Logging · head to head
Checkmk vs Openstatus

Checkmk
Logging
Comprehensive IT monitoring, open and flexible
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Openstatus
Logging
Status pages with uptime monitoring and compliance-ready incident tracking
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Free plans on both; paid from €190/mo and $30/mo.
- Where Checkmk falls short: pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average).
- Where Openstatus falls short: free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Checkmk and Openstatus actually diverge.
| Attribute | Checkmk | Openstatus |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, API |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), category (Logging).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Openstatus, founded for Checkmk.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Checkmk
Nothing recorded that Openstatus does not also cover.
Only in Openstatus
- Branded status pages
- Global monitoring
- Incident notifications
- Audit-ready trails
- API and CLI access
- Terraform provider
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Checkmk
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Openstatus
- System observabilitynot Openstatus
- Enterprise compliance monitoringnot Openstatus
Openstatus
- Publishing incident status pages to customersnot Checkmk
- Demonstrating compliance readiness to auditorsnot Checkmk
- Alerting internal teams when services are downnot Checkmk
- Tracking uptime metrics across global regionsnot Checkmk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Checkmk
- Pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average)
- Professional support limited to 8-10 hours per week on base plans
- Synthetic monitoring is separate add-on with per-test pricing
Openstatus
- Free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page
- Per-status-page pricing adds cost for multi-product organizations
- No built-in workflow orchestration or incident response automation
- Limited historical analytics beyond incident documentation
- No AI-powered incident diagnosis or root cause analysis
Pricing, plan by plan
Checkmk
Free- Community (Self-Hosted)Free
- No cost, forever
- Up to ~100 hosts
- Basic infrastructure monitoring
- Pro (Self-Hosted)€190/mo
- Advanced analytics
- Reporting
- Distributed monitoring
- Ultimate (Self-Hosted)€275/mo
- Full-stack observability
- Advanced security compliance
- 10 hours x 5 days professional support (upgradable to 24/7)
- CloudAI (SaaS)€240/mo
- Fully managed cloud hosting
- 99.5% uptime SLA
- Supports up to 50000 services
Openstatus
Free- FreeFree
- 1 monitor with 10-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 3 components
- No credit card required
- Starter$30/mo
- 20 monitors with 1-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 20 components
- 3-month data retention
- Pro$100/mo
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 5 status pages with 50 components each
- 12-month data retention
- Scale$500/mo
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 10 status pages with 500 components each
- 24-month data retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Openstatus if
- You need branded status pages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want global monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Checkmk or Openstatus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Checkmk starts at Free and Openstatus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Checkmk or Openstatus?
- Checkmk starts at Free and Openstatus at Free.
- Does Checkmk or Openstatus run on more platforms?
- Checkmk runs on Web. Openstatus runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Checkmk for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Checkmk best used for?
- Checkmk is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, system observability, enterprise compliance monitoring. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and system observability are not what Openstatus is typically brought in for.
- What can Checkmk do that Openstatus cannot?
- Openstatus covers Branded status pages, Global monitoring, Incident notifications, Audit-ready trails.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Checkmk: Is there a free version of Checkmk?
Yes, Checkmk Community edition is free forever and supports up to approximately 100 hosts for basic infrastructure monitoring with no cost.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I use OpenStatus for free?
Yes, the free tier includes 1 monitor with 10-minute check intervals and 1 status page with 3 components, no credit card required.
SourceCheckmk: How does Checkmk calculate pricing by host count?
Checkmk uses service-based pricing where each monitored aspect (file system, hardware sensor, switch port, metric) counts as one service. On average, there are approximately 30 services per host.
SourceOpenstatus: What is included in annual billing for Starter plan?
Annual billing costs $300/year (vs $360/month), saving 2 months. Includes 20 monitors, 1-minute intervals, and all alert types.
SourceCheckmk: What is the difference between Checkmk Pro and Ultimate tiers?
Pro tier at 190 EUR/month includes advanced analytics and 8x5 support, while Ultimate at 275 EUR/month adds full-stack observability, advanced compliance features, and upgradable 24/7 support.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I add extra status pages beyond my plan limit?
Yes, additional status pages cost $20/month and are billed separately on top of your plan.
SourceCheckmk: Does Checkmk offer a managed SaaS option?
Yes, Checkmk CloudAI is a fully managed SaaS tier at 240 EUR/month with 99.5% uptime SLA and support for up to 50000 services.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Checkmk vs Sentry
- Checkmk vs Nagios XI
- Checkmk vs PagerDuty
- Checkmk vs InfluxDB
- Checkmk vs Elastic
- Checkmk vs Fluentd
- Checkmk vs Graylog
- Checkmk vs Site24x7
- Checkmk vs Coralogix
- Checkmk vs Datadog
- Checkmk vs Grafana Loki
- Checkmk vs incident.io
- Checkmk vs Cronitor
- Checkmk vs FireHydrant
- Checkmk vs Telegraf
- Checkmk vs ELK Stack
- Checkmk vs Kibana
- Checkmk vs Logstash
- Checkmk vs Healthchecks
- Checkmk vs Rootly
- Checkmk vs Checkly
- Checkmk vs Uptime.com
- Checkmk vs Honeybadger
- Checkmk vs Better Stack
- Checkmk vs StatusCake
- Checkmk vs Mezmo
- Checkmk vs New Relic Logs
- Checkmk vs Papertrail
- Checkmk vs Raygun
- Checkmk vs Retrace
- Openstatus vs Sentry
- Openstatus vs Nagios XI
- Openstatus vs PagerDuty
- Openstatus vs InfluxDB
- Openstatus vs Elastic
- Openstatus vs Fluentd
- Openstatus vs Graylog
- Openstatus vs Site24x7
- Openstatus vs Coralogix
- Openstatus vs Datadog
- Openstatus vs Grafana Loki
- Openstatus vs incident.io
- Openstatus vs Cronitor
- Openstatus vs FireHydrant
- Openstatus vs Telegraf
- Openstatus vs ELK Stack
- Openstatus vs Kibana
- Openstatus vs Logstash
- Openstatus vs Healthchecks
- Openstatus vs Rootly
- Openstatus vs Checkly
- Openstatus vs Uptime.com
- Openstatus vs Honeybadger
- Openstatus vs Better Stack
- Openstatus vs StatusCake
- Openstatus vs Mezmo
- Openstatus vs New Relic Logs
- Openstatus vs Papertrail
- Openstatus vs Raygun
- Openstatus vs Retrace
