vs Crossplane
- Helicone vs OpenEBS
- Helicone vs DigitalOcean
- Helicone vs Portworx
- Helicone vs Vault
- Helicone vs Fastly
- Helicone vs HAProxy
- Helicone vs Hetzner Cloud
- Helicone vs Infracost
- Helicone vs Lambda
- Helicone vs Linode
- Helicone vs Northflank
- Helicone vs Oracle Cloud
- Helicone vs Buildah
- Helicone vs Rancher
- Helicone vs PromptLayer
- Helicone vs Arize AI
- Helicone vs Galileo
- Helicone vs Together AI
- Helicone vs Stable Diffusion
- Helicone vs AutoGen
- Helicone vs LangGraph
- Helicone vs Aider
- Helicone vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Helicone vs Tabnine
- Helicone vs Amazon Q Developer
- Helicone vs Replicate
- Helicone vs Gumloop
- Helicone vs Inflection AI
- Helicone vs LatchBio
- Helicone vs LOVO
- Helicone vs Manus
- Helicone vs Modal
