Healthcare · head to head
ChiroTouch vs OpenMRS

ChiroTouch
Healthcare
Practice management software for chiropractic practices
- From
- $75/month
- Rated
- -

OpenMRS
Healthcare
Open source electronic medical record platform for low-resource settings, with no vendor and paid implementers instead
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenMRS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ChiroTouch chiroTouch does not publish specific pricing amounts on their website; OpenMRS there is no vendor and no support contract from OpenMRS itself, so a procurement that requires a named supplier with a service level must instead contract an implementer, and the quality of that implementer determines the outcome more than the software does
- They diverge on capability: ChiroTouch covers Practice Management, OpenMRS covers Concept dictionary.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ChiroTouch and OpenMRS actually diverge.
| Attribute | ChiroTouch | OpenMRS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $75/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Linux, Web, Windows |
| Founded | 2001 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ChiroTouch
- Practice Management
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Billing
- Patient Portal
- Reports
- Insurance
- Clearinghouses
Only in OpenMRS
- Concept dictionary
- Modular architecture
- Modern front end
- FHIR support
- Offline tolerance
- Patient matching and registration
- Distributions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ChiroTouch
- Practice management and EHR for chiropractic clinicsnot OpenMRS
- Charting visits, scheduling patients and running front desk workflowsnot OpenMRS
- Insurance billing, claims submission and patient payment collectionnot OpenMRS
OpenMRS
- A ministry of health standardising HIV treatment records across hundreds of facilities where per-patient licensing would be unaffordablenot ChiroTouch
- A hospital network in a country where no commercial vendor supports the local language, clinical forms or reporting requirementsnot ChiroTouch
- An NGO running a tuberculosis programme that must report into DHIS2 and needs the clinical record beneath it to be modifiablenot ChiroTouch
- A health system that wants to own its clinical data model outright rather than depend on a vendor to extend itnot ChiroTouch
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ChiroTouch
- ChiroTouch does not publish specific pricing amounts on their website
- Three tiers exist (Start, Grow, Scale) but prices are not displayed
- Company directs customers to book a demo or call 800.852.1771 for pricing details
- Optional add-ons (CT Pay, CT Billing Suite, CT SmartFit) have unknown pricing
- All ChiroTouch plans include AI features and unlimited support but cost comparison requires direct contact
OpenMRS
- There is no vendor and no support contract from OpenMRS itself, so a procurement that requires a named supplier with a service level must instead contract an implementer, and the quality of that implementer determines the outcome more than the software does
- It is a framework rather than a ready product, so a deployment requires clinical content, form design, concept dictionary work and integration before a single patient is registered, and that work is months of skilled effort
- Funding comes largely from donor programmes, which makes the pace of core development dependent on grant cycles rather than on a commercial roadmap, and priorities can shift when a funder does
- Distribution choice, core OpenMRS against Bahmni against Ozone, locks in a different set of components and a different implementer pool, and migrating between distributions later is close to a fresh implementation
- The people cost never goes away: a national deployment needs permanent internal informatics capacity or a permanent support contract, and organisations that budget only the zero licence fee run out of money at the point the system becomes clinically critical
Pricing, plan by plan
ChiroTouch
$75/month- Essentials$75/month
- Scheduling
- Charting
- Billing
OpenMRS
Free- OpenMRSFree
- Openly licensed, no licence fee and no seat limits
- Community support through forums and the OpenMRS Talk platform
- No support contract available from OpenMRS itself
Which should you pick?
Choose ChiroTouch if
- You need practice management.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want ehr.
Choose OpenMRS if
- You need concept dictionary.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web, Windows.
- You also want modular architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is ChiroTouch or OpenMRS better?
- Neither clearly leads. ChiroTouch starts at $75/month and OpenMRS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ChiroTouch or OpenMRS?
- OpenMRS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $75/month for ChiroTouch and Free for OpenMRS.
- Does ChiroTouch or OpenMRS run on more platforms?
- ChiroTouch runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. OpenMRS runs on Linux, Web, Windows.
- Can I use OpenMRS for free?
- Yes. OpenMRS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ChiroTouch starts at $75/month.
- What is ChiroTouch best used for?
- ChiroTouch is most often used for practice management and ehr for chiropractic clinics, charting visits, scheduling patients and running front desk workflows, insurance billing, claims submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management and ehr for chiropractic clinics and charting visits, scheduling patients and running front desk workflows are not what OpenMRS is typically brought in for.
- What can ChiroTouch do that OpenMRS cannot?
- ChiroTouch covers Practice Management, EHR, Scheduling, Billing. OpenMRS covers Concept dictionary, Modular architecture, Modern front end, FHIR support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ChiroTouch: How much does ChiroTouch cost?
ChiroTouch does not publish pricing on their website. The company offers three tiers (Start, Grow, Scale), each with progressively more AI features, but pricing requires booking a demo or calling 800.852.1771 to speak with sales.
SourceOpenMRS: Who supports OpenMRS if it breaks?
Not OpenMRS itself. Support is bought from implementers such as Mekom Solutions, which offers long-term production service level agreements for OpenMRS, Bahmni and Ozone deployments, or from regional partners.
ChiroTouch: What are the differences between ChiroTouch plans?
ChiroTouch Start is for efficient daily operations; ChiroTouch Grow (most popular) adds AI Scribe and multi-location support; ChiroTouch Scale adds AI Review Responder, AI Translator, and lead management. All plans include AI core features, guided onboarding, and unlimited support, but pricing requires direct contact.
SourceOpenMRS: Is it really free?
The software has no licence fee. Hosting, configuration, clinical content, integration and support are the real cost, and they are ongoing.
ChiroTouch: Are there add-ons available for ChiroTouch?
Yes, ChiroTouch offers optional add-ons including CT Pay (payment processing), CT Billing Suite (insurance billing), and CT SmartFit (exercise programs). Pricing for these add-ons is not disclosed and requires contacting ChiroTouch directly.
SourceOpenMRS: What is the difference between OpenMRS, Bahmni and Ozone?
OpenMRS is the core platform. Bahmni and Ozone are distributions that package it with billing, laboratory and inventory components. Choosing a distribution constrains your implementer options.
OpenMRS: Does it support FHIR?
Yes. FHIR support is the standard route for integrating laboratory, pharmacy and national reporting systems.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ChiroTouch vs Athenahealth
- ChiroTouch vs Epic Systems
- ChiroTouch vs Cerner
- ChiroTouch vs Amwell
- ChiroTouch vs Practice Fusion
- ChiroTouch vs DrChrono
- ChiroTouch vs Kareo Clinical
- ChiroTouch vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- ChiroTouch vs eClinicalWorks
- ChiroTouch vs Healthie
- ChiroTouch vs NextGen Healthcare
- ChiroTouch vs WebPT
- ChiroTouch vs TherapyNotes
- ChiroTouch vs Zocdoc
- ChiroTouch vs Bahmni
- ChiroTouch vs athenaOne
- ChiroTouch vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- ChiroTouch vs GNU Health
- ChiroTouch vs DHIS2
- ChiroTouch vs OpenClinica
- ChiroTouch vs Open Dental
- ChiroTouch vs Ambra Health
- ChiroTouch vs Visage Imaging
- ChiroTouch vs Included Health
- ChiroTouch vs Halaxy
- ChiroTouch vs Meru Health
- ChiroTouch vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- ChiroTouch vs PioneerRx
- ChiroTouch vs Rad AI
- ChiroTouch vs Aidoc
- ChiroTouch vs Annalise.ai
- ChiroTouch vs Rx30
- OpenMRS vs Athenahealth
- OpenMRS vs Epic Systems
- OpenMRS vs Cerner
- OpenMRS vs Amwell
- OpenMRS vs Practice Fusion
- OpenMRS vs DrChrono
- OpenMRS vs Kareo Clinical
- OpenMRS vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- OpenMRS vs eClinicalWorks
- OpenMRS vs Healthie
- OpenMRS vs NextGen Healthcare
- OpenMRS vs WebPT
- OpenMRS vs TherapyNotes
- OpenMRS vs Zocdoc
- OpenMRS vs Bahmni
- OpenMRS vs athenaOne
- OpenMRS vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- OpenMRS vs GNU Health
- OpenMRS vs DHIS2
- OpenMRS vs OpenClinica
- OpenMRS vs Open Dental
- OpenMRS vs Ambra Health
- OpenMRS vs Visage Imaging
- OpenMRS vs Included Health
- OpenMRS vs Halaxy
- OpenMRS vs Meru Health
- OpenMRS vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- OpenMRS vs PioneerRx
- OpenMRS vs Rad AI
- OpenMRS vs Aidoc
- OpenMRS vs Annalise.ai
- OpenMRS vs Rx30
