Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs GraphQL Apollo

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cilium | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, Linux | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot GraphQL Apollo
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot GraphQL Apollo
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Cilium
- Schema federationnot Cilium
- API analytics and monitoringnot Cilium
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or GraphQL Apollo?
- Cilium starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free.
- Does Cilium or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs Hasura
- Cilium vs Appwrite
- Cilium vs PocketBase
- Cilium vs Sanity
- Cilium vs Strapi
- Cilium vs GraphQL Playground
- Cilium vs Kong Gateway
- Cilium vs Parse Server
- Cilium vs WSO2 API Manager
- Cilium vs Janus Gateway
- Cilium vs Directus
- Cilium vs KeystoneJS
- Cilium vs Solaris
- Cilium vs Stainless
- Cilium vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Cilium vs Thredd
- Cilium vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Podman
- GraphQL Apollo vs K3s
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akamai
- GraphQL Apollo vs Crossplane
- GraphQL Apollo vs OpenEBS
- GraphQL Apollo vs DigitalOcean
- GraphQL Apollo vs Portworx
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vault
- GraphQL Apollo vs Fastly
- GraphQL Apollo vs HAProxy
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hetzner Cloud
- GraphQL Apollo vs Infracost
- GraphQL Apollo vs Lambda
- GraphQL Apollo vs Linode
- GraphQL Apollo vs Northflank
- GraphQL Apollo vs Oracle Cloud
- GraphQL Apollo vs Buildah
- GraphQL Apollo vs Rancher
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

